Podcast Episode Planner Skill
Purpose: Transform research materials into a structured episode plan that guides NotebookLM's two-host audio generation.
When to Use: After research is complete (Phase 7 report.md exists) and before audio generation. This skill creates content_plan.md - the structural blueprint that NotebookLM uses to create coherent, well-organized podcast audio.
Skill Overview
This skill produces a structured episode plan that:
- •Classifies the episode type and selects appropriate toolkit elements
- •Structures content across three sections (Foundation, Evidence, Application)
- •Identifies key terms, studies, and narrative elements to emphasize
- •Provides guidance for NotebookLM's two-host conversation format
Key Principles:
- •Plans provide structural guidance for NotebookLM, not verbatim scripts
- •Section 1 introduces concepts and methodology — conclusions come later
- •Acronyms must be spelled out on first use ("polyunsaturated fatty acids, or PUFA")
- •Use metric units or intuitive measures ("handful", "palm-sized") — not imperial
Inputs Required
Before invoking this skill, gather:
1. Episode Metadata
topic: "[Specific topic/angle]" core_question: "[The single question this episode answers]" title: "[Episode title]"
2. Series Context (if applicable)
series_name: "[Series name]" series_question: "[Core question the series answers]" position: "[opener | middle | closer | standalone]" episode_number: [N]
3. Source Material (from report.md and p3-briefing.md)
key_studies:
- name: "[Study name/author/year]"
finding: "[Key finding]"
strength: "[Meta-analysis | RCT | Observational | etc]"
surprising_findings:
- "[Finding that challenges assumptions]"
contradictions:
- topic: "[Where sources disagree]"
resolution: "[How to present this]"
practical_protocols:
- "[Actionable insight with specific parameters]"
Planning Process
Step 1: Episode Classification
## Episode Classification - **Series Position:** [opener / middle / closer / standalone] - **Evidence Status:** [consensus / minor conflict / major conflict] - **Content Density:** [concept-heavy / protocol-heavy / balanced]
Step 2: Toolkit Selection
Opening Hook (choose ONE):
| Hook Type | Use When... |
|---|---|
| Provocative Question | Research contradicts conventional wisdom |
| Surprising Statistic | You have a striking number that reframes the topic |
| Bold Claim | Listeners will gain clear actionable knowledge |
| Counterintuitive Claim | Experts have been wrong and you can show why |
| Stakes Establishment | Health/business risk, time-sensitive topics |
Takeaway Structure (choose ONE):
| Structure | Best For |
|---|---|
| Numbered Protocol | Sequential actions where order matters |
| Prioritized Single Action | One intervention dominates |
| Tiered Recommendations | Optimal action depends on baseline |
| Conditional Protocol | Context determines best action |
Contradiction Handling (if evidence contested):
| Status | Approach |
|---|---|
| Consensus | Standard presentation |
| Minor conflict | Brief acknowledgment |
| Substantive conflict | Present both perspectives with context |
Step 3: Section Planning
Section 1: Foundation
Focus: WHY - Introduce concepts and research methodology. Save conclusions for later.
Plan:
- •Opening hook content
- •Key concepts to introduce (2-3 max)
- •Terms that MUST be defined (with pronunciation if unusual)
- •Analogies to anchor abstract concepts
- •Transition to Section 2
Section 2: Evidence
Focus: WHAT - Present the research findings.
Plan:
- •Key studies to highlight (with institution, year, sample size)
- •Evidence clusters (group related findings)
- •Where evidence agrees vs. conflicts
- •Callbacks to Section 1 concepts
- •Transition to Section 3
Section 3: Application
Focus: HOW - Translate findings to action.
Plan:
- •Specific protocols with parameters (timing, frequency, dosage)
- •Who this applies to / caveats
- •Callback to opening hook (complete the arc)
- •Final synthesis
Step 4: State Tracking
Track what's been established to enable callbacks:
- •Terms defined: [list - can use freely after definition]
- •Concepts established: [list - can callback without re-explaining]
- •Open loops: [questions raised that must be answered by end]
Step 5: Quality Check
Before finalizing, verify:
- • Three sections with clear focus (Foundation/Evidence/Application)
- • Maximum 3-4 major concepts per section
- • All key terms listed with definitions
- • Protocols include specific parameters
- • Opening hook connects to closing callback
- • Episode answers its stated core question
Output Format
Produce content_plan.md in this structure:
# Episode Plan: [Episode Title]
## Episode Metadata
- **Series:** [Series name or "Standalone"]
- **Position:** [Opener / Middle / Closer / Standalone]
- **Core Question:** [The question this episode answers]
- **Episode Type:** [Evidence status] + [Content density]
## Toolkit Selections
- **Hook Type:** [Selected hook]
- **Takeaway Structure:** [Selected structure]
- **Contradiction Handling:** [Approach if applicable]
---
## NotebookLM Guidance
### Opening Instructions
[Specific guidance for how the hosts should open - the hook to use, tone to set]
### Key Terms to Define
| Term | Definition | Pronunciation (if needed) |
|------|------------|---------------------------|
| [Term 1] | [Clear definition] | [e.g., "poo-fah" for PUFA] |
| [Term 2] | [Clear definition] | |
### Studies to Emphasize
1. **[Study name, Institution, Year]** - [Key finding to highlight]
- Sample size: [N]
- Why it matters: [Context]
2. **[Study name]** - [Key finding]
### Narrative Arc
**Section 1: Foundation**
- Primary focus: [What concept/mechanism to establish]
- Key analogy: "[Everyday comparison to anchor the concept]"
- Transition hook: [How to move to evidence]
**Section 2: Evidence**
- Evidence cluster A: [Studies supporting point 1]
- Evidence cluster B: [Studies supporting point 2]
- Conflict to address: [If any, how to present it]
- Callback opportunity: "[Reference to Section 1 concept]"
**Section 3: Application**
- Protocol 1: [Specific action with parameters]
- Timing: [Specific]
- Frequency: [Specific]
- Who: [Target population]
- Protocol 2: [If applicable]
- Caveats: [Important limitations]
### Closing Instructions
- Callback to opening: [How to reference the opening hook]
- Key takeaway: [Single most important point]
- Sign-off: "Find the full research and sources at research dot yuda dot me—that's Y-U-D-A dot M-E."
---
## Specificity Standards
The hosts should use specific parameters throughout:
| Category | Vague (Avoid) | Specific (Use) |
|----------|---------------|----------------|
| Timing | "in the morning" | "90-120 minutes after waking" |
| Frequency | "regularly" | "3 times per week" |
| Citations | "some studies show" | "A 2023 meta-analysis of 47 trials found" |
| Effects | "significant improvement" | "17% reduction in all-cause mortality" |
| Dosage | "take some magnesium" | "300-400mg magnesium glycinate" |
---
## Attention Maintenance Notes
Remind hosts to:
- Rotate content types every 5-7 minutes (explanation → example → insight)
- Use pattern interrupts every 7-10 minutes
- Signpost major transitions ("Key point here...", "This brings us to...")
- Close any open loops before episode end
Templates
Opening Hook Templates
Provocative Question:
"What if everything you believe about [topic] is fundamentally wrong?"
Surprising Statistic:
"[Specific number] [unexpected comparison]. That's [X times more/less] than [common assumption]."
Bold Claim:
"By the end of this episode, you'll understand exactly how to [specific outcome]."
Counterintuitive Claim:
"The experts have been wrong about this for decades. And the data finally shows us why."
Stakes Establishment:
"This single [factor] predicts [outcome] better than any other—and most people are getting it completely wrong."
Series Modifier Templates
Series Frame Opening:
"This is the [ordinal] episode in our series on [topic]. Today, we're looking at it through the lens of [perspective]."
Series Wrap (closer):
"This concludes our series on [topic]. Together, these perspectives give you a complete framework for [core question]."
Callback Templates
- •"As we covered earlier, [concept]—this is exactly why [new point]."
- •"Remember the mechanism we discussed? This study shows it in action."
- •"This brings us back to [opening hook reference]. Now you understand why."
Integration with NotebookLM
The content_plan.md file is uploaded to NotebookLM along with:
- •
research/p1-brief.md- Research brief - •
report.md- Narrative synthesis - •
research/p3-briefing.md- Master briefing - •
sources.md- Validated citations
NotebookLM uses content_plan.md to:
- •Structure the conversation flow
- •Know which terms to define and when
- •Emphasize the right studies
- •Create coherent narrative arc with callbacks
- •Deliver specific, actionable protocols
The episodeFocus prompt in the NotebookLM API provides additional guidance on tone and style.
Skill Version: 3.0 Output: content_plan.md only (NotebookLM guidance)