Persona Docs
Create user-centered documentation that defines who a product is for and how they interact with it. Persona docs establish the foundation for product-driven development — every feature decision, design choice, and prioritization call flows from understanding your users.
Installation
OpenClaw / Moltbot / Clawbot
npx clawhub@latest install persona-docs
When to Create
Persona docs should be the first thing fleshed out for any product. Even minimal documentation about who uses the product helps direct development and design decisions.
- •Project inception — before writing code, define who you're building for
- •Pivoting to a new audience — document the shift so the team aligns
- •Team lacks clarity on target users — when people disagree on "who is this for?"
- •Before major feature planning — validate that planned features serve actual users
- •New team member onboarding — give them context on who they're building for
Process
- •Analyze the codebase — look for existing documentation, README, landing pages, or marketing copy that hints at the target audience
- •Ask clarifying questions if the target user isn't clear:
- •"Who is the primary user of this product?"
- •"What problem does this solve for them?"
- •"How would they discover this product?"
- •"What's the first thing they'd do after finding it?"
- •Start minimal — a few sentences per section is better than nothing
- •Read the template — see
references/template.mdfor the full structure - •Iterate — revisit and expand as you learn more about actual users
Core Components
1. Target User Profile
Who they are, their background, their context. Be specific enough to be useful.
Good: "Backend engineers at mid-size SaaS companies who debug production issues under time pressure, typically 3-8 years of experience, comfortable with command-line tools."
Too vague: "Developers."
Include:
- •Role, job title, or archetype
- •Technical level and relevant skills
- •Industry or domain context
- •When and where they'd use this product
- •Team size and organizational context
2. User Needs and Pain Points
The problems this product solves. What frustrations or gaps exist in their current workflow?
Structure as:
- •Primary pain point — the single biggest problem you solve
- •Secondary pain points — additional problems you address
- •Current workarounds — what they do today without your product
- •Why existing solutions fail — what alternatives exist and why they're insufficient
3. Discovery Path
How they find the product. This informs marketing, positioning, and first-impression design.
- •Search — what queries lead them here?
- •Referral — word of mouth, colleague recommendation?
- •Content — blog posts, tutorials, conference talks?
- •Marketplace — app store, plugin directory, package registry?
- •The hook — what makes them click "sign up" or "download"?
4. Onboarding Flow
The simplest possible path from "I found this" to "I'm getting value."
Define:
- •First encounter — landing page, app store listing, GitHub README
- •Registration/Login — minimum viable auth (email-only? OAuth? no account?)
- •Time to value — how quickly can they experience the core benefit?
- •First success moment — the specific action that makes them think "this is useful"
- •Friction points — where do users drop off, and how do you minimize that?
Example flow:
User lands on homepage → clicks "Try it" → pastes their data → sees result in <30 seconds → decides to create account
5. User Journey Map
Key touchpoints and interactions across the user lifecycle.
New User (Day 1):
- •Discovers product via [channel]
- •Takes [first action]
- •Achieves [first success]
Returning User (Week 1):
- •Key repeated action they perform
- •Features they explore
- •Integrations or customizations they set up
Power User (Month 1+):
- •Advanced features they rely on
- •Workflows they've established
- •How they'd describe the product to others
6. Feature Touchpoints
Map where users encounter key features in their journey:
| Feature | When Encountered | User Need at That Moment |
|---|---|---|
| [Feature 1] | [Journey stage] | [What they're trying to do] |
| [Feature 2] | [Journey stage] | [What they're trying to do] |
Multi-Persona Products
If your product serves multiple distinct user types:
- •Identify the primary persona first — who must you serve to survive?
- •Document secondary personas separately — one file per persona
- •Note conflicts — where persona needs clash, document the tradeoff
- •Prioritize ruthlessly — you can't optimize for everyone simultaneously
Output Location
Place persona docs at:
- •
docs/PERSONA.md— single file for simple products - •
docs/personas/— directory for multiple personas
Keep it in the repo so it evolves with the product.
Quality Criteria
A good persona doc should:
- •Be specific enough that two team members would build the same feature from it
- •Include evidence — data, quotes, or observations, not just assumptions
- •Be actionable — reading it should change how you build
- •Be maintained — outdated personas are worse than none
- •Be honest — don't describe aspirational users; describe actual users
NEVER Do
- •NEVER skip personas for a new product — building without knowing your user is guessing, and guessing is expensive
- •NEVER describe users as demographics alone — "25-34 male" tells you nothing about what they need; describe behaviors and goals
- •NEVER create personas in isolation — involve the team; one person's assumptions become the whole product's blind spots
- •NEVER treat personas as permanent — users change, markets shift; review personas quarterly
- •NEVER create more than 3 personas initially — if you try to serve everyone, you serve no one; start with your primary user
- •NEVER write aspirational personas — document who actually uses your product, not who you wish did