AgentSkillsCN

scientific-manuscript

为顶级期刊(如Nature、Science、Cell)打造高影响力科研论文。当用户提到“高影响力论文”“顶级期刊”“Nature”、“Science”、“Cell”、“Current Biology”、“eLife”等知名学术刊物时使用。提供关于叙事结构、行文风格、段落衔接、句法雕琢,以及修辞效果的反馈意见。 注意:本技能不适用于常规论文、低级别期刊、综述文章,或科研基金申请(此类任务可由专门的技能承担)。本技能专为那些致力于在最具竞争力的期刊上发表论文而设计——在这些期刊中,叙事弧线、简洁的行文,以及富有策略性的修辞表达,往往最为关键。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: scientific-manuscript
description: |
  High-impact scientific manuscript development for top-tier journals such as Nature, Science,
  and Cell. Use when the user mentions: high-impact paper, top-tier journal, Nature, Science,
  Cell, Current Biology, eLife, or similar prestigious venues. Provides feedback on narrative
  structure, prose style, paragraph flow, sentence-level craft, and rhetorical impact.

  NOT for: routine papers, lower-tier journals, review articles, or grant writing (separate
  skills may handle those). This skill is specifically for crafting papers aimed at the most
  competitive journals where narrative arc, concise prose, and strategic rhetoric matter most.

Scientific Manuscript Skill

Craft and refine manuscripts for high-impact journals through structured feedback, comparative analysis with exemplar papers, and sentence-level prose craft.

Core Focus Areas

This skill emphasizes four dimensions of high-impact writing:

  1. Narrative arc — how the story builds across sections and paragraphs
  2. Paragraph architecture — how individual paragraphs create momentum and impact
  3. Sentence-level craft — concise, punchy prose with word economy
  4. Strategic rhetoric — calculated use of adjectives and flourishes

Reference Files

Section-Specific Guides

SectionReference File
Abstractreferences/abstract.md
Introductionreferences/introduction.md
Resultsreferences/results.md
Discussionreferences/discussion.md
Methodsreferences/methods.md
Figuresreferences/figures.md

Craft-Level Guides (Load for any section)

FocusReference FileWhen to Load
Narrative structurereferences/narrative-structure.mdStory arc, section flow, momentum
Prose craftreferences/prose-craft.mdSentence-level style, word economy, rhetoric
Evaluationreferences/rubrics.mdSystematic scoring

Annotated Examples

PaperFileBest for
Musser 2021 Sciencereferences/examples/musser_2021_science.mdParadox hooks, cell type papers
Ruperti 2024 Curr Biolreferences/examples/ruperti_2024_curbio.mdChallenging paradigms, quantitative prose
Tarashansky 2021 eLifereferences/examples/tarashansky_2021_elife.mdMethods papers, comparative analysis
Vergara 2021 Cellreferences/examples/vergara_2021_cell.mdResource papers, multimodal data

Feedback Modes

Mode 1: Narrative Analysis

Analyze story arc and momentum. Use when:

  • Draft feels flat or disjointed
  • User asks about "flow" or "structure"
  • Sections don't build toward a conclusion

Load: references/narrative-structure.md

Format:

code
**Arc diagnosis**: [Where tension is established, where it resolves, what's missing]
**Momentum check**: [Which paragraphs build vs. stall]
**Pivot analysis**: [How you transition from known → unknown → your contribution]
**Suggested restructuring**: [Concrete reordering or additions]

Mode 2: Prose Craft Review

Sentence-level style analysis. Use when:

  • User asks about "style" or "writing quality"
  • Prose feels bloated or academic
  • User wants text to be "punchier" or "more concise"

Load: references/prose-craft.md

Format:

code
**Bloat patterns**: [Specific phrases to cut with rewrites]
**Verb weakness**: [Weak verbs → strong verb suggestions]
**Sentence rhythm**: [Where variation is needed]
**Adjective audit**: [Which add meaning vs. clutter]
**Power positions**: [Sentences where key info is buried]

Mode 3: Comparative Critique

Compare to exemplar papers. Use when:

  • User wants to see "how good papers do it"
  • Draft has rhetorical issues best shown by contrast

Load: Relevant example file from references/examples/

Format:

code
**Your draft**: [quote passage]
**Exemplar**: [quote from example paper]
**Key difference**: [What the exemplar does that yours doesn't]
**Principle**: [The generalizable technique]
**Suggested revision**: [Concrete rewrite applying the principle]

Mode 4: Rubric Evaluation

Systematic scoring. Use when:

  • User asks "Is this ready for submission?"
  • Comprehensive assessment needed

Load: references/rubrics.md

Mode 5: Iterative Dialogue

Socratic questioning. Use when:

  • Logic or argument needs development
  • User refining specific claims

Quick Diagnostics

The Arc Check

For any section, ask:

  1. Where is the tension established?
  2. Where does it resolve?
  3. Does each paragraph advance toward resolution?

The First/Last Test

  • First sentence of each paragraph: Does it state the main point?
  • Last sentence of the paper: Is it memorable and quotable?
  • Last sentence of each section: Does it transition or conclude powerfully?

The Economy Test

Flag these bloat patterns:

  • "It is important to note that" → [delete]
  • "plays a role in" → "regulates" / "drives"
  • "is involved in" → [specific verb]
  • "in order to" → "to"
  • Stacked adjectives → choose one

The Flourish Audit

Flourishes should appear at:

  • Paper opening (hook)
  • Key conceptual pivot
  • Paper closing (take-home)

NOT in: routine findings, methods, figure descriptions

Handling Requests

"Review my introduction" → Load introduction.md + narrative-structure.md, analyze arc and pivot, check prose craft

"Make this punchier" → Load prose-craft.md, do sentence-level audit, provide rewrites

"How does this compare to good examples?" → Load relevant example file, do comparative critique

"Is the narrative working?" → Load narrative-structure.md, analyze tension-resolution arc, check paragraph momentum

"Help me cut this down" → Load prose-craft.md, identify bloat patterns, suggest cuts with preserved meaning

"Is this ready for submission?" → Load rubrics.md + all relevant references, comprehensive evaluation

Output Principles

  1. Quote exactly: Reference specific passages from the draft
  2. Rewrite concretely: Don't just diagnose—show the fix
  3. Be honest: User wants critical feedback, not encouragement
  4. Prioritize: Identify 2-3 highest-impact changes
  5. Model excellence: Pull from exemplar papers to show what good looks like