Workflow Patterns
Implement tasks systematically using TDD (Test-Driven Development) with phase checkpoints and verification protocols. Ensures quality at every step.
Installation
OpenClaw / Moltbot / Clawbot
npx clawhub@latest install workflow-patterns
WHAT This Skill Does
Provides a structured approach to implementing tasks:
- •TDD cycle (red → green → refactor) for each task
- •Quality gates (tests, coverage, linting) before marking complete
- •Phase checkpoints requiring user approval
- •Git commits with rich metadata for traceability
WHEN to Use
Use for:
- •Implementing features from a plan
- •Following TDD methodology
- •Tasks requiring quality verification
- •Projects with coverage requirements
- •Team workflows needing traceability
Skip for:
- •Quick fixes or trivial changes
- •Exploratory prototyping
- •Projects without test infrastructure
Keywords: TDD, implementation, testing, coverage, checkpoints, verification, red-green-refactor
The TDD Task Lifecycle
11 steps for each task:
Step 1: Select Next Task
Read the plan and identify the next pending [ ] task. Select tasks in order within the current phase. Do not skip ahead.
Step 2: Mark as In Progress
Update the plan to mark the task as [~]:
- [~] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation
Step 3: RED — Write Failing Tests
Write tests that define expected behavior before implementation:
- •Create test file if needed
- •Cover happy path
- •Cover edge cases
- •Cover error conditions
- •Run tests — they should FAIL
def test_validate_email_valid():
user = User(email="test@example.com")
assert user.validate_email() is True
def test_validate_email_invalid():
user = User(email="invalid")
assert user.validate_email() is False
Step 4: GREEN — Implement Minimum Code
Write the minimum code to make tests pass:
- •Focus on making tests green, not perfection
- •Avoid premature optimization
- •Keep implementation simple
- •Run tests — they should PASS
Step 5: REFACTOR — Improve Clarity
With green tests, improve the code:
- •Extract common patterns
- •Improve naming
- •Remove duplication
- •Simplify logic
- •Run tests after each change — must stay GREEN
Step 6: Verify Coverage
Check test coverage meets the 80% target:
pytest --cov=module --cov-report=term-missing
If coverage is below 80%:
- •Identify uncovered lines
- •Add tests for missing paths
- •Re-run coverage check
Step 7: Document Deviations
If implementation deviated from plan or added dependencies:
- •Update tech-stack.md with new dependencies
- •Note deviations in plan task comments
- •Update spec if requirements changed
Step 8: Commit Implementation
Create focused commit:
git commit -m "feat(user): implement email validation - Add validate_email method to User class - Handle empty and malformed emails - Add comprehensive test coverage Task: 2.1"
Step 9: Update Plan with SHA
Mark task complete with commit SHA:
- [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation `abc1234`
Step 10: Commit Plan Update
git commit -m "docs: update plan - task 2.1 complete"
Step 11: Repeat
Continue to next task until phase is complete.
Phase Completion Protocol
When all tasks in a phase are complete:
1. Identify Changed Files
git diff --name-only <last-checkpoint-sha>..HEAD
2. Ensure Test Coverage
For each modified file:
- •Verify tests exist for new/changed code
- •Run coverage for modified modules
- •Add tests if coverage < 80%
3. Run Full Test Suite
pytest -v --tb=short
All tests must pass.
4. Generate Verification Checklist
## Phase 1 Verification - [ ] User can register with valid email - [ ] Invalid email shows appropriate error - [ ] Database stores user correctly
5. WAIT for User Approval
Present checklist:
Phase 1 complete. Please verify: 1. [x] Test suite passes (automated) 2. [x] Coverage meets target (automated) 3. [ ] Manual verification items (requires human) Respond with 'approved' to continue.
Do NOT proceed without explicit approval.
6. Create Checkpoint Commit
git commit -m "checkpoint: phase 1 complete Verified: - All tests passing - Coverage: 87% - Manual verification approved"
7. Record Checkpoint SHA
Update plan checkpoints table:
## Checkpoints | Phase | SHA | Date | Status | |---------|---------|------------|----------| | Phase 1 | def5678 | 2025-01-15 | verified | | Phase 2 | | | pending |
Quality Gates
Before marking any task complete:
| Gate | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Tests | All existing tests pass, new tests pass |
| Coverage | New code has 80%+ coverage |
| Linting | No linter errors |
| Types | Type checker passes (if applicable) |
| Security | No secrets in code, input validation present |
Git Commit Format
<type>(<scope>): <subject> <body> Task: <task-id>
Types:
- •
feat— New feature - •
fix— Bug fix - •
refactor— Code change without feature/fix - •
test— Adding tests - •
docs— Documentation - •
chore— Maintenance
Handling Deviations
Scope Addition
Discovered requirement not in spec:
- •Document in spec as new requirement
- •Add tasks to plan
- •Note addition in task comments
Scope Reduction
Feature deemed unnecessary:
- •Mark tasks as
[-](skipped) with reason - •Update spec scope section
- •Document decision rationale
Technical Deviation
Different approach than planned:
- •Note deviation in task comment
- •Update tech-stack.md if dependencies changed
- •Document why original approach was unsuitable
- [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement validation `abc1234` - DEVIATION: Used library instead of custom code - Reason: Better edge case handling - Impact: Added email-validator to dependencies
Error Recovery
Tests Fail After GREEN
- •Do NOT proceed to REFACTOR
- •Identify which test started failing
- •Revert to last known GREEN state
- •Re-approach the implementation
Checkpoint Rejected
- •Note rejection reason in plan
- •Create tasks to address issues
- •Complete remediation tasks
- •Request checkpoint approval again
Blocked by Dependency
- •Mark task as
[!]with blocker description - •Check if other tasks can proceed
- •Document expected resolution
Task Status Symbols
| Symbol | Meaning |
|---|---|
[ ] | Pending |
[~] | In progress |
[x] | Complete |
[-] | Skipped |
[!] | Blocked |
Best Practices
- •Never skip RED — Always write failing tests first
- •Small commits — One logical change per commit
- •Immediate updates — Update plan right after task completion
- •Wait for approval — Never skip checkpoint verification
- •Coverage discipline — Don't accept below target
- •Sequential phases — Complete phases in order
- •Document deviations — Note any changes from plan
- •Clean state — Each commit leaves code working
NEVER Do
- •NEVER skip the RED phase — writing tests first is non-negotiable in TDD
- •NEVER proceed past checkpoints without approval — wait for explicit user confirmation
- •NEVER commit code that doesn't pass tests — every commit must be a working state
- •NEVER accept coverage below 80% — add tests until threshold is met
- •NEVER hide deviations from the plan — document all changes from original spec
- •NEVER skip phases or reorder them — phases are sequential for a reason
- •NEVER forget to record commit SHAs — traceability requires linking tasks to commits