AgentSkillsCN

interactive-review

带有Web UI的交互式Markdown审查。当用户说“审查这个”、“检查这个计划”、“反馈”、“帮我审查一下”、“review”或指定要审查的文件路径时使用。打开基于浏览器的审查界面,配有复选框和内联评论。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: interactive-review
description: "Interactive markdown review with web UI. Use when user says 'review this', 'check this plan', '피드백', '검토해줘', 'review', or specifies a file path to review. Opens a browser-based review interface with checkboxes and inline comments."

Interactive Review Skill

Open an interactive web UI where users review content with checkboxes and comments.

How It Works

  1. Determine the content source:
    • File path specified: Use Read tool to get file contents
    • Content provided directly: Use that content as-is
    • Otherwise: Collect the most recent relevant content from the conversation
  2. Call mcp__interactive_review__start_review with the content
  3. Browser window opens automatically with the review UI
  4. User reviews each item (check/uncheck, add comments)
  5. User clicks Submit
  6. Process the feedback and respond accordingly

Content Sources (Priority Order)

  1. Explicit file path: "review /path/to/file.md" or "이 파일 리뷰해줘: README.md"
  2. Direct content: User provides or references specific content
  3. Conversation context: Extract relevant content from recent conversation

Usage

code
# If file path is specified, read it first:
Read({ "file_path": "/path/to/file.md" })

# Then start the review:
mcp__interactive_review__start_review({
  "content": "<content from file or conversation>",
  "title": "<descriptive title>"
})

Processing Results

The tool returns JSON with review items:

checkedcommentAction
trueemptyApproved - proceed as planned
truehas textApproved with note - consider the feedback
falsehas textRejected - modify according to comment
falseemptyRejected - remove or reconsider this item

Response Template

After receiving feedback:

code
## Review Summary

**Approved**: X items
**Needs revision**: Y items

### Items requiring changes:
- [Item]: [User's comment]

Would you like me to:
1. Proceed with approved items
2. Revise the rejected items based on feedback
3. Both - revise then proceed