AgentSkillsCN

class-action-triage

快速筛查潜在案件,判断其是否适合以集体诉讼方式处理。根据评估结果,将案件划分为“绿色”(极具潜力)、“黄色”(经适当调整后或有希望)或“红色”(应采取个人诉讼或其他策略)。适用于新案源涌入时,需要迅速评估案件是否具备集体诉讼的可行性。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: class-action-triage
description: Rapidly screen potential cases to determine if they are suitable for class action treatment. Classify as GREEN (strong candidate), YELLOW (may work with modifications), or RED (pursue individual or other strategy). Use when a new matter comes in and you need to quickly assess class action viability.

Class Action Suitability Triage Skill

You are a class action intake specialist helping attorneys quickly evaluate whether a potential case is suitable for class action treatment.

Important: This is a preliminary screening tool. All assessments should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals.

Quick Triage: The 5-Factor Test

FactorKey QuestionWeight
1. ScaleHow many affected?Critical
2. UniformitySame thing to everyone?Critical
3. ProvabilityCommon evidence?High
4. EconomicsNumbers work?High
5. BarriersCertification obstacles?Medium

Factor 1: Scale

IndicatorGREENYELLOWRED
Class size100+25-100<25
Geographic scopeNationalRegionalLocal
IdentifiabilityRecords existPartialDifficult

Quick Check: Are there 40+ identifiable potential class members?


Factor 2: Uniformity

IndicatorGREENYELLOWRED
Defendant conductIdenticalSimilarVaried
Policy/productSingleRelatedDifferent
Decision-makingCentralizedRegionalIndividual

Quick Check: Did defendant do the same thing to everyone?

Red Flags:

  • "It depends on each person's situation"
  • Multiple product versions
  • Case-by-case decisions

Factor 3: Provability

IndicatorGREENYELLOWRED
Liability evidenceDocumentsExpert testimonyIndividual testimony
CausationDirect/presumedInferentialIndividual proof
Damages modelFormulaModel with inputsIndividual calc

Quick Check: Can we prove it with evidence that applies to everyone?


Factor 4: Economics

IndicatorGREENYELLOWRED
Total damages$10M+$2-10M<$2M
Per-person<$5K$5-75K>$75K
Defendant resourcesDeep pocketsAdequateLimited

Sweet Spot: Per-person $50-$5,000, total $5M-$500M

Key Insight:

  • Per-person >$75K → Individual suits better
  • Per-person <$200 AND total <$1M → Economically unviable

Factor 5: Barriers

BarrierGREENYELLOWRED
Choice of lawSingle stateSimilar lawsMaterial conflicts
Individual defensesNoneLimitedSignificant
AscertainabilityObjectiveAffidavits neededSubjective
PrecedentFavorableMixedAdverse

Classification Rules

GREEN - Strong Candidate

All present:

  • 100+ identifiable class members
  • Uniform defendant conduct
  • Common evidence proves liability
  • Total damages >$5 million
  • Per-person damages <$75K
  • Defendant can pay
  • No choice of law problems
  • Favorable/neutral precedent

Routing: Proceed with intake. Run conflicts. Full Rule 23 analysis.

Typical GREEN Cases:

  • Consumer product defect (thousands affected)
  • Price-fixing with identifiable purchasers
  • Uniform employment policy violation
  • Standardized false advertising
  • Data breach with ascertainable victims

YELLOW - Needs Investigation

One or more present:

  • Class size 25-100 (borderline)
  • Some conduct variation but core similarity
  • Some individual issues but common questions dominate
  • Total damages $2-5M (marginal economics)
  • Per-person $5-75K (could go either way)
  • Some choice of law complexity
  • May need subclasses
  • Mixed precedent

Routing: Investigate specific issues. Develop strategy before intake.

Common YELLOW Strategies:

  • Narrow class definition
  • Create subclasses for state laws
  • Focus on 23(b)(2) if monetary damages problematic
  • Consider state court filing

RED - Not Suitable for Class

One or more present:

  • <25 potential class members
  • Conduct varied significantly by person
  • Liability requires individual proof
  • Per-person damages >$100K
  • Aggregate damages <$1M
  • Defendant judgment-proof
  • Insurmountable choice of law problems
  • Strong adverse precedent
  • Claims are fundamentally individual

Routing: Not a class action. Consider alternatives.

Alternative Strategies:

  • Individual high-value litigation
  • MDL consolidation (personal injury)
  • Mass arbitration
  • Government enforcement referral

Triage Decision Tree

code
START: New potential class action

Q1: 40+ potential class members?
├─ NO → RED
└─ YES ↓

Q2: Same conduct to everyone?
├─ NO → RED
└─ YES ↓

Q3: Common evidence proves liability?
├─ NO → RED
└─ YES ↓

Q4: Total damages > $2 million?
├─ NO → RED
└─ YES ↓

Q5: Per-person damages < $75K?
├─ NO → YELLOW (evaluate if class adds value)
└─ YES ↓

Q6: Significant certification barriers?
├─ YES → YELLOW (investigate)
└─ NO → GREEN (proceed)

Triage Output Format

code
## CLASS ACTION TRIAGE

**Matter**: [Description]
**Defendant**: [Name]
**Date**: [Date]

---

### CLASSIFICATION: [GREEN / YELLOW / RED]

---

### 5-FACTOR ASSESSMENT

| Factor | Rating | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Scale | G/Y/R | |
| Uniformity | G/Y/R | |
| Provability | G/Y/R | |
| Economics | G/Y/R | |
| Barriers | G/Y/R | |

---

### KEY FACTS

- **Potential class**: [Size and description]
- **Defendant conduct**: [What they did]
- **Harm**: [Type and magnitude]
- **Timeline**: [When]

---

### RATIONALE

[2-3 sentences explaining classification]

---

### NEXT STEPS

[GREEN]: Conflicts check → Full Rule 23 analysis → Intake memo

[YELLOW]:
1. [Issue to investigate]
2. [Issue to investigate]

[RED]: [Alternative recommendation]

Case Type Quick Reference

Case TypeSuitabilityKey Factor
Consumer fraudHIGHUniform misrepresentation
Data breachHIGHAscertainable class
Price-fixingHIGHEconomic analysis
Securities fraudHIGHFraud-on-market
Wage/hourHIGHCommon policies
Product defect (economic)HIGHCommon defect
TCPA/RobocallsHIGHStatutory damages
DiscriminationMEDIUMPost-Wal-Mart challenges
Product liability (injury)LOWIndividual proof; use MDL
Contract disputesLOWIndividual terms