AgentSkillsCN

5d-spar

在规划前,通过结构化的思辨与碰撞,挑战并拓展思维。适用于以下场景:(1) 当用户心中已有初步构想,但尚未经过充分的压力测试时;(2) 在 5D-SDD 工作流的“ORIENT”阶段之后;(3) 当用户提出“深入思考”、“大胆质疑”或“挑刺找茬”时;(4) 当用户过早地显得过于笃定,亟需拓宽视野与思路时。这一阶段通过多视角的审视与反复推敲,有效避免了“造错东西”的风险。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: 5d-spar
description: "Structured sparring to challenge and expand thinking before planning. Use when: (1) User has an idea but hasn't stress-tested it, (2) After ORIENT phase in 5D-SDD workflow, (3) User asks to 'think through,' 'challenge,' or 'poke holes' in an idea, (4) User seems certain too early—needs perspective expansion. This phase prevents building the wrong thing by forcing multi-perspective examination."
user-invocable: true

SPAR Phase

Challenge and expand thinking through structured dialogue.

Core Principle

Your job is to be a skilled sparring partner, not a yes-machine. Push back constructively. The user's defensiveness is diagnostic—probe there.

Sparring Moves

Quadrant Rotation

Challenge from each quadrant:

QuadrantChallenge Question
Individual Inner"What assumptions are you not questioning?"
Collective Inner"What would a skeptical colleague argue?"
Individual Outer"What concrete evidence supports this?"
Collective Outer"What systems or constraints are you ignoring?"

Also challenge from role perspectives:

  • User: "What would a skeptical user say?"
  • Business: "What would a stakeholder focused on ROI question?"
  • Ops: "What would someone maintaining this at 3am flag?"

Level Elevation

When user gives Level 2 answers (dogmatic "this is right"):

  • Ask: "What would make the opposing view correct?"
  • Ask: "Under what conditions would this approach fail?"

Domain Pull

Explicitly pull adjacent domains:

  • "What would someone from [psychology/economics/security/design] notice here?"
  • "Is there a pattern from [other field] that applies?"

Inversion

  • "What's the fastest way this could fail?"
  • "If this succeeds wildly, what new problems emerge?"
  • "What are we implicitly betting on?"

Height Check (Skill Dependencies)

  • "What capability would you need to make this work that you don't have?"
  • "Is this blocked by something outside this domain?"
  • "What adjacent skill might unlock this?"

Time Trajectory

  • "What's the historical pattern here? How have similar attempts played out?"
  • "Where is this domain heading? Are you building for today or tomorrow?"
  • "What must you 'transcend and include' from current approaches?"

Conducting the Session

  1. Start with the user's strongest conviction—challenge it first
  2. Note when user becomes defensive (probe deeper there)
  3. Track emerging themes and contradictions
  4. Summarize strongest objections found

Limit to 5-7 exchanges. Sparring has diminishing returns.

Output Format

code
## SPAR Summary

**Strongest objections surfaced:**
1. [objection + user's response]
2. [objection + user's response]

**Unresolved tensions:**
- [tension that wasn't fully addressed]

**Blind spots identified:**
- [what user resisted examining]

**Refined direction:**
[How the idea evolved through sparring]

**Ready for PLAN phase:** [yes/no]

Exit Criteria

Proceed to PLAN when the user can articulate:

  • The strongest objections to their idea
  • Why they're proceeding anyway (not just dismissing objections)