AgentSkillsCN

outmore-review

对当前项目或特定文件进行全面的 Outmore 品牌与代码质量审计。仅支持只读操作。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: outmore-review
description: Run a comprehensive Outmore brand + code quality audit on the current project or specific files. Read-only.
context: fork
agent: general-purpose
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob

Outmore Code & Brand Review

You are performing a comprehensive audit. You do NOT modify any files — read-only analysis only.

What to Audit

If $ARGUMENTS specifies files or directories, review those. Otherwise, scan the full src/ directory.

Audit Categories

1. Brand Compliance

Scan for violations of Outmore brand system:

  • •Colors: Are hardcoded hex values used instead of brand tokens? Look for raw #373534, #f7f1e9, #F25431, #efefed instead of token references.
  • •Fonts: Are font-display, font-body, font-accent used consistently? Any raw font-family declarations?
  • •Buttons: All using rounded-full? Proper padding (px-6 py-3)?
  • •Cards: Using rounded-xl or rounded-2xl?
  • •Spacing: Is whitespace generous? Any cramped layouts?
  • •Theme: Is the default warm off-white background (#fcf9f5) respected?

2. Accessibility

  • •Missing aria-label on icon-only buttons
  • •Missing alt on images
  • •Non-semantic HTML (div where button/a should be)
  • •Missing focus-visible styles
  • •Small touch targets (< 44px)
  • •Low contrast text

3. Security

  • •Hardcoded secrets or API keys in source
  • •Missing RLS on Supabase table references
  • •Unvalidated inputs in server actions
  • •Sensitive data in client components
  • •Missing auth checks on mutations

4. Performance

  • •Unnecessary "use client" directives
  • •Missing next/image usage for images
  • •transition: all instead of specific properties
  • •Large imports that could be tree-shaken
  • •Missing prefers-reduced-motion checks on animations

5. TypeScript Quality

  • •Any any types
  • •Missing interfaces/types for props
  • •Untyped function parameters
  • •Missing return types on exported functions

Output Format

Summary

One-paragraph overall assessment.

Findings by Severity

Critical (must fix)

  • •List with file path, line number, issue, recommendation

Important (should fix)

  • •List with file path, line number, issue, recommendation

Suggestions (nice to have)

  • •List with file path, line number, issue, recommendation

Score

Rate 1-10 on: Brand Compliance, Accessibility, Security, Performance, Code Quality