Report Writing
Overview
Report writing transforms research findings into clear, actionable documents for decision-makers. This skill covers best practices for structuring, writing, and visualizing market research outputs.
Report Types
Executive Brief (1-2 pages)
- •Key findings only
- •Single recommendation
- •For: C-suite, board
- •Time to read: 5 minutes
Research Summary (3-5 pages)
- •Main findings with evidence
- •Multiple recommendations
- •For: VPs, directors
- •Time to read: 15 minutes
Full Report (10-30 pages)
- •Comprehensive analysis
- •Detailed methodology
- •For: Analysts, implementers
- •Time to read: 30-60 minutes
Appendix/Data Pack
- •Supporting data
- •Detailed tables
- •For: Deep dives
- •Reference as needed
Document Structure
Executive Summary (Always First)
Length: 1 paragraph to 1 page Content:
- •Context (1 sentence)
- •Key findings (3-5 bullets)
- •Primary recommendation
- •Critical risk or caveat
Example:
We analyzed the AI code assistant market to evaluate entry opportunity. Key findings: (1) Market growing 45% annually to $15B by 2027; (2) Top 3 players hold 60% share with consolidation expected; (3) Enterprise segment underserved; (4) Regulatory uncertainty emerging. Recommendation: Pursue enterprise segment with compliance-focused positioning. Risk: AI regulation may increase development costs 20-40%.
Body Sections
Market Overview
- •What: Define the market
- •Why: Why this matters now
- •How big: Size and growth
Analysis Sections
- •Follow logical flow
- •Lead with insights, support with data
- •Use headers for scannability
- •Include trend indicators (INC/DEC/CONST)
Recommendations
- •Numbered, prioritized
- •Each has: What, Why, How, Risk
- •Actionable and specific
Appendix
- •Methodology notes
- •Data sources
- •Detailed tables
- •Additional analysis
Writing Principles
Clarity First
Do: Lead with the insight
Market consolidation is accelerating, with top 3 players' share growing from 45% to 60% in 18 months.
Don't: Bury the insight
According to our research, when we looked at market share data over the past 18 months, we found that the leading companies have been growing.
Pyramid Structure
- •Start with conclusion
- •Support with key points
- •Provide details as needed
Each paragraph:
- •Topic sentence (the point)
- •Supporting evidence
- •Implication/so what
Active Voice
Do: "Competitors reduced prices 20%" Don't: "Prices were reduced by competitors by 20%"
Quantify Claims
Do: "Revenue grew 45% YoY to $2.3B" Don't: "Revenue grew significantly"
Hedge Appropriately
- •"Data suggests..." (uncertain)
- •"Evidence indicates..." (moderate confidence)
- •"Analysis confirms..." (high confidence)
Visualization Guidelines
When to Use Charts
| Data Type | Best Visualization |
|---|---|
| Comparison | Bar chart |
| Trend over time | Line chart |
| Composition | Pie chart (≤6 slices) |
| Relationship | Scatter plot |
| Distribution | Histogram |
| Process/Flow | Flowchart |
| Positioning | Quadrant/matrix |
| Scenarios | State diagram |
Mermaid Diagram Types
Quadrant Chart - Positioning
quadrantChart
title Market Positioning
x-axis Low Price --> High Price
y-axis Low Features --> High Features
quadrant-1 Premium
quadrant-2 Leaders
quadrant-3 Budget
quadrant-4 Value
State Diagram - Scenarios
stateDiagram-v2
[*] --> Current
Current --> Growth
Current --> Decline
Pie Chart - Share
pie title Market Share
"Leader" : 40
"Challenger" : 30
"Others" : 30
Table Best Practices
- •Left-align text, right-align numbers
- •Include units in headers
- •Use consistent decimal places
- •Highlight key rows/values
- •Keep to essential columns
Audience Tailoring
For Executives
- •Bottom-line first
- •Minimal jargon
- •Focus on decisions
- •Include recommendations
- •1-page max per topic
For Technical Audiences
- •Include methodology
- •Show data sources
- •Explain assumptions
- •Provide detail levels
For Investors
- •Lead with opportunity size
- •Highlight competitive advantage
- •Address risks prominently
- •Include financial metrics
For Product Teams
- •Focus on customer insights
- •Include competitive features
- •Provide prioritization guidance
- •Connect to roadmap
Quality Checklist
Before finalizing:
Content
- • Executive summary captures all key points
- • Claims supported by evidence
- • Sources cited appropriately
- • Recommendations are actionable
- • Risks addressed
Structure
- • Logical flow
- • Consistent heading hierarchy
- • Appropriate section lengths
- • Appendix for detail overflow
Clarity
- • Active voice used
- • Jargon minimized or explained
- • Numbers formatted consistently
- • Visuals have titles and labels
Formatting
- • Consistent styling
- • Tables render correctly
- • Diagrams are clear
- • Page breaks sensible
Output Formats
Markdown
- •Universal compatibility
- •Version control friendly
- •Easy to convert
- •Mermaid diagrams embedded
HTML
- •Styled presentation
- •Print-ready
- •Interactive potential
- •Rendered diagrams
- •Final distribution
- •Locked formatting
- •Professional appearance
Common Mistakes
- •Starting with methodology (put in appendix)
- •Too much hedge language (undermines confidence)
- •Orphan findings (every finding needs "so what")
- •Wall of text (use bullets, tables, visuals)
- •Missing recommendations (analysis without action)
Additional Resources
For detailed templates, see:
- •
templates/report-template.md- Full report template with variables - •
templates/executive-brief.md- Executive brief template - •
references/report-templates.md- Format templates - •
references/visualization-guide.md- Chart selection - •
examples/executive-brief.md- Sample brief - •
examples/full-report.md- Sample full report