AgentSkillsCN

ralph

将 PRD 转换为 Ralph 自主代理系统的 prd.json 格式。当您已有现成的 PRD 并需将其转换为 Ralph 的 JSON 格式,或被要求创建 prd.json 时,可使用此技能。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: ralph
description: Convert PRDs to prd.json format for the Ralph autonomous agent system. Use when you have an existing PRD and need to convert it to Ralph's JSON format, or when asked to create prd.json.

Ralph PRD Converter

Converts existing PRDs to the prd.json format that Ralph uses for autonomous execution.

The Job

Take a PRD (markdown file or text) and convert it to prd.json in the Ralph project directory.

Usage: /ralph convert <prd-file> to <project-name>

Example: /ralph convert tasks/prd-task-status.md to task-status

This creates: .ralph/projects/task-status/prd.json

Output Location

All output goes to: .ralph/projects/<project-name>/

Before writing, ensure the directory exists:

bash
mkdir -p .ralph/projects/<project-name>

Write the prd.json to: .ralph/projects/<project-name>/prd.json

Output Format

json
{
  "project": "[Project Name]",
  "branchName": "ralph/[project-name]",
  "description": "[Feature description from PRD title/intro]",
  "userStories": [
    {
      "id": "US-001",
      "title": "[Story title]",
      "description": "As a [user], I want [feature] so that [benefit]",
      "acceptanceCriteria": [
        "Criterion 1",
        "Criterion 2",
        "Typecheck passes"
      ],
      "priority": 1,
      "status": "pending",
      "phases": {
        "investigate": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "implement": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "test": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "review": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "document": { "status": "pending", "output": null }
      },
      "passes": false,
      "notes": ""
    }
  ]
}

Status values: pending | in_progress | complete | blocked | failed | context_limit | manual_fix_needed

Story Size: The Number One Rule

Each story must be completable in ONE Ralph manager invocation.

Ralph uses a phased manager/subagent architecture. If a story is too big, the manager runs out of context before finishing all phases.

Right-sized stories:

  • Add a database column and migration
  • Add a UI component to an existing page
  • Update a server action with new logic
  • Add a filter dropdown to a list

Too big (split these):

  • "Build the entire dashboard" - Split into: schema, queries, UI components, filters
  • "Add authentication" - Split into: schema, middleware, login UI, session handling
  • "Refactor the API" - Split into one story per endpoint or pattern

Rule of thumb: If you cannot describe the change in 2-3 sentences, it is too big.

Story Ordering: Dependencies First

Stories execute in priority order. Earlier stories must not depend on later ones.

Correct order:

  1. Schema/database changes (migrations)
  2. Server actions / backend logic
  3. UI components that use the backend
  4. Dashboard/summary views that aggregate data

Wrong order:

  1. UI component (depends on schema that does not exist yet)
  2. Schema change

Acceptance Criteria: Must Be Verifiable

Each criterion must be something Ralph can CHECK, not something vague.

Good criteria (verifiable):

  • "Add status column to tasks table with default 'pending'"
  • "Filter dropdown has options: All, Active, Completed"
  • "Clicking delete shows confirmation dialog"
  • "Typecheck passes"
  • "Tests pass"

Bad criteria (vague):

  • "Works correctly"
  • "User can do X easily"
  • "Good UX"
  • "Handles edge cases"

Always include as final criterion:

code
"Typecheck passes"

For stories with testable logic, also include:

code
"Tests pass"

For stories that change UI, also include:

code
"Verify in browser"

Frontend stories are NOT complete until visually verified.

Conversion Rules

  1. Each user story becomes one JSON entry
  2. IDs: Sequential (US-001, US-002, etc.)
  3. Priority: Based on dependency order, then document order
  4. All stories: status: "pending", passes: false, empty notes
  5. All phases: Initialize with status: "pending" and output: null
  6. branchName: Use the project name, prefixed with ralph/
  7. Always add: "Typecheck passes" to every story's acceptance criteria

Splitting Large PRDs

If a PRD has big features, split them:

Original:

"Add user notification system"

Split into:

  1. US-001: Add notifications table to database
  2. US-002: Create notification service for sending notifications
  3. US-003: Add notification bell icon to header
  4. US-004: Create notification dropdown panel
  5. US-005: Add mark-as-read functionality
  6. US-006: Add notification preferences page

Each is one focused change that can be completed and verified independently.

Example

Command: /ralph convert tasks/prd-task-status.md to task-status

Input PRD (tasks/prd-task-status.md):

markdown
# Task Status Feature

Add ability to mark tasks with different statuses.

## Requirements
- Toggle between pending/in-progress/done on task list
- Filter list by status
- Show status badge on each task
- Persist status in database

Output (.ralph/projects/task-status/prd.json):

json
{
  "project": "Task Status",
  "branchName": "ralph/task-status",
  "description": "Task Status Feature - Track task progress with status indicators",
  "userStories": [
    {
      "id": "US-001",
      "title": "Add status field to tasks table",
      "description": "As a developer, I need to store task status in the database.",
      "acceptanceCriteria": [
        "Add status column: 'pending' | 'in_progress' | 'done' (default 'pending')",
        "Generate and run migration successfully",
        "Typecheck passes"
      ],
      "priority": 1,
      "status": "pending",
      "phases": {
        "investigate": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "implement": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "test": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "review": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "document": { "status": "pending", "output": null }
      },
      "passes": false,
      "notes": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "US-002",
      "title": "Display status badge on task cards",
      "description": "As a user, I want to see task status at a glance.",
      "acceptanceCriteria": [
        "Each task card shows colored status badge",
        "Badge colors: gray=pending, blue=in_progress, green=done",
        "Typecheck passes",
        "Verify in browser"
      ],
      "priority": 2,
      "status": "pending",
      "phases": {
        "investigate": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "implement": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "test": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "review": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "document": { "status": "pending", "output": null }
      },
      "passes": false,
      "notes": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "US-003",
      "title": "Add status toggle to task list rows",
      "description": "As a user, I want to change task status directly from the list.",
      "acceptanceCriteria": [
        "Each row has status dropdown or toggle",
        "Changing status saves immediately",
        "UI updates without page refresh",
        "Typecheck passes",
        "Verify in browser"
      ],
      "priority": 3,
      "status": "pending",
      "phases": {
        "investigate": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "implement": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "test": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "review": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "document": { "status": "pending", "output": null }
      },
      "passes": false,
      "notes": ""
    },
    {
      "id": "US-004",
      "title": "Filter tasks by status",
      "description": "As a user, I want to filter the list to see only certain statuses.",
      "acceptanceCriteria": [
        "Filter dropdown: All | Pending | In Progress | Done",
        "Filter persists in URL params",
        "Typecheck passes",
        "Verify in browser"
      ],
      "priority": 4,
      "status": "pending",
      "phases": {
        "investigate": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "implement": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "test": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "review": { "status": "pending", "output": null },
        "document": { "status": "pending", "output": null }
      },
      "passes": false,
      "notes": ""
    }
  ]
}

After Creating prd.json

Tell the user:

code
Created: .ralph/projects/<project-name>/prd.json

To run Ralph:
  .ralph/ralph.sh <project-name>

Checklist Before Saving

Before writing prd.json, verify:

  • Project directory created: .ralph/projects/<project-name>/
  • Each story is completable in one manager invocation (small enough)
  • Stories are ordered by dependency (schema to backend to UI)
  • Every story has "Typecheck passes" as criterion
  • UI stories have "Verify in browser" as criterion
  • Acceptance criteria are verifiable (not vague)
  • No story depends on a later story
  • All stories have phases initialized with pending status
  • branchName matches the project name with ralph/ prefix