BDD Assistant
Language: English | 繁體中文
Version: 1.0.0 Last Updated: 2026-01-19 Applicability: Claude Code Skills
Purpose
This skill guides developers through the Behavior-Driven Development workflow, helping them:
- •Conduct Discovery sessions to explore requirements
- •Write effective Gherkin scenarios in Given-When-Then format
- •Create reusable step definitions
- •Integrate BDD with TDD for implementation
- •Maintain living documentation
Quick Reference
BDD Workflow Checklist
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ 🔍 DISCOVERY Phase │ │ □ Stakeholders identified (Business, Dev, QA) │ │ □ User story discussed and understood │ │ □ Concrete examples collected (Example Mapping) │ │ □ Edge cases identified │ │ □ Questions answered or noted for follow-up │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ 📝 FORMULATION Phase │ │ □ Scenarios use correct Gherkin syntax │ │ □ Scenarios are declarative (WHAT, not HOW) │ │ □ Business language used (no technical jargon) │ │ □ Each scenario is independent and self-contained │ │ □ Scenarios have 5-10 steps maximum │ │ □ Scenarios reviewed by stakeholders │ ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤ │ ⚙️ AUTOMATION Phase │ │ □ Step definitions created for all steps │ │ □ Step definitions are reusable │ │ □ Scenarios fail initially (RED) │ │ □ TDD used for unit-level implementations │ │ □ All scenarios pass (GREEN) │ │ □ Code refactored and clean │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Gherkin Quick Reference
| Keyword | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
Feature | Container for scenarios | Feature: User Login |
Scenario | Single test case | Scenario: Successful login |
Given | Set up initial context | Given I am on the login page |
When | Trigger action | When I enter valid credentials |
Then | Assert outcome | Then I should see my dashboard |
And/But | Continue previous | And I should see a welcome message |
Background | Common setup | Runs before each scenario |
Scenario Outline | Data-driven | Template with Examples table |
Declarative vs Imperative
# ❌ BAD - Imperative (too detailed, UI-focused) Scenario: Login Given I navigate to "http://example.com/login" And I click on the username field And I type "john@example.com" And I click on the password field And I type "secret123" And I click the submit button Then I should see "Dashboard" in the page title # ✅ GOOD - Declarative (behavior-focused) Scenario: Successful login with valid credentials Given I am a registered user When I login with valid credentials Then I should see my dashboard
Three Amigos Quick Reference
| Role | Focus | Questions to Ask |
|---|---|---|
| Business (PO/BA) | What & Why | "What's the value?", "Who are the users?" |
| Development | How | "What's the technical impact?", "Dependencies?" |
| Testing (QA) | What if | "What could go wrong?", "Edge cases?" |
Workflow Assistance
Discovery Phase Guidance
When exploring requirements:
- •
Example Mapping
code🟡 User Story: "User can login" │ ├─ 🔵 Rule: "Users must be authenticated" │ ├─ 🟢 Example: Valid credentials → login success │ └─ 🟢 Example: Invalid credentials → error message │ ├─ 🔵 Rule: "Account lockout after failures" │ ├─ 🟢 Example: 3 failures → account locked │ └─ 🟢 Example: Locked account → cannot login │ └─ 🔴 Question: Password expiration policy? - •
Questions to Ask
- •What's the happy path?
- •What could go wrong?
- •What are the boundary conditions?
- •What's explicitly out of scope?
Formulation Phase Guidance
When writing scenarios:
- •
Feature File Structure
gherkinFeature: Feature name As a [role] I want [feature] So that [benefit] Background: Given common preconditions Scenario: Descriptive scenario name Given [initial context] When [action] Then [expected outcome] - •
Scenario Style Guidelines
- •One behavior per scenario
- •Use business language
- •Keep steps declarative
- •Aim for 5-10 steps maximum
- •Make scenarios independent
Automation Phase Guidance
When implementing:
- •
Step Definition Best Practices
typescript// ✅ Good: Reusable, parameterized Given('I have {int} items in my cart', (count) => { ... }); // ❌ Bad: Specific to one scenario Given('I have 3 widgets in my cart', () => { ... }); - •
BDD + TDD Integration
codeBDD Scenario (feature level) │ └──▶ Step Definitions │ └──▶ TDD Cycle (unit level) 🔴 Write failing unit test 🟢 Implement minimal code 🔵 Refactor
Integration with Other Workflows
BDD + SDD
When working with Spec-Driven Development:
# Reference spec in feature file
# @spec SPEC-001
@SPEC-001
Feature: User Authentication
Implements SPEC-001 user authentication requirements.
@AC-1
Scenario: Successful login
# Acceptance Criterion 1 from SPEC-001
...
BDD + TDD
Scenario Level (BDD) Unit Level (TDD) ───────────────────── ───────────────── Scenario: Checkout ──────▶ test_calculate_total() Given cart items test_apply_discount() When checkout test_create_order() Then order created test_send_email()
BDD + ATDD
ATDD: Acceptance Criteria (business sign-off)
│
└──▶ BDD: Feature Files (Gherkin scenarios)
│
└──▶ TDD: Unit Tests (implementation)
Configuration Detection
This skill supports project-specific configuration.
Detection Order
- •Check
CONTRIBUTING.mdfor "Disabled Skills" section- •If this skill is listed, it is disabled for this project
- •Check
CONTRIBUTING.mdfor "BDD Standards" section - •Check for existing
.featurefiles in the codebase - •If not found, default to standard BDD practices
First-Time Setup
If no configuration found and context is unclear:
- •
Ask: "This project hasn't configured BDD preferences. Which BDD tool do you use?"
- •Cucumber (JavaScript/TypeScript)
- •Behave (Python)
- •SpecFlow (C#)
- •Other
- •
After selection, suggest documenting in
CONTRIBUTING.md:
## BDD Standards ### BDD Tool - Cucumber.js ### Feature File Location - `features/` directory ### Scenario Style - Declarative (behavior-focused) - Business language required - Max 10 steps per scenario
Detailed Guidelines
For complete standards, see:
For related standards:
Anti-Patterns Quick Detection
| Symptom | Likely Problem | Quick Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Scenarios break on UI changes | Imperative style | Use declarative language |
| Business can't read scenarios | Technical jargon | Use business language |
| Scenarios pass but features don't work | Missing scenarios | Better Discovery sessions |
| Too many scenarios | Scenario explosion | Use Scenario Outlines |
| Step definitions duplicated | Not reusable | Extract to helpers |
Related Standards
- •Behavior-Driven Development - Core BDD standard
- •Acceptance Test-Driven Development - ATDD standard
- •Test-Driven Development - TDD standard
- •Spec-Driven Development - SDD workflow
- •Testing Standards - Testing framework
- •TDD Assistant - TDD skill
Version History
| Version | Date | Changes |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.0 | 2026-01-19 | Initial release |
License
This skill is released under CC BY 4.0.
Source: universal-dev-standards