Contract Analyzer Skill
Purpose
Reusable analytical capability for systematically analyzing contract formation, validity, performance obligations, and potential issues under Indian Contract Act 1872 and related statutes.
When to Use
- •User asks about contract validity
- •Need to check if agreement is enforceable
- •Analyzing contract terms and obligations
- •Identifying defects in formation
- •Assessing compliance with statutory requirements
Knowledge Base
Protocols:
- •IL-CONTRACT-FORMATION
- •IL-CONTRACT-CAPACITY
- •IL-CONTRACT-FREE-CONSENT
- •IL-CONTRACT-LEGALITY
- •IL-CONTRACT-VOID-VOIDABLE
- •IL-CONTRACT-PERFORMANCE
Analytical Framework
Phase 1: Contract Identification
Input Required:
- •Contract text or description
- •Parties (names, type - individual/company, age if relevant)
- •Subject matter (goods, services, property)
- •Consideration (amount, terms)
- •Date of formation
- •Oral or written
Output: Contract classification (type, special contract category)
Phase 2: Validity Analysis (Section 10 Elements)
Systematic Check:
Element 1: Offer and Acceptance (Sections 2(a), 2(b))
- •Offer exists: Clear proposal to do/abstain from doing something?
- •Acceptance: Unconditional assent communicated to proposer?
- •Consensus ad idem: Meeting of minds?
- •Communication: Properly communicated (Section 4 postal rule if applicable)?
Defects:
- •No valid offer (invitation to treat mistaken for offer)
- •Conditional acceptance (counter-offer - Section 7)
- •Acceptance not communicated
- •Cross-offers (no contract)
Element 2: Consideration (Sections 2(d), 25)
- •Present: Something given at time of contract?
- •Past: Something already done (valid if at promisor's desire)?
- •Future: Promise to do something?
- •From promisee or third party: Can move from any person (Chinnaya v. Ramaya)?
- •Real but need not be adequate: Some value, but adequacy not relevant?
Section 25 Exceptions (no consideration required):
- •Love and affection (written, registered, near relation)
- •Past voluntary services (written, signed)
- •Time-barred debt promise (written, signed)
Defects:
- •No consideration (unless Section 25 exception)
- •Illusory consideration
- •Past consideration (not at promisor's desire)
Element 3: Capacity (Sections 10-12)
- •Age of majority: Not minor (under 18)?
- •Sound mind: Capable of understanding + forming rational judgment?
- •Not disqualified: Not alien enemy, undischarged insolvent, convict during sentence?
Mohori Bibee Principle: Minor's agreement VOID ab initio (not voidable)
Defects:
- •Minor party (VOID)
- •Unsound mind (lack capacity at contract time)
- •Disqualified person
Element 4: Free Consent (Sections 13-22)
Section 14: Consent free when not caused by:
A. Coercion (Section 15):
- •Committing/threatening IPC offense?
- •Unlawful detention/threat of detention of property?
B. Undue Influence (Section 16):
- •Dominant position exists (authority, fiduciary, mental weakness)?
- •Position used to obtain unfair advantage?
- •Section 16(3) presumption if dominant + unconscionable?
C. Fraud (Section 17):
- •False suggestion (believed true by speaker)?
- •Active concealment of material fact?
- •Promise without intention to perform?
- •Act fitted to deceive?
- •Act declared fraudulent by law?
D. Misrepresentation (Section 18):
- •Innocent false statement (speaker believes true)?
- •Breach of duty causing other party error?
- •Party causing consent has no knowledge/belief in truth?
E. Mistake (Section 20-22):
- •Bilateral mistake of fact (essential to agreement) → VOID
- •Unilateral mistake: Generally valid (except identity, non est factum)
- •Mistake of law: Valid (Section 21)
Defects:
- •Vitiated consent (coercion, fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence) → Voidable (Section 19)
- •Mutual mistake of fact → Void (Section 20)
Element 5: Lawful Object and Consideration (Section 23)
Void if:
- •Forbidden by law
- •Defeats provisions of law
- •Fraudulent
- •Involves injury to person/property
- •Immoral
- •Opposed to public policy
Section 27: Restraint of trade void (exception: sale of goodwill - reasonable restraint) Section 28: Restraint of legal proceedings void (exception: arbitration valid) Section 30: Wagering agreements void
Defects:
- •Unlawful object/consideration → Void
- •Restraint of trade (Section 27) → Void
- •Wagering (Section 30) → Void
Element 6: Not Expressly Void (Sections 26-30)
- •Section 26: Restraint of marriage → Void
- •Section 27: Restraint of trade → Void (with exceptions)
- •Section 28: Restraint of legal proceedings → Void (except arbitration)
- •Section 29: Uncertainty/wagering → Void
- •Section 30: Wagering agreements → Void
Defects: Falls under Sections 26-30 → Void
Element 7: Certainty (Section 29)
- •Terms definite and ascertainable?
- •No vagueness or ambiguity?
- •Performance possible to determine?
Defects: Vague/uncertain terms → Void (Section 29)
Element 8: Possibility of Performance (Section 56)
- •Performance possible (not impossible by nature)?
- •Not forbidden by law?
Defects: Impossible act → Void (Section 56)
Phase 3: Classification Determination
Decision Tree:
- •
All Section 10 elements satisfied → VALID (enforceable)
- •
Element defect - vitiated consent (coercion, fraud, misrepresentation, undue influence) → VOIDABLE at option of aggrieved party (Section 19, 19A)
- •
Element defect - capacity (minor) → VOID AB INITIO (Mohori Bibee)
- •
Element defect - unlawful object, restraint, uncertainty, impossibility → VOID (no effect)
Phase 4: Consequences and Remedies
If VALID:
- •Enforceable by both parties
- •Performance required per terms
- •Breach remedies available (damages, specific performance, injunction, rescission)
If VOIDABLE:
- •Aggrieved party options:
- •Rescind (Section 64): Cancel + restore status quo
- •Affirm: Continue with contract
- •Section 19: Voidable when consent caused by coercion, fraud, misrepresentation
- •Section 19A: Voidable when consent caused by undue influence
- •Remedies: Rescission + damages (if fraud/breach)
If VOID:
- •No legal effect
- •Cannot be enforced
- •Section 65: Restitution (restore advantage received)
- •Exception: In pari delicto (both equally guilty) - no restitution
Phase 5: Performance Obligations Analysis
(If contract VALID)
Section 37-50 Analysis:
Who Must Perform? (Section 40)
- •Promisor himself (if personal skill/confidence required)
- •Promisor or agent (if not personal)
- •Legal representatives (if not personal + promisor dies - Section 37)
When to Perform? (Section 46-47)
- •Specified time: At that time
- •Specified day: During business hours (9am-6pm)
- •No time specified: Within reasonable time
- •Time of essence: Delay = breach
Where to Perform? (Section 49)
- •Where agreed
- •Where reasonable from contract nature
- •Promisor's place of business (if nothing specified)
How to Perform? (Sections 37-50)
- •Exact performance (unless contract allows substantial)
- •Standard: As specified or as reasonable person would
- •Tender of performance valid (Section 38) even if not accepted (discharges)
Reciprocal Promises (Sections 51-58)
- •Mutual and independent: Performed simultaneously
- •Mutual and dependent: Order of performance matters
- •Section 53: If prevented by other party → Contract voidable + compensation
Output Format
## Contract Validity Analysis ### Contract Details - **Type**: [Contract type] - **Parties**: [Name, capacity status] - **Subject Matter**: [Description] - **Consideration**: Rs. [amount] / [description] - **Date**: [DD/MM/YYYY] ### Section 10 Validity Check | Element | Status | Analysis | |---------|--------|----------| | **1. Offer & Acceptance** | ✓/✗ | [Clear proposal and unconditional acceptance communicated / Issue: ...] | | **2. Consideration** | ✓/✗ | [Present/past/future consideration identified / Issue: ...] | | **3. Capacity** | ✓/✗ | [Both parties competent / Issue: Minor/Unsound mind/Disqualified] | | **4. Free Consent** | ✓/✗ | [No vitiation / Issue: Coercion/Fraud/Misrepresentation/Undue Influence/Mistake] | | **5. Lawful Object** | ✓/✗ | [Lawful / Issue: Section 23 violation - specify ground] | | **6. Not Expressly Void** | ✓/✗ | [Compliant / Issue: Section 26-30 violation] | | **7. Certainty** | ✓/✗ | [Terms certain / Issue: Vague/ambiguous - Section 29] | | **8. Possibility** | ✓/✗ | [Performance possible / Issue: Impossible - Section 56] | ### Classification **Status**: ✓ VALID / ⚠ VOIDABLE / ✗ VOID **Grounds** (if VOIDABLE or VOID): - [Specific statutory section + reasoning] ### Consequences **If VALID**: - Enforceable by both parties - Performance required - Breach remedies: Damages, specific performance, injunction, rescission **If VOIDABLE**: - Aggrieved party ([party name]) can: - Rescind (Section 64): Cancel + restore benefit - Affirm: Continue with contract - Remedies: Rescission + damages (Section 75 if fraud/breach) **If VOID**: - No legal effect - Not enforceable - Section 65 restitution: Restore advantage received ### Performance Obligations [If contract VALID] **[Party 1] must**: - [Obligation 1 - Section reference] - [Obligation 2 - Section reference] **[Party 2] must**: - [Obligation 1 - Section reference] - [Obligation 2 - Section reference] **Timeline**: [When performance due] **Place**: [Where performance] **Standard**: [How to perform] ### Risks and Issues **Legal Risks**: 1. [Risk 1 + mitigation] 2. [Risk 2 + mitigation] **Performance Risks**: 1. [Risk 1 + mitigation] 2. [Risk 2 + mitigation] ### Recommendations 1. [Recommendation 1] 2. [Recommendation 2] ... ### Statutory Basis - Sections: [List all applicable sections] - Case Law: [Relevant precedents]
Integration
- •Use within
/contract-advicecommand - •Use within
contract-law-specialistagent - •Combine with
remedies_evaluatorskill for breach scenarios
Version: 1.0.0 Domain: Contract Law (India)