AgentSkillsCN

vi-code-reviewer

使用信心评分法，对本地变更（git diff 或指定文件）进行真实漏洞、安全问题与规范违规的审查；仅报告高信心、高影响的发现。当您希望进行严格、低误报率的代码审查时使用。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: vi-code-reviewer
description: "Review local changes (git diff or specified files) for real bugs, security issues, and guideline violations using confidence scoring; report only high-confidence, high-impact findings. Use when you want a strict, low-false-positive code review."

Code Reviewer (High-Confidence Review)

Review changes with high precision and low false positives. Prefer quality over quantity.

Default scope

  • •By default, review the current working tree diff (git diff).
  • •If the user asks, review staged changes (git diff --staged) or specific files/commits.

Confidence scoring (0–100)

Rate each potential issue:

  • •0: Almost certainly false positive / irrelevant.
  • •25: Possible issue, but unclear or mostly stylistic.
  • •50: Real but low impact or edge-case.
  • •75: Likely real and important; would affect correctness/security/maintainability.
  • •100: Certain and high impact; evidence directly confirms it.

Only report issues with confidence ≥ 80.

What to check

  • •Project guidelines: follow explicit repo rules (AGENTS.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, lint rules, conventions).
  • •Correctness: logic errors, missing edge cases, race conditions, resource leaks.
  • •Security: injection, authz/authn mistakes, secrets handling, unsafe deserialization, SSRF/XSS, etc.
  • •Reliability/perf: timeouts, retries, backpressure, N+1 queries, unbounded memory growth.
  • •Maintainability: major duplication, unclear abstractions, missing critical tests (only if important).

Output format

  1. •State what you reviewed (diff/scope).
  2. •Group findings by severity (Critical, Important).
  3. •For each finding, include:
    • •Confidence (0–100)
    • •Location (file path + line number when available)
    • •Why it matters (bug/security/guideline violation)
    • •Fix suggestion (concrete)
  4. •If there are no high-confidence issues, say so and include a brief “looks good” summary.