AgentSkillsCN

5d-plan

将发散性思维转化为具体且多视角的实施方案。适用于以下场景:(1) 在 5D-SDD 工作流的“SPAR”阶段之后;(2) 当用户已准备好明确将要构建的内容时;(3) 当用户提出“把方案写下来”或“记录下我们正在构建的东西”时;(4) 在从探索阶段迈向承诺阶段时。这一阶段能够在技术规格制定之前,形成权威而清晰的意图描述。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: 5d-plan
description: "Convert expanded thinking into a concrete, multi-perspective plan. Use when: (1) After SPAR phase in 5D-SDD workflow, (2) User is ready to define what will be built, (3) User asks to 'write up the plan' or 'document what we're building,' (4) Transitioning from exploration to commitment. This phase creates the authoritative description of intent before technical specification."
user-invocable: true

PLAN Phase

Crystallize sparring outcomes into a concrete plan.

Plan Structure

1. Problem Statement

One paragraph. What problem does this solve? For whom? Why now?

Avoid: Solution-focused framing. This section is about the problem, not the answer.

2. Proposed Solution

Describe what will exist that doesn't exist now. Use plain language—no technical jargon yet.

Include:

  • Core functionality (what it does)
  • Key behaviors (how it works from user perspective)
  • Boundaries (what it explicitly won't do)

3. Assumptions & Bets

Make implicit assumptions explicit:

code
We assume:
- [assumption about users]
- [assumption about technical feasibility]
- [assumption about business value]

We are betting that:
- [bet 1 - what we're gambling on]
- [bet 2]

Identity attachment risk:
- [what we might be defending rather than evaluating]

4. Thinking Level Declaration (Depth)

Acknowledge current thinking level:

  • Are we at Level 2 (dogmatic—"this is the right way")?
  • Can we articulate why alternative approaches might be valid (Level 3)?
  • What novel insight does this plan contain (Level 4)?

5. Skill Dependencies (Height)

Document what capabilities the plan requires:

  • What skills must the team have or acquire?
  • What domain knowledge unlocks implementation?
  • What's blocking progress that's outside this plan's scope?

6. Alternatives Considered

Document what was rejected and why:

AlternativeWhy Rejected
[option A][reason]
[option B][reason]

This prevents re-litigating decisions later.

7. Quadrant Coverage

Ensure plan addresses all four:

QuadrantPlan Element
Individual OuterWhat artifacts will be created
Individual InnerWhat understanding/skills are required
Collective OuterHow this fits existing systems
Collective InnerWhat alignment is needed across stakeholders

8. Time Horizons

  • V1 (this iteration): [scope]
  • V2 (next iteration): [deferred scope]
  • Explicitly not planned: [out of scope]

Output Format

Produce a standalone document titled PLAN.md with the sections above.

Keep it under 500 words. Plans that require more are actually multiple plans.

Exit Criteria

Proceed to REFINE when:

  • All sections are complete
  • User confirms plan matches their intent
  • No major gaps in quadrant coverage