Project Constitution Generator

Create a personalized project constitution that defines your team's coding principles, patterns, and governance.

The Job

•Ask the user about their project's coding philosophy and standards
•Analyze the project structure and documentation
•Generate personalized constitution based on their answers → relentless/constitution.md
•Generate personalized agent prompt based on the same analysis → relentless/prompt.md
•Ensure consistency with project templates and documentation

Important: The constitution is the foundation for all feature work - create this before generating features.

Upgrade Detection (For Existing Users)

If relentless/constitution.md and/or relentless/prompt.md already exist:

Step 0: Check for Template Updates

•
Read current files:
- •Check version in existing constitution.md (look for  or **Template Version:**)
- •Check generated date in existing prompt.md
•
Compare with templates:
- •Read .claude/skills/constitution/templates/constitution.md
- •Read .claude/skills/constitution/templates/prompt.md
- •Check template VERSION comments for changes
•
Detect changes:
- •If template version > existing version → Offer upgrade
- •If template has new sections → Offer selective merge
- •If quality commands changed → Offer prompt.md refresh

•

Offer upgrade options:

markdown

## Upgrade Available

Your constitution.md is v2.0.0, template is v2.1.0.

Changes in v2.1.0:
- Added SpecKit workflow documentation
- Enhanced TDD requirements
- Added quality gates section

Options:
A. Full upgrade (backup existing, apply template changes)
B. Selective merge (show diff, choose sections)
C. Skip upgrade (keep existing)
D. Regenerate from scratch (lose customizations)

•
If upgrading:
- •Backup existing files to *.backup
- •Apply template changes preserving customizations
- •Update version number
- •Update LAST_AMENDED_DATE to today

Step 1: Gather Project Information

Ask essential questions about the project:

Project Identity:

•Project name?
•Primary programming language(s)?
•Tech stack (frameworks, libraries)?

Testing Philosophy:

•Testing approach? (TDD, test after, pragmatic)
•Required test coverage?
•Testing frameworks preferred?

Code Quality:

•Linting/formatting tools?
•Required checks before commit? (typecheck, lint, test)
•Code review requirements?

Architecture Principles:

•Preferred patterns? (MVC, clean architecture, etc.)
•Modularity requirements?
•Performance expectations?

Version Control:

•Branch naming conventions?
•Commit message format?
•CI/CD requirements?

Step 2: Generate Constitution

Load the template from templates/constitution.md and:

•Replace all [PLACEHOLDER] tokens with concrete values from user answers
•Add/remove principles based on project needs (template is a starting point)
•
Ensure each principle has:
- •MUST rules (enforced, blocking)
- •SHOULD rules (best practices, warnings)
- •Clear rationale
•Set version to 1.0.0 for new constitutions
•Set ratification date to today
•Add governance section with amendment procedures

Step 3: Analyze Project Structure

Read and analyze project documentation:

Core Files:

•README.md - Project overview, setup instructions
•AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md - Developer guidelines
•package.json - Scripts, dependencies, tech stack
•CONTRIBUTING.md - Contribution workflow (if exists)

Extract:

•Tech stack (TypeScript, React, Node, etc.)
•Testing framework (vitest, jest, playwright)
•Quality commands (typecheck, lint, test)
•Build system (bun, npm, turbo, vite)
•Linting setup (eslint, biome)
•File structure patterns

Step 4: Generate Personalized Prompt

Load the base template from templates/prompt.md and personalize it:

Must include spec/plan/tasks awareness so the agent reads spec.md and plan.md in full before execution, and reads only the relevant user story section from tasks.md for the current story.

Base Template Location: templates/prompt.md

Create a personalized prompt.md with:

Section 1: Quality Gates

markdown

## CRITICAL: Quality Gates (Non-Negotiable)

Before marking ANY story as complete:

\`\`\`bash
# TypeScript (detected from package.json)
[actual typecheck command from package.json scripts]

# Linting (detected from package.json)
[actual lint command from package.json scripts]

# Tests (detected from package.json)
[actual test command from package.json scripts]
\`\`\`

**If ANY check fails, DO NOT mark the story as complete.**

Section 2: Project-Specific Patterns (from README/AGENTS.md)

•Monorepo structure (if applicable)
•Component locations
•Test file patterns
•Database/backend info
•Styling approach

Section 3: TDD Workflow (MANDATORY)

•Test-first workflow (write tests BEFORE implementation)
•Test location patterns
•Test commands
•Verification that tests FAIL before implementation

Section 4: Routing Awareness

•Explanation of routing metadata in prd.json
•Complexity levels (simple/medium/complex/expert)
•Cost optimization modes (free/cheap/good/genius)

Section 5: SpecKit Workflow

•Full workflow: specify → plan → tasks → convert → analyze → implement
•Artifact awareness: spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, checklist.md, prd.json

Section 6: Common Pitfalls (from AGENTS.md/docs)

•Project-specific gotchas
•Known issues
•Best practices

Footer:

markdown

---
**Personalized for [Project Name]**
**Generated:** [date]
**Re-generate:** /relentless.constitution

Save to: relentless/prompt.md

Step 5: Validate & Save

Before saving:

Constitution:

•No [PLACEHOLDER] tokens remain
•All dates in ISO format (YYYY-MM-DD)
•Principles are declarative and testable
•Version format is semantic (X.Y.Z)

Prompt:

•All quality commands are actual commands from package.json
•File patterns match project structure
•No generic placeholders remain

Save both files:

•relentless/constitution.md
•relentless/prompt.md

Run the validators to ensure both files are correctly formatted:

bash

# Validate constitution.md
.claude/skills/validators/scripts/validate-constitution.sh "relentless/constitution.md"

# Validate prompt.md
.claude/skills/validators/scripts/validate-prompt.sh "relentless/prompt.md"

•If validation fails, fix the errors and re-run
•Warnings are acceptable but should be reviewed

Step 6: Report

Output summary:

code

✓ Created constitution.md
  - Version: 1.0.0
  - Principles: [count]
  - Key rules: [summary]

✓ Created prompt.md
  - Quality gates: [count]
  - Tech stack: [detected stack]
  - Test framework: [detected]

Next steps:
1. Review both files
2. Create your first feature: /relentless.specify "feature description"

Updating Existing Files

If relentless/constitution.md or relentless/prompt.md exist:

For Constitution Updates:

•Load current version
•Ask what needs to change
•
Increment version appropriately:
- •MAJOR: Breaking changes to principles
- •MINOR: New principles added
- •PATCH: Clarifications, typo fixes
•Update LAST_AMENDED_DATE to today
•Add amendment notes at top

For Prompt Updates:

•Re-analyze project structure (package.json, docs)
•Detect any new quality commands or patterns
•Regenerate personalized sections
•Preserve any manual customizations in comments
•Update "Generated" date

Both files can be regenerated at any time by running /relentless.constitution again.

Example Constitution Structure

markdown

# Project Constitution

**Version:** 1.0.0  
**Ratified:** 2026-01-11  
**Last Amended:** 2026-01-11

## Principles

### Principle 1: Type Safety
**MUST:**
- All code must pass TypeScript strict mode
- No `any` types except in documented cases

**SHOULD:**
- Use Zod for runtime validation
- Prefer inference over explicit types

**Rationale:** Type safety prevents runtime errors and improves maintainability.

### Principle 2: Testing
**MUST:**
- All features must have unit tests
- CI must pass before merging

**SHOULD:**
- Aim for 80% coverage
- Write tests before implementation (TDD)

**Rationale:** Tests document behavior and prevent regressions.

## Governance

**Amendment Process:**
1. Propose changes via PR
2. Discuss with team
3. Update version semantically
4. Document rationale

**Compliance:**
- Constitution checked before each feature implementation
- Violations block PR merge