Review Draft

Comprehensive writing review using specialized critics.

Arguments

Parse from provided arguments:

• •File path: First non-flag argument (required)
• •--critics=: Comma-separated list of critics to run (default: all four)
  • •clarity - Sentence-level readability
  • •narrative - Structure and argument flow
  • •facts - Claim verification and citations
  • •redteam - Counterexamples and objections
• •--sensitivity=: conservative|balanced|aggressive (default: balanced)

Workflow

1. •Parse arguments from above
2. •Validate file exists - error if not found
3. •Ask for target audience using AskUserQuestion (required for all critics)
4. •Create feedback directory - ensure feedback/ exists in draft's directory
5. •Dispatch selected critics in parallel using Task tool
6. •Summarize - report completion and highlight top issue from each

Agent Dispatch

Launch agents in parallel using Task tool with these prompts:

Where {name} is the draft filename without extension.

Agent prompt template:

Review the draft at {file_path} for {audience}.
Sensitivity: {sensitivity}
Write feedback to feedback/{name}_{type}.md

Post-Review Summary

## Review Complete

Feedback written to `feedback/`:
{list files created}

**Start with**: {most impactful issue from any critic}

Error Handling

Examples

/review-draft paper.md                              # All 4 critics
/review-draft paper.md --critics=clarity            # Just clarity
/review-draft paper.md --critics=clarity,facts      # Clarity + facts
/review-draft paper.md --sensitivity=aggressive     # Stricter review