Tune System
A meta-review skill that analyzes the automation system's own operation and makes conservative, evidence-based adjustments. Mirrors The Unfinishable Map's "Minimal Quantum Interaction" tenet: small, precise interventions with clear justification.
When to Use
- •Monthly maintenance: Runs on 30-day cadence (injected when 45 days overdue)
- •Post-milestone: After reaching convergence milestones (50%, 75%, etc.)
- •Manual invocation: When you notice operational issues
- •After significant failures: If failed_tasks count exceeds 5 in a session
Instructions
1. Load Data Sources
Read these files to gather operational data:
obsidian/workflow/evolution-state.yaml # Primary metrics obsidian/workflow/changelog.md # Execution history obsidian/workflow/todo.md # Task patterns obsidian/reviews/ # Recent review outputs obsidian/project/project-brief.md # Project goals (reference)
2. Check Abort Conditions
STOP and escalate to human if any of these are true:
- •More than 50% of recent tasks (last 10) failed
- •Convergence has regressed for 3+ consecutive sessions
- •
quality.critical_issues > 0 - •Any file read errors during analysis
If aborting, create a minimal report explaining why and skip to step 8.
3. Check Locked Settings
Read evolution-state.yaml for locked_settings section. These settings cannot be modified automatically—note them for the report.
4. Analyze Five Categories
A. Cadence Analysis
Compare last_runs timestamps against cadences settings:
- •Calculate days between actual runs for each maintenance task
- •Identify tasks frequently overdue (pattern: overdue in >60% of opportunities)
- •Identify tasks never reaching cadence (always run early)
Evidence required: 5+ data points (sessions) showing consistent pattern
B. Failure Pattern Analysis
Examine failed_tasks and recent_tasks:
- •Count failures by task type
- •Look for common error patterns
- •Identify environmental issues (missing files, API errors)
Evidence required: 3+ failures of same type or pattern
C. Queue Health Analysis
Examine queue_status and replenishment_source_counts:
- •Compare task sources (chain, research, gap, staleness) to execution rates
- •Check if certain sources produce tasks that never get executed
- •Monitor P3 promotion rate
Evidence required: 5+ sessions of queue data
D. Review Finding Patterns
Scan recent files in reviews/:
- •Identify issues raised multiple times but never addressed
- •Track issue resolution rate
- •Note recurring themes across pessimistic reviews
Evidence required: 3+ reviews showing same pattern
E. Convergence Progress
Analyze progress and quality metrics:
- •Calculate convergence rate (% change per session)
- •Identify stalled areas (no progress in 3+ sessions)
- •Compare current state to
convergence_targets
Evidence required: 5+ sessions of convergence data
5. Generate Findings
For each finding, determine the tier:
Tier 1 — Automatic Changes (max 3 per session)
Small, safe adjustments with clear evidence. Apply directly:
| Change Type | Limits | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Cadence adjustment | ±2 days | pessimistic-review: 7 → 5 days |
| Overdue threshold | ±2 days | validate-all overdue: 2 → 3 days |
| Replenishment weight | ±20% | chain source weight: 50 → 60 |
Before applying, verify:
- •Setting is not in
locked_settings - •Setting hasn't changed in last 60 days (check changelog)
- •Clear directional pattern (not random variation)
Tier 2 — Recommendations (log for human approval)
Medium-impact changes:
- •New task suggestions (add to todo.md as P3)
- •Cadence changes >2 days
- •Replenishment mode changes (conservative ↔ aggressive)
- •Convergence target adjustments
Tier 3 — Report Only (never automatic)
Changes requiring human judgment:
- •Skill instruction modifications
- •New skill creation
- •Tenet-related adjustments
- •Removing vetoed task constraints
- •Priority level promotions
6. Apply Tier 1 Changes
For each approved Tier 1 change:
- •Record the previous value
- •Apply the change to the appropriate file
- •Add a comment noting the change date and rationale
Example change to evolution-state.yaml:
cadences: pessimistic-review: 5 # Changed from 7 by tune-system 2026-01-08 (overdue 4/5 sessions)
7. Update Evolution State
Add/update these fields in evolution-state.yaml:
last_runs:
tune-system: [current ISO timestamp]
# Track what was changed for cooldown enforcement
tune_system_history:
last_run: [ISO timestamp]
changes_applied:
- setting: cadences.pessimistic-review
old_value: 7
new_value: 5
date: [ISO date]
rationale: "Overdue in 4 of 5 recent sessions"
8. Generate Report
Create report at obsidian/reviews/system-tune-YYYY-MM-DD.md:
--- title: "System Tuning Report - YYYY-MM-DD" created: YYYY-MM-DD modified: YYYY-MM-DD human_modified: null ai_modified: [ISO timestamp] draft: false topics: [] concepts: [] related_articles: - "[[todo]]" - "[[changelog]]" ai_contribution: 100 author: null ai_system: [current model] ai_generated_date: YYYY-MM-DD last_curated: null --- # System Tuning Report **Date**: YYYY-MM-DD **Sessions analyzed**: N (sessions X to Y) **Period covered**: [date range] ## Executive Summary [2-3 sentences on overall system health and key findings] ## Metrics Overview | Metric | Current | Previous | Trend | |--------|---------|----------|-------| | Session count | N | N-X | +X | | Avg tasks/session | X.X | X.X | ↑/↓/→ | | Failure rate | X% | X% | ↑/↓/→ | | Convergence | X% | X% | +X% | | Queue depth (P0-P2) | X | X | ↑/↓/→ | ## Findings ### Cadence Analysis [Findings with evidence and recommendations] ### Failure Pattern Analysis [Findings with evidence and recommendations] ### Queue Health Analysis [Findings with evidence and recommendations] ### Review Finding Patterns [Findings with evidence and recommendations] ### Convergence Progress [Findings with evidence and recommendations] ## Changes Applied (Tier 1) | File | Setting | Old | New | Rationale | |------|---------|-----|-----|-----------| | evolution-state.yaml | cadences.X | Y | Z | [reason] | *No changes applied* — if none were warranted ## Recommendations (Tier 2) ### [Recommendation Title] - **Proposed change**: [specific change] - **Rationale**: [why this helps] - **Risk**: Low/Medium - **To approve**: [how human can apply] ## Items for Human Review (Tier 3) ### [Item Title] - **Issue observed**: [description] - **Why human needed**: [explanation] - **Suggested action**: [what human might do] ## Next Tuning Session - **Recommended**: [date, 30 days out] - **Focus areas**: [what to watch]
9. Log to Changelog
Add entry to obsidian/workflow/changelog.md:
### HH:MM - tune-system - **Status**: Success/Partial/Failed - **Sessions analyzed**: N - **Findings**: X cadence, Y failure, Z queue, W review, V convergence - **Tier 1 changes**: N applied - **Tier 2 recommendations**: N logged - **Output**: `reviews/system-tune-YYYY-MM-DD.md`
Safeguards
Evidence Thresholds
| Analysis Type | Minimum Data Points |
|---|---|
| Cadence patterns | 5 sessions |
| Failure patterns | 3 occurrences |
| Queue patterns | 5 sessions |
| Review patterns | 3 reviews |
| Convergence trends | 5 sessions |
Change Cooldowns
After a Tier 1 change, that setting cannot be changed again for:
- •2 tune-system sessions, OR
- •60 days
Check tune_system_history.changes_applied before making any change.
Magnitude Limits
- •Cadence: ±2 days maximum
- •Threshold: ±2 days maximum
- •Weight: ±20 percentage points maximum
- •Maximum 3 Tier 1 changes per session
Locked Settings
Human can prevent automatic changes by adding to evolution-state.yaml:
locked_settings: cadences.check-tenets: "Locked 2026-01-10 - monthly cadence is intentional"
Important
DO NOT:
- •Modify skill instruction files (SKILL.md files)
- •Change priority levels (P0-P3) of existing tasks
- •Remove items from vetoed tasks
- •Modify anything related to tenets
- •Make changes without clear evidence (no speculative "improvements")
- •Exceed magnitude limits even if evidence seems strong
- •Change locked settings
- •Run more frequently than monthly (unless manually invoked)
DO:
- •Be conservative — when in doubt, recommend rather than apply
- •Document everything — all findings, all changes, all rationale
- •Respect cooldowns — no rapid oscillation of settings
- •Focus on operational parameters — cadences, thresholds, weights
- •Generate actionable recommendations for Tier 2/3 items