Implementation Review
Comprehensive review of feature implementations against specifications and organizational standards.
When to Use
- •Implementing or completing new features
- •Validating spec compliance before merge
- •Checking API implementation correctness
- •Preparing release readiness assessments
Instructions
Step 1: Gather Context
- •Identify the implementation scope:
bash
git diff --name-only HEAD~5 git status
- •Locate relevant specification:
UPP-1.3.spec.mdor related spec files - •Identify affected providers/modules
Step 2: Spawn Review Sub-Agents
Delegate parallel reviews to sub-agents for:
| Agent Focus | Review Scope |
|---|---|
| Spec Compliance | Compare implementation against spec requirements |
| Code Standards | Organizational consistency, naming, patterns |
| API Validation | Search web to validate API parameters, endpoints, payloads |
| Regression Check | Search codebase for potential breaking changes |
Step 3: Synthesize Reports
Collect sub-agent findings and compile:
- •Compliance gaps - Missing or incorrect spec implementations
- •Quality issues - Code smells, inconsistencies, design concerns
- •API correctness - Validated against official documentation
- •Regression risks - Potential breaking changes identified
Output Format
markdown
# Implementation Review Report ## Summary [One paragraph overview] ## Spec Compliance: [PASS/PARTIAL/FAIL] - [ ] Requirement 1 - [ ] Requirement 2 ## Code Quality Issues | Severity | File | Issue | Recommendation | |----------|------|-------|----------------| ## API Validation [Findings from web search validation] ## Regression Risks [Identified risks and mitigation] ## Release Readiness: [READY/BLOCKED/NEEDS WORK] [Estimation with blockers listed]
Notes
- •Always validate external API usage against current documentation
- •Cross-reference with existing provider implementations for consistency
- •Flag any deviations from established patterns