Agent Code Review

Orchestrate parallel sub-agent reviews for comprehensive code analysis and actionable feedback.

When to Use

• •Deep code review before merge
• •Bug hunting and regression detection
• •Getting alternative implementation perspectives
• •Validating library/API usage correctness

Instructions

Step 1: Determine Review Scope

Identify what to review:

# Option A: Recent changes
git diff HEAD~1

# Option B: Staged changes  
git diff --staged

# Option C: Specific commit range
git log --oneline -10  # then select range

# Option D: Current working state
git status

Step 2: Spawn Review Sub-Agents

Deploy parallel sub-agents with focused tasks:

Prompt each sub-agent with:

"Perform a comprehensive code review of [scope]. Investigate spec compliance, coding standards consistency, and validate any API/library usage against current documentation. Report findings as actionable items."

Step 3: Collect and Synthesize

Aggregate sub-agent reports into:

1. •Critical issues requiring immediate fix
2. •Recommendations for improvement
3. •Alternative approaches worth considering
4. •Regression risks with resolution plans

Output Format

# Code Review Report

## Files Reviewed
- `path/to/file1.ts`
- `path/to/file2.ts`

## Critical Issues 🔴
| File | Line | Issue | Fix |
|------|------|-------|-----|

## Recommendations 🟡
| File | Line | Suggestion | Rationale |
|------|------|------------|-----------|

## Alternative Perspectives 🔵
[Alternative implementation approaches from sub-agents]

## Regression Analysis
| Risk | Affected Area | Resolution Plan |
|------|---------------|-----------------|

## Action Items
- [ ] Fix: [critical item]
- [ ] Consider: [recommendation]
- [ ] Verify: [needs validation]

Notes

• •Sub-agents should search the codebase for similar patterns before suggesting changes
• •Always create resolution plans for identified regressions
• •Validate external dependencies against their official documentation