Agent Context Generator
What You'll Do
- •🔍 Inventory the repository's structure, capture a
.gitignore-awaretreeoutput, and record automation entry points (preferringjust/maketasks when available) - •🧭 Capture coding conventions, directory ownership, testing expectations, and review workflows so future agents can navigate confidently
- •🧩 Produce an
AGENTS.mdfile following the opinionated section order below, honoring scope rules for nested directories - •✅ Embed universal wrap-up tasks: ensure the README is updated after significant code changes and summarize changes per conventional commits while resolving any open questions with the developer
Phase 1 · Understand the Repository
- •Check for existing AGENTS.md
- •Use
findalternative (globor repo tree) to discover current files. Determine scope inheritance so you can update or extend instead of duplicating.
- •Use
- •Read Core Docs
- •Skim
README.md,CONTRIBUTING.md, and other onboarding docs for project philosophy, setup, and workflows. - •If
docs/ordocumentation/exists, scan for architectural or process references worth surfacing.
- •Skim
- •Survey Project Layout
- •Note primary directories, languages, build targets, and ownership (e.g., "
src/uimaintained by Frontend team"). - •Check for
plans/,docs/, or other knowledge directories. Flag must-read files (ADR indexes, architecture overviews, runbooks) to reference later in AGENTS.md.
- •Note primary directories, languages, build targets, and ownership (e.g., "
- •Build a Git-aware Tree
- •Use the
treecommand with the--gitignoreflag (tree ≥ 2.0) so ignored paths stay hidden:tree --gitignore -a -L 3 > tmp/tree.txt. - •If your
treebuild lacks--gitignore, runtree -a -L 3 --pruneand manually prune any ignored directories noted in.gitignore, or install an updated version via your package manager. - •Capture or trim the output before placing it in AGENTS.md (focus on the top 2–3 levels, and note when you omitted details for brevity).
- •Use the
- •Identify Automation Runners
- •If
Justfileexists, runjust --list(orjust --list --unsortedfor extra notes). - •If
Makefileexists (andjustdoes not), runmake helpor inspect phony targets for canonical tasks. - •Record which commands are recommended for linting, testing, building, syncing data, etc. Link the definitive task names you surface in your notes for inclusion later.
- •If
- •Catalog Tooling & Environment
- •List required runtimes, package managers, env vars, secrets handling, and local services.
- •Note down any
.env.example,config/, or secrets documentation that agents must review.
- •Clarify Testing & Quality Gates
- •Identify test suites, coverage expectations, linting, formatting, and CI workflows.
- •Resolve Ambiguities Early
- •Whenever conventions, ownership, or workflows seem unclear, prompt the developer with focused questions before drafting the guide.
- •Ask explicitly whether existing
plans/or documentation directories are authoritative or stale, and clarify what canon to reference.
Outcome: A structured notes list describing layout, tooling, commands, testing, release process, documentation references, pending questions, and update expectations.
Phase 2 · Plan the AGENTS.md Structure
Follow this opinionated order to keep files consistent and scannable:
- •Header — Title + short purpose statement.
- •Quick Facts — Table or bullet summary (languages, package manager, key scripts, CI).
- •Repository Tour — High-level directory map with responsibilities and ownership hints.
- •Tooling & Setup — Required runtimes, package managers, environment variables, secrets.
- •Common Tasks — Lint/test/build/deploy commands. Prefer listing
justrecipes first, thenmaketargets, then raw commands. - •Testing & Quality — When and how to run tests, linting, formatting, coverage, and CI expectations.
- •Workflow Expectations — Branching model, review norms, feature flagging, deployment cadence.
- •Documentation Duties — When to update
README.md, architecture diagrams, or other docs. - •Finish the Task — Mandatory wrap-up checklist for every agent task.
For deeper directories (e.g., services/api/), include a "Scope" note at the top clarifying inheritance from parent AGENTS instructions. Always confirm with the developer before drafting new per-directory AGENTS files so you do not duplicate existing guidance or create unnecessary overhead.
Phase 3 · Compose AGENTS.md
Use the template below and adapt each section to the project:
# Project Agent Guide > Scope: Root project (applies to all subdirectories unless overridden) ## Quick Facts - **Primary language:** - **Package manager:** - **Entrypoints:** - **CI/CD:** ## Repository Tour - `path/` — description & owner ## Tooling & Setup - Install instructions (per OS) - Required environment variables (with purpose) - Secrets management notes ## Common Tasks - `just <task>` — what it does (preferred) - `make <target>` — what it does - Raw command fallback when automation missing ## Testing & Quality Gates - Unit/integration test commands - Lint/format commands - Coverage expectations & thresholds - CI status command or dashboard link ## Workflow Expectations - Branch naming and review rules - Feature toggles or release cadence - Any approval or ticket linkage requirements ## Documentation Duties - Update `README.md` when features, setup steps, or developer ergonomics change materially - List other docs to refresh (architecture, ADRs, etc.) ## Finish the Task Checklist - [ ] Update relevant docs (& `README.md` if significant changes landed) - [ ] Summarize changes in conventional commit format (e.g., `feat: ...`, `fix: ...`)
Subdirectory Template (Use Only with Developer Approval)
# <Directory Name> Agent Guide > Scope: ./path/to/directory (inherits root AGENTS.md unless noted) ## Purpose - What lives here - Who owns it (team/contact) ## Key Files - `file_or_folder/` — why it matters ## Common Tasks - `just <task>` / `make <target>` / command snippets scoped to this directory ## Testing & Quality - Specific tests, linters, or data fixtures for this directory ## Hand-off Notes - Docs or runbooks to reference - Open questions captured during discovery
Only create these per-directory guides after confirming with the developer which areas need dedicated context and what information should be emphasized.
Writing Notes:
- •Keep language direct and actionable. Agents should follow commands verbatim.
- •Mention the preferred order of operations (e.g., "Always run
just formatbefore opening a PR"). - •When referencing scripts, include relative paths so agents can jump quickly (e.g.,
scripts/bootstrap.sh). - •Incorporate a trimmed
tree --gitignoresnapshot (or link to the saved artifact) so readers grasp layout quickly. - •In the Repository Tour, highlight where
plans/,docs/, design docs, or ADRs live if present. - •Call out any unanswered questions as action items, and confirm with the developer before creating any per-directory AGENTS overlays.
- •If the project mixes languages/platforms, add subsections per component but keep global guidance first.
Phase 4 · Validate & Wrap Up
- •Self-review
- •Does the file respect AGENTS scope rules? (Mention inheritance or overrides.)
- •Are all critical commands documented, especially automation entry points?
- •Is the README update expectation explicit?
- •Did you obtain developer approval before adding any per-directory AGENTS files, and is that approval reflected in the write-up?
- •Does the "Finish the Task" checklist include the conventional commit summary reminder?
- •Formatting
- •Ensure headings use Title Case, commands are wrapped in backticks, and lists are concise.
- •Keep sections under ~8 bullets unless a table is clearer.
- •Handoff Summary
- •When delivering the AGENTS.md to the user, include:
- •A short summary of major sections added/updated.
- •Confirmation that README and conventional commit reminders are present.
- •Any follow-up suggestions (e.g., missing tests or outdated scripts).
- •When delivering the AGENTS.md to the user, include:
Use this skill whenever a repo lacks AGENTS context or when existing instructions are incomplete or outdated. The goal is to leave future agents with a single, trustworthy map of the project, its tooling, and the expectations for finishing tasks responsibly.