AgentSkillsCN

Plan Review

当用户请求“检查这段代码”“验证这段代码”“核实这段实现”“这是正确的吗”“审查这段代码”“检查错误”“多代理验证”，或提及生产级关键代码、财务计算、安全实现，或高风险操作时，应使用此技能。它提供全面的多代理验证工作流，配备专业的评审代理。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: Plan Review
description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "review the plan", "check the execution plan", "validate this plan", "is this plan good", or automatically after the planner agent creates an execution plan. Validates plans for completeness, clarity, measurability, and proper acceptance criteria before execution begins.
version: 0.1.0

Plan Review: Validate Execution Plans

Purpose

Review and validate execution plans before code changes begin, ensuring plans have clear acceptance criteria, appropriate critic assignments, and realistic scope.

When to Use

  • •After planner agent creates execution plan
  • •When user explicitly requests plan review
  • •Before high-stakes operations (configured in highStakesPatterns)

Validation Criteria

Completeness Checks

✓ Scope defined: Files, operations, and boundaries clear ✓ Success criteria present: At least 3 specific, measurable criteria ✓ Critic assignment: Each criterion mapped to responsible critic ✓ Retry budget set: Escalation path defined ✓ Cost estimate included: Token overhead calculated

Quality Gates

Acceptance criteria must be:

  • •Specific (not "good code" but "all tests pass, coverage >80%")
  • •Measurable (binary pass/fail, not subjective)
  • •Pre-declared (before execution, not emergent)
  • •Mapped to critics (clear veto authority assignment)

Domain-specific patterns:

  • •Financial: Must specify precision, rounding method, audit requirements
  • •Security: Must reference OWASP checklist, auth patterns
  • •Performance: Must define latency SLAs, memory limits

Review Process

  1. •Parse plan structure - Extract scope, criteria, critics, budget
  2. •Check completeness - Verify all required sections present
  3. •Validate criteria - Ensure specific and measurable
  4. •Verify critic mapping - Each criterion has responsible critic
  5. •Check domain patterns - Apply domain-specific requirements
  6. •Estimate feasibility - Scope appropriate for retry budget
  7. •Present findings - Show issues and recommendations

Example Reviews

Good Plan

code
EXECUTION PLAN ✓

Scope: Refactor auth to JWT ✓
Files: src/auth/*.ts ✓

SUCCESS CRITERIA: ✓
✓ All 18 existing tests pass (Code Critic validates)
✓ No OWASP Top 10 violations (Security Critic validates)
✓ Token storage uses httpOnly cookies (Security Critic validates)
✓ Token refresh handles 401 (Code Critic validates)
✓ Coverage maintains 85%+ (Code Critic validates)

Critics: code, security ✓
Budget: 6 iterations ✓
Cost: +40% tokens ($0.15) ✓

Plan Needs Improvement

code
EXECUTION PLAN ❌

Scope: Make the code better ❌ TOO VAGUE
Files: Not specified ❌ MISSING

SUCCESS CRITERIA: ❌
- Code should be high quality ❌ NOT MEASURABLE
- No bugs ❌ NOT SPECIFIC
- Fast performance ❌ NO THRESHOLD

Critics: None assigned ❌
Budget: Not set ❌

Required fixes:

  1. •Define specific scope and files
  2. •Make criteria measurable (e.g., "all tests pass", "latency <200ms")
  3. •Assign critics to each criterion
  4. •Set retry budget

Configuration

Plans automatically reviewed when autoVerify: true in settings.

For manual review, invoke explicitly after planning phase.

Additional Resources

  • •references/acceptance-criteria-patterns.md - Domain-specific criteria templates
  • •references/plan-examples.md - Good and bad plan examples