AgentSkillsCN

Codex 2nd

先获取 Codex 的代码相关第二意见（英文版），随后以日语展开讨论。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
description: Get a repo-aware 2nd opinion from Codex (English), then discuss in Japanese.
argument-hint: "One extra instruction/constraint to pass through (free-form)."
allowed-tools: Bash(codex exec:*)

Task (Claude Code)

We are mid-discussion. Use this command to obtain a 2nd opinion from Codex to complement our current findings.

Requirements:

  • •Communicate with Codex in English.
  • •Assume the repo contains AGENTS.md with baseline project context; Codex may read it but must not restate it.
  • •Prefer no back-and-forth: Codex should gather necessary info by inspecting the repo itself. If uncertain, Codex should state assumptions explicitly and proceed. Questions are a last resort.

1) Write a compact English brief (tight)

Include only:

  • •Goal / decision (1–2 lines)
  • •What we already know / tried / observed (bullets)
  • •Constraints / non-goals (bullets)
  • •Extra instruction from user (verbatim): "$ARGUMENTS"

2) Run Codex via Bash tool (read-only, no approvals; prompt via stdin)

Using the Bash tool, run exactly the command below after you paste the brief. IMPORTANT: Set Bash tool timeout: 600000 (10 min) because Codex may take 5+ minutes to respond.

bash
RUST_LOG=RUST_LOG=off codex exec --sandbox read-only 2>/dev/null - <<'CODEX_PROMPT'
You are Codex, acting as a senior engineer providing a second opinion.

Operating rules:
- English only.
- Independently inspect the repository as needed (read-only). You may run safe read-only commands (e.g., git status/log/diff, rg, ls, cat) and open relevant files.
- Read AGENTS.md for baseline context, but DO NOT restate it.
- No web browsing; stay within the repo and local signals.
- Prefer not to ask questions. If uncertain, list assumptions and proceed.

What I want from you (best-practice + pragmatic + thorough repo inspection):
1) Top blind spots / risks (prioritized, concise)
2) Recommended approach (best practices + pragmatic compromise), with trade-offs
3) Concrete next steps (ordered, max 7, each step actionable in this repo)
4) Assumptions made (explicit)

=== CONTEXT FROM CLAUDE CODE (English brief) ===
<PASTE_BRIEF_HERE>
CODEX_PROMPT

3) Share back to the user (Japanese, conversational)

Summarize Codex's result in Japanese and continue discussion naturally:
	•	重要な指摘（必要なら3つ以上でもOK）
	•	次にやること（目安5つ前後、順番つき）
	•	追加で当たるべき調査ポイント（ファイル名/grep観点/コマンド例など）
	•	必要なら、確認質問や選択肢も提示してOK