Gate 7: Decision Capture
Purpose: Human makes the final decision with the full picture documented.
Announce: "Final Gate - time to decide."
Entry Criteria
- •Synthesis Gate completed
- •All prior gates documented in artifact
- •Recommendation and alternatives clearly articulated
Process
Step 1: Present Summary
Provide a concise decision summary consolidating all prior work:
## DECISION SUMMARY **DECISION**: [One-line statement of the decision to be made] **ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED**: 1. [Option A] - [One-line summary] 2. [Option B] - [One-line summary] 3. [Option C] - [One-line summary] **RECOMMENDATION**: [Recommended option with brief rationale] **MUST-BE-TRUE**: - [Critical assumption 1] - [Critical assumption 2] **TOP RISKS**: 1. [Risk 1] - [Mitigation] 2. [Risk 2] - [Mitigation] **EXIT TRIGGERS**: - [Condition that would reverse this decision] - [Condition that would reverse this decision]
Step 2: Human Decides
Ask the decision maker:
"What is your decision?"
- •Accept recommendation - Proceed with the recommended option
- •Choose different alternative - Select a different option from those considered
- •Defer - Postpone decision (specify timeline and trigger for revisiting)
- •Cancel - Abandon decision process (document why)
Wait for explicit human choice. Do not proceed without clear direction.
Step 3: Document Rationale
Capture the decision context through targeted questions:
- •What was decided? - The specific choice made
- •Why this option? - Core reasoning
- •What clinched it? - The deciding factor(s)
- •Concerns remaining? - Known risks being accepted
- •When to revisit? - Review trigger or timeline
Record responses verbatim where possible - the decision maker's own words carry weight.
Step 4: Finalize Artifact
Complete the decision document with final sections:
## DECISION **Status**: DECIDED **Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD] **Decision Maker**: [Name/Role] **Weight**: [Light/Medium/Complete] **Upgraded**: [Yes - from X at Gate Y / No] ### CHOSEN OPTION [Selected alternative with full description] ### RATIONALE [Why this option was selected - captured from Step 3] ### DECIDING FACTORS - [Factor 1 that tipped the balance] - [Factor 2 that tipped the balance] ### REMAINING CONCERNS - [Accepted risk or uncertainty 1] - [Accepted risk or uncertainty 2] ### NEXT REVIEW **Review Date**: [Date or "When triggered"] **Review Triggers**: - [Condition requiring earlier review] - [Exit trigger from earlier analysis] --- ## Document History | Date | Gate | Summary | |------|------|---------| | [Date] | Thesis | [Brief summary] | | [Date] | Landscape | [Brief summary] | | [Date] | Research | [Brief summary] | | [Date] | Calibration | [Brief summary] | | [Date] | Contrarian | [Brief summary] | | [Date] | Synthesis | [Brief summary] | | [Date] | Decision | Decision finalized |
Step 5: Commit and Close
Save the completed artifact:
docs/decisions/YYYY-MM-DD-<decision-slug>/decision.md
Where <decision-slug> is a kebab-case summary of the decision topic.
Inform the decision maker:
"Decision captured and committed. Available commands:
- •
/advocate- Generate arguments supporting this decision- •
/detract- Generate arguments challenging this decision- •
/review-decision- Structured review when conditions change"
Depth by Weight
| Aspect | Light | Medium | Complete |
|---|---|---|---|
| Summary | One paragraph | Standard format | Full decision summary |
| Rationale capture | Brief (1-2 sentences) | Key factors | Verbatim + deciding factors |
| Documentation | Minimal artifact | Standard artifact | Complete artifact |
| History | Gates listed | Gates + summaries | Full gate history |
Light: Quick summary, brief rationale capture, minimal but complete artifact.
Medium: Standard summary format, key factors captured, full artifact.
Complete: Comprehensive summary, verbatim rationale capture, complete artifact with full gate history.
Exit Criteria
- • Decision explicitly stated by human
- • Rationale documented (depth per weight)
- • Artifact complete with all required sections
- • Document saved to
docs/decisions/directory - • Decision maker informed of post-decision commands
Post-Decision Support
After a decision is captured, several follow-up capabilities remain available:
/advocate
Generate compelling arguments in favor of the decision. Useful for:
- •Building stakeholder buy-in
- •Preparing presentations
- •Strengthening commitment
/detract
Generate thoughtful challenges to the decision. Useful for:
- •Stress-testing before announcement
- •Preparing for objections
- •Maintaining intellectual honesty
/review-decision
Structured process for revisiting decisions when:
- •Exit triggers activate
- •Scheduled review date arrives
- •Circumstances materially change
These commands work with the saved artifact to provide context-aware support.