workspace-review-changes
Overview
This skill reviews code changes across all repositories in a workspace by delegating to the workspace-repo-review-changes agent for each repository. It collects all review results and provides a comprehensive summary.
Critical: File Path Rules
ALWAYS use paths relative to the project root (where .claude/ directory exists).
When accessing workspace files, use paths like:
- •
workspace/{workspace-name}/reviews/{timestamp}/*.md
DO NOT use absolute paths (starting with /) for workspace files. The permission system requires relative paths from the project root.
Steps
1. Workspace
Required: User must specify the workspace.
- •If workspace is not specified, abort with message:
Please specify a workspace. Example:
/workspace-review-changes workspace/feature-user-auth-20260116 - •Workspace format:
workspace/{workspace-name}or just{workspace-name}
2. Find Repositories
Find all repository worktrees in the workspace:
./.claude/scripts/list-workspace-repos.sh {workspace-name}
For each repository:
- •Extract the repository name
- •Determine the base branch (from README.md)
- •Prepare parameters for the review agent
3. Create Reviews Directory
Run the script to create a timestamped review directory. Important: Capture the output path and reuse it for all parallel agents to ensure consistency.
REVIEW_DIR=$(.claude/skills/workspace-review-changes/scripts/prepare-review-dir.sh {workspace-name})
The script outputs the created directory path (e.g., workspace/{workspace-name}/reviews/20260116-103045).
4. Delegate to Review and Verification Agents for Each Repository
For each repository in the workspace, launch both agents in parallel:
4a. Code Review Agent
Task tool:
subagent_type: workspace-repo-review-changes
run_in_background: true
prompt: |
Workspace: {workspace-name}
Repository: {org/repo-path}
Base Branch: {base-branch}
Review Timestamp: {timestamp}
What the agent does (defined in agent, not by prompt):
- •Compares current branch against remote base branch
- •Reviews code for security, performance, and quality issues
- •Writes review report to the review directory
4b. TODO Verification Agent
Task tool:
subagent_type: workspace-repo-todo-verifier
run_in_background: true
prompt: |
Workspace: {workspace-name}
Repository: {org/repo-path}
Base Branch: {base-branch}
Review Timestamp: {timestamp}
What the agent does (defined in agent, not by prompt):
- •Reads TODO file and parses all items
- •Verifies each TODO against actual code changes
- •Writes verification report (
TODO-VERIFY-{org}_{repo}.md) to review directory
Example filenames: For repository github.com/sters/ai-workspace:
- •Code review:
REVIEW-github.com_sters_ai-workspace.md - •TODO verification:
TODO-VERIFY-github.com_sters_ai-workspace.md
Important: Launch ALL agents (both review and verification for all repos) in parallel in a single message. Pass the same {timestamp} value to all agents.
5. Collect Review Results and Create Summary Report
After all review agents complete, use the Task tool to launch the workspace-collect-reviews agent:
Task tool:
subagent_type: workspace-collect-reviews
run_in_background: true
prompt: |
Workspace: {workspace-name}
Review Timestamp: {timestamp}
What the agent does (defined in agent, not by prompt):
- •Read all review files and extract statistics
- •Create
SUMMARY.mdin the review directory - •Return aggregated results for presenting to the user
6. Commit Workspace Snapshot
After all reviews complete, commit the workspace changes (including review results):
./.claude/scripts/commit-workspace-snapshot.sh {workspace-name}
7. Present Summary to User
Display a concise summary to the user using ONLY the statistics returned from the workspace-collect-reviews agent response.
CRITICAL: DO NOT read the SUMMARY.md or any review files to present results. This will cause context explosion.
Present to user:
- •The stats from the agent response (repos, critical, warnings, suggestions, completion rate)
- •The file path to SUMMARY.md for detailed review
- •Ask if they want to proceed to PR creation
Example output:
## Review Complete Reviewed 2 repositories in workspace/feature-x-20260116 **Results**: 0 critical, 3 warnings, 5 suggestions **TODO Completion**: 95% (19/20 items verified) **Full Report**: workspace/feature-x-20260116/reviews/20260116-103045/SUMMARY.md Would you like to create pull requests?
Example Usage
Example 1: Review Current Workspace
User: Review the changes in my current workspace Assistant: Let me review the workspace. First, I'll identify which workspace you're working in... [Identifies repositories, launches review agents] [After completion] Review complete! I found 2 critical issues and 5 warnings across 3 repositories. Summary: workspace/feature-user-auth-20260116/reviews/20260116-103045/SUMMARY.md
Example 2: Review Specific Workspace
User: Review workspace/feature-login-fix-20260115 Assistant: I'll review the workspace/feature-login-fix-20260115 workspace... [Identifies 2 repositories, launches agents in parallel] [After completion] Review complete! All changes look good with 0 critical issues and 3 suggestions.
Next Steps - Ask User to Proceed
After review is complete, always ask the user whether to proceed with the next step using AskUserQuestion:
AskUserQuestion tool:
questions:
- question: "Code review complete. Would you like to create pull requests for the changes?"
header: "Next Step"
multiSelect: false
options:
- label: "Create PRs (draft)"
description: "Run /workspace-create-or-update-pr to create draft pull requests"
- label: "Create PRs (ready for review)"
description: "Create non-draft pull requests immediately"
- label: "Fix issues first"
description: "I need to address the review findings before creating PRs"
Based on the user's selection:
- •"Create PRs (draft)" → Invoke the
/workspace-create-or-update-prskill using the Skill tool (default draft mode) - •"Create PRs (ready for review)" → Invoke the
/workspace-create-or-update-prskill with non-draft option - •"Fix issues first" → End the workflow so user can address review findings
Notes
- •The skill delegates actual review work to the
workspace-repo-review-changesagent - •Each repository is reviewed independently and in parallel
- •Review results are timestamped to avoid overwriting previous reviews
- •The summary provides a high-level view while individual reports contain detailed findings
- •Launch all repository review agents in parallel for faster execution
- •If a repository review fails, continue with others and report which failed
- •Always replace slashes (
/) in repository paths with underscores (_) when generating filenames