AgentSkillsCN

claims-extractor

从论文或手稿中提取关键主张、贡献与假设，并将其记录至 `output/CLAIMS.md`，同时附上来源位置的追溯链接。 **触发条件**：主张提取器、提取主张、贡献、假设、同行评审、审稿、主张提取。 **适用场景**：在审稿或证据审核过程中，需要将主张列表落实到原文位置（章节/页码/引文），并确保可追溯。 **若跳过**：如果没有可用的手稿或全文（例如缺少 `output/PAPER.md` 或等价文本）。 **网络环境**：无需联网。 **行为准则**：每条主张都必须附带可定位的来源指针；区分实证性主张与概念性主张。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: claims-extractor
description: |
  Extract key claims, contributions, and assumptions from a paper/manuscript into `output/CLAIMS.md` with traceability to source locations.
  **Trigger**: claims extractor, extract claims, contributions, assumptions, peer review, 审稿, 主张提取.
  **Use when**: 审稿/评审或 evidence audit，需要把主张列表落盘并可追溯到原文位置（section/page/quote）。
  **Skip if**: 没有可用的稿件/全文（例如缺少 `output/PAPER.md` 或等价文本）。
  **Network**: none.
  **Guardrail**: 每条 claim 必须带可定位的 source pointer；区分 empirical vs conceptual claims。

Claims Extractor (peer review)

Goal: turn a manuscript into an auditable list of claims that downstream skills can check.

Inputs

Required:

  • •output/PAPER.md (or equivalent plain-text manuscript)

Optional:

  • •DECISIONS.md (review scope or constraints)

Outputs

  • •output/CLAIMS.md

Output format (recommended)

For each claim, include at minimum:

  • •Claim: one sentence
  • •Type: empirical | conceptual
  • •Scope: what the claim applies to / what it does not apply to
  • •Source: a locatable pointer into output/PAPER.md (section + page/figure/table + a short quote)

Workflow

  1. •If DECISIONS.md exists, apply any review scope/format constraints.
  2. •Read the manuscript (output/PAPER.md) end-to-end (at least abstract + intro + method + experiments + limitations).
  3. •Extract:
    • •primary contributions (what is new)
    • •key claims (what is asserted)
    • •assumptions (what must be true for claims to hold)
  4. •Normalize each item into one sentence.
  5. •Attach a source pointer for every item.
  6. •Split into two sections:
    • •Empirical claims (must be backed by experiments/data)
    • •Conceptual claims (must be backed by argument/definition)

Definition of Done

  • • output/CLAIMS.md exists.
  • • Every claim has a source pointer that can be located in output/PAPER.md.
  • • Empirical vs conceptual claims are clearly separated.

Troubleshooting

Issue: the paper is only a PDF or HTML

Fix:

  • •Convert/extract it into a plain-text output/PAPER.md first (even rough extraction is OK), then run claim extraction.

Issue: claims are vague (“significant”, “better”, “state-of-the-art”)

Fix:

  • •Rewrite each claim to include the measurable dimension (metric/dataset/baseline) or mark it as “underspecified” with a note.