Intent
Create a structured representation of the current state of a domain, system, or entity. This is the foundation for world modeling, enabling tracking of entities, relationships, and properties over time.
Success criteria:
- •State captured in structured, queryable format
- •Entities and relationships clearly identified
- •Uncertainty and confidence explicitly represented
- •Evidence anchors for all state assertions
Compatible schemas:
- •
schemas/output_schema.yaml - •
reference/world_state_schema.yaml
Inputs
| Parameter | Required | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
scope | Yes | string | What domain/system to model (e.g., "user authentication", "payment processing") |
schema | No | object | State schema defining expected structure |
timestamp | No | string | Point in time for state (default: now) |
depth | No | string | Modeling depth: surface, detailed, comprehensive |
Procedure
- •
Define scope boundaries: Clarify what is included in the state model
- •Identify system or domain boundaries
- •Determine entity types to include
- •Establish relationship types to capture
- •
Identify entities: Enumerate entities within scope
- •Extract entity references from sources
- •Assign unique identifiers
- •Capture entity properties/attributes
- •
Map relationships: Document connections between entities
- •Identify relationship types (contains, depends_on, references)
- •Note relationship directionality
- •Capture relationship properties
- •
Capture current values: Record current state of each entity
- •Document property values with evidence
- •Note uncertainty where values are unclear
- •Record observation timestamp
- •
Apply schema: Structure state according to schema if provided
- •Validate against schema constraints
- •Note schema violations or extensions needed
- •Ensure required fields are populated
- •
Ground state claims: Attach evidence to all assertions
- •Reference source files, commands, or observations
- •Note confidence level for each assertion
Output Contract
Return a structured object:
state:
world_id: string # Unique identifier for this state snapshot
scope: string # Domain being modeled
timestamp: string # When state was captured
entities:
- id: string # Unique entity identifier
type: string # Entity classification
properties: object # Entity attributes
confidence: number # Confidence in entity state
relationships:
- from: string # Source entity ID
to: string # Target entity ID
type: string # Relationship type
properties: object # Relationship attributes
meta:
version: string # State schema version
completeness: number # 0-1 estimate of coverage
confidence: 0..1 # Overall state model confidence
evidence_anchors: ["file:line", "observation:id"]
assumptions: []
Field Definitions
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
state.world_id | string | Unique identifier for state snapshot |
state.scope | string | Domain or system being modeled |
state.entities | array | Identified entities with properties |
state.relationships | array | Connections between entities |
state.meta.completeness | number | Estimated model completeness |
confidence | number | Overall confidence in state accuracy |
Examples
Example 1: Model Authentication System State
Input:
scope: "user authentication system" depth: "detailed"
Output:
state:
world_id: "auth-state-20240115-001"
scope: "user authentication system"
timestamp: "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z"
entities:
- id: "auth-service"
type: "service"
properties:
status: "running"
version: "2.3.1"
port: 8080
confidence: 0.95
- id: "user-db"
type: "database"
properties:
type: "PostgreSQL"
connection_pool: 20
active_connections: 12
confidence: 0.90
- id: "session-cache"
type: "cache"
properties:
type: "Redis"
memory_used: "256MB"
keys: 15420
confidence: 0.90
relationships:
- from: "auth-service"
to: "user-db"
type: "depends_on"
properties:
connection_type: "direct"
required: true
- from: "auth-service"
to: "session-cache"
type: "depends_on"
properties:
connection_type: "direct"
required: true
meta:
version: "1.0"
completeness: 0.85
confidence: 0.88
evidence_anchors:
- "config/services.yml:15-45"
- "command:docker ps"
- "command:redis-cli info"
assumptions:
- "Service discovery reflects actual running state"
- "Configuration matches deployed state"
Example 2: Model Code Module State
Input:
scope: "payment processing module" schema: required_entities: ["class", "method", "dependency"]
Output:
state:
world_id: "payments-code-20240115"
scope: "payment processing module"
timestamp: "2024-01-15T11:00:00Z"
entities:
- id: "PaymentProcessor"
type: "class"
properties:
file: "src/services/payment_processor.rb"
lines: 145
methods: 8
complexity: 24
confidence: 0.95
- id: "process_payment"
type: "method"
properties:
class: "PaymentProcessor"
visibility: "public"
params: ["order", "payment_method"]
complexity: 12
confidence: 0.95
- id: "stripe-gem"
type: "dependency"
properties:
name: "stripe"
version: "8.0.0"
usage: ["PaymentProcessor"]
confidence: 0.90
relationships:
- from: "PaymentProcessor"
to: "stripe-gem"
type: "depends_on"
properties:
import_type: "require"
- from: "process_payment"
to: "PaymentProcessor"
type: "member_of"
properties:
visibility: "public"
meta:
version: "1.0"
completeness: 0.75
confidence: 0.85
evidence_anchors:
- "src/services/payment_processor.rb:1-145"
- "Gemfile:42"
assumptions:
- "Static analysis reflects runtime behavior"
- "No dynamic method definitions"
Verification
- • State includes world_id and timestamp
- • All entities have unique IDs and types
- • Relationships reference valid entity IDs
- • Confidence scores present for entities
- • Evidence anchors support state assertions
Verification tools: Read (to verify file references)
Safety Constraints
- •
mutation: false - •
requires_checkpoint: false - •
requires_approval: false - •
risk: low
Capability-specific rules:
- •Do not modify state while modeling it
- •Note when state may be stale or dynamic
- •Flag entities with low confidence
- •Do not invent entities without evidence
Composition Patterns
Commonly follows:
- •
observe- Observations feed into state modeling - •
retrieve- Retrieved data informs state - •
integrate- Merged data forms state
Commonly precedes:
- •
transition- State enables transition modeling - •
compare- States can be compared (diff) - •
simulate- State is starting point for simulation
Anti-patterns:
- •Never use state for predictions (use
predict) - •Avoid state for single-value measurement (use
measure)
Workflow references:
- •See
reference/workflow_catalog.yaml#world_model_buildfor state in world modeling - •See
reference/workflow_catalog.yaml#digital_twin_sync_loopfor state in digital twins