Team Summary (Manager Mode)
Generate team-level overview aggregating work across all direct reports, useful for leadership updates, calibration meetings, and team retrospectives.
Manager Mode Only
This skill requires manager mode. Verify with: work-chronicler workspace profile
If not in manager mode, run work-chronicler init --mode manager first.
Workspace
Active profile: !work-chronicler workspace profile
Manager root: !work-chronicler workspace root
For non-Claude tools: Run
work-chronicler workspace rootto get your manager profile path.
User Input
Optional:
- •Time period: The period to summarize (e.g., "Q1-2026", "2025", "last-6-months")
- •If omitted, summarizes all available data
- •Focus areas: Specific projects, themes, or initiatives to emphasize
Example invocations:
- •
/work-chronicler-mgmt-team-summary Q1-2026 - •
/work-chronicler-mgmt-team-summary 2025 - •
/work-chronicler-mgmt-team-summary(all time) - •
/work-chronicler-mgmt-team-summary last-6-months focus on platform initiatives
Data Location
Manager mode team-level data:
<manager-root>/
├── analysis/ # Team-level aggregations
│ ├── team-projects.json # All projects across team
│ ├── contributor-matrix.json # Who worked on which projects
│ └── team-timeline.json # Team activity rollup
└── reports/
└── <report-id>/
└── analysis/
├── stats.json # Individual stats (for aggregation)
├── projects.json # Individual projects
└── timeline.json # Individual timeline
Instructions
- •
Read team-level analysis:
- •
team-projects.json- All projects across the team - •
contributor-matrix.json- Collaboration patterns (who worked with whom) - •
team-timeline.json- Team-wide activity trends
- •
- •
Aggregate individual stats (if needed for additional context):
- •Read each report's
analysis/stats.json - •Aggregate impact distribution (flagship, major, standard counts)
- •Calculate team-wide totals (PRs, tickets, repos touched)
- •Read each report's
- •
Filter by time period (if specified):
- •Parse time period (e.g., "Q1-2026" → Jan 1 - Mar 31, 2026)
- •Filter projects and timeline data to that range
- •Focus only on work within the specified period
- •
Identify patterns:
- •Cross-team collaboration (projects with multiple contributors)
- •Key initiatives and their contributors
- •Activity trends (busiest periods, focus shifts)
- •Impact distribution across the team
- •
Focus on team dynamics:
- •How the team works together
- •Major initiatives and their outcomes
- •Areas of focus and expertise
- •Collaboration effectiveness
Output Location
Save generated documents to:
<manager-root>/outputs/team-summary-YYYY-MM-DD.md
Or if time period specified:
<manager-root>/outputs/team-summary-Q1-2026.md
Output Format
## Team Summary: [Team Name or Org] - [Period] ### Team Overview - **Team size**: [number] direct reports - **Period**: [date range or "all time"] - **Repositories**: [count] across [org] ### Key Projects & Initiatives #### [Project Name] - **Description**: [What was built/accomplished] - **Contributors**: [List names, not as comparison but as collaboration] - **Impact**: [Business value or outcome] - **Status**: [Completed/In Progress/etc.] #### [Project Name] - **Description**: [What was built/accomplished] - **Contributors**: [List names] - **Impact**: [Business value or outcome] - **Status**: [Completed/In Progress/etc.] ### Collaboration Patterns - [Cross-team initiatives that involved multiple reports working together] - [Knowledge sharing or mentorship patterns observed] - [Areas where collaboration was particularly effective] ### Activity Trends - **Total PRs**: [count] - **Total Tickets**: [count] - **Impact distribution**: [flagship: X, major: Y, standard: Z] - **Busiest periods**: [from timeline data] - **Primary focus areas**: [themes or domains] ### Team Strengths [What the team does particularly well, based on the work patterns] ### Areas of Focus [Current or recent areas where the team is concentrating effort] ### Notable Wins [Significant achievements worth calling out for leadership visibility]
Use Cases
This skill is optimized for:
- •Leadership skip-levels: Provide visibility to senior leadership
- •Calibration meetings: Context for discussing the team as a whole
- •Quarterly retrospectives: Reflect on team accomplishments
- •Resource planning: Understand team capacity and focus areas
- •Team health checks: Identify collaboration patterns and engagement
Critical Constraints
Per roadmap requirements - THESE ARE MANDATORY:
- •✅ Team-level patterns and trends
- •✅ Collaboration effectiveness
- •✅ Aggregate impact distribution
- •✅ Project-oriented narratives
- •❌ NO individual rankings
- •❌ NO individual scoring
- •❌ NO individual comparisons
- •❌ NO "top performer" or similar language
This is a TEAM summary, not a leaderboard. Focus on how the team works together and what the team accomplished.
Important Notes
Listing Contributors
When listing who worked on a project:
- •Do: "Contributors: Alice, Bob, Charlie worked together on this initiative"
- •Do: "This was a cross-team effort with Alice leading frontend and Bob handling backend"
- •Don't: "Alice contributed the most" or "Bob's work was critical while others supported"
- •Don't: Any language that implies ranking or comparison
Aggregate Stats
When showing aggregate numbers:
- •Do: "The team merged 150 PRs this quarter, with 20 flagship-level initiatives"
- •Do: "Impact distribution: 20 flagship, 45 major, 85 standard"
- •Don't: "Alice had the most PRs" or "Bob had the highest impact ratio"
- •Don't: Individual breakdowns unless specifically showing collaboration patterns
Collaboration Language
Focus on:
- •Projects that brought people together
- •Knowledge sharing across the team
- •How different expertise combined for outcomes
- •Cross-functional work patterns
Tips
- •Use project names and initiatives as organizing principles
- •Highlight team accomplishments, not individual stars
- •Perfect for showing leadership what the team is accomplishing
- •Can identify gaps or opportunities for the team as a whole
- •Useful for understanding team capacity and velocity trends
- •Great for quarterly team retros to celebrate collective wins