Test Suite Prioritizer

Intelligently prioritize test execution based on code changes and project impact.

Core Capabilities

This skill helps optimize test execution by:

•Analyzing code changes - Identifying which files were modified
•Mapping test coverage - Determining which tests cover changed code
•Calculating priority scores - Ranking tests by impact and relevance
•Generating execution order - Creating an optimized test run sequence
•Providing reasoning - Explaining why each test is prioritized

Test Prioritization Workflow

Step 1: Identify Code Changes

Determine what code has been modified to focus testing efforts.

Sources of Change Information:

•Git diff (most recent commit or uncommitted changes)
•Pull request file list
•Specific files mentioned by user
•Modified files in working directory

Collect Changed Files:

bash

# Recent commit changes
git diff --name-only HEAD~1 HEAD

# Uncommitted changes
git diff --name-only

# Changes in current branch vs main
git diff --name-only main...HEAD

# Files in last N commits
git diff --name-only HEAD~N HEAD

Example Output:

code

src/auth/login.py
src/payment/processor.py
src/models/user.py
tests/test_auth.py

Step 2: Analyze Test Coverage

Map which tests cover the changed code.

Strategies:

1. Direct Test-to-Code Mapping

•Tests in same directory as changed code
•Tests with similar names (e.g., user.py → test_user.py)
•Integration tests that import changed modules

2. Static Analysis

•Parse test files for imports
•Identify which modules each test uses
•Map dependencies transitively

3. Coverage Data (if available)

•Use pytest-cov, coverage.py, JaCoCo output
•Identify tests that execute changed lines
•Most accurate but requires prior test run

Example Mapping:

code

Changed: src/auth/login.py
Covered by:
  - tests/test_auth.py::test_login_success
  - tests/test_auth.py::test_login_failure
  - tests/integration/test_user_flow.py::test_complete_registration
  - tests/e2e/test_authentication_flow.py::test_full_auth_cycle

Changed: src/payment/processor.py
Covered by:
  - tests/test_payment.py::test_process_payment
  - tests/test_payment.py::test_refund
  - tests/integration/test_checkout.py::test_complete_purchase

Step 3: Calculate Priority Scores

Assign priority scores based on change impact.

Scoring Formula:

code

Priority Score = Base Score × Change Impact Factor

Base Score factors:
- Direct coverage of changed file: +10 points
- Indirect coverage (imports changed file): +5 points
- Integration test covering changed area: +3 points
- Test in same module: +2 points

Change Impact Factor (multiply):
- Critical path code (auth, payments): ×1.5
- Recently failed test: ×1.3
- High historical failure rate: ×1.2
- Core business logic: ×1.2
- UI/cosmetic changes: ×0.8

Example Scoring:

python

# Example: test_login_success
base_score = 10  # Directly tests login.py (changed)
impact_factor = 1.5  # Auth is critical path
priority_score = 10 × 1.5 = 15

# Example: test_user_flow
base_score = 5 + 3  # Imports login.py + integration test
impact_factor = 1.2  # Core business logic
priority_score = 8 × 1.2 = 9.6

# Example: test_ui_styling
base_score = 2  # Same module as changed file
impact_factor = 0.8  # UI/cosmetic
priority_score = 2 × 0.8 = 1.6

Step 4: Generate Prioritized Test List

Create ordered execution sequence with scores and reasoning.

Output Format:

markdown

# Test Execution Priority List

## Summary
- Total tests analyzed: 45
- High priority (score ≥ 10): 8 tests
- Medium priority (score 5-9): 15 tests
- Low priority (score < 5): 22 tests
- Estimated time for high priority tests: ~2 minutes

## Recommended Execution Order

### Priority 1: Critical Tests (Run First)

1. **tests/test_auth.py::test_login_success** (Score: 15.0)
   - Directly tests modified file: src/auth/login.py
   - Critical path: Authentication
   - Reason: Core security functionality changed

2. **tests/test_auth.py::test_login_failure** (Score: 15.0)
   - Directly tests modified file: src/auth/login.py
   - Critical path: Authentication
   - Reason: Error handling for authentication changed

3. **tests/test_payment.py::test_process_payment** (Score: 15.0)
   - Directly tests modified file: src/payment/processor.py
   - Critical path: Payment processing
   - Reason: Payment logic modified, high business impact

### Priority 2: High Impact Tests

4. **tests/integration/test_user_flow.py::test_complete_registration** (Score: 9.6)
   - Indirect coverage: Imports src/auth/login.py
   - Integration test: End-to-end user flow
   - Reason: Validates auth changes in realistic scenario

5. **tests/integration/test_checkout.py::test_complete_purchase** (Score: 9.6)
   - Indirect coverage: Imports src/payment/processor.py
   - Integration test: Full checkout flow
   - Reason: Validates payment changes with real workflow

6. **tests/test_models.py::test_user_model** (Score: 7.0)
   - Related file: src/models/user.py modified
   - Dependency: Auth and payment depend on user model
   - Reason: Foundation for changed functionality

### Priority 3: Supporting Tests

7. **tests/test_validators.py::test_email_validation** (Score: 4.0)
   - Indirect dependency: Used by auth module
   - Reason: Input validation for authentication

8. **tests/e2e/test_authentication_flow.py::test_full_auth_cycle** (Score: 3.9)
   - E2E coverage: Complete authentication flow
   - Reason: Comprehensive validation but slow to execute

[... remaining tests with lower scores ...]

## Quick Commands

Run high priority tests only (8 tests, ~2 min):
```bash
pytest tests/test_auth.py::test_login_success \
       tests/test_auth.py::test_login_failure \
       tests/test_payment.py::test_process_payment \
       tests/integration/test_user_flow.py::test_complete_registration \
       tests/integration/test_checkout.py::test_complete_purchase \
       tests/test_models.py::test_user_model \
       tests/test_validators.py::test_email_validation \
       tests/e2e/test_authentication_flow.py::test_full_auth_cycle

Run critical tests only (3 tests, ~30 sec):

bash

pytest tests/test_auth.py tests/test_payment.py::test_process_payment

Time Estimates

•Critical tests (3): ~30 seconds
•High priority tests (8): ~2 minutes
•All prioritized tests (23): ~5 minutes
•Full test suite (45): ~15 minutes

Recommendations

•Pre-commit: Run critical tests (score ≥ 15) before committing
•CI fast lane: Run high priority tests (score ≥ 9) in first stage
•Full validation: Run all tests in parallel after merge

code


### Step 5: Handle Special Cases

Adjust prioritization for specific scenarios.

**Time-Constrained Testing:**

```markdown
## 1-Minute Quick Check (Top 3 Critical Tests)

pytest tests/test_auth.py::test_login_success \
       tests/test_auth.py::test_login_failure \
       tests/test_payment.py::test_process_payment

These cover the most critical changed functionality.

Post-Refactoring:

markdown

## Post-Refactor Validation

Changed file: src/utils/helpers.py (used by 25 modules)

Priority:
1. All tests directly importing helpers.py (18 tests)
2. Integration tests using helper functions (8 tests)
3. Tests in dependent modules (25 tests)

Reason: Wide-reaching refactor requires comprehensive validation.

Flaky Test Handling:

markdown

## Note: Flaky Tests Detected

The following tests have high failure rates but low priority scores:
- tests/test_cache.py::test_concurrent_access (30% failure rate)
- tests/test_api.py::test_rate_limiting (25% failure rate)

Recommendation:
- Fix flaky tests before relying on prioritization
- Consider quarantining or mocking timing-dependent code

Step 6: Provide Execution Guidance

Offer practical commands and strategies.

For CI/CD Pipelines:

yaml

# .github/workflows/ci.yml example
jobs:
  quick-tests:
    name: Critical Tests (Fast Feedback)
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v2
      - name: Run critical tests
        run: |
          # Run tests with score ≥ 15 first
          pytest -v tests/test_auth.py tests/test_payment.py

  full-tests:
    name: Complete Test Suite
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    needs: quick-tests  # Only run if critical tests pass
    steps:
      - uses: actions/checkout@v2
      - name: Run all tests
        run: pytest

For Local Development:

bash

# Pre-commit hook (.git/hooks/pre-commit)
#!/bin/bash

# Get changed files
changed_files=$(git diff --cached --name-only)

# Run prioritized tests for changed files
if echo "$changed_files" | grep -q "src/auth/"; then
    pytest tests/test_auth.py || exit 1
fi

if echo "$changed_files" | grep -q "src/payment/"; then
    pytest tests/test_payment.py || exit 1
fi

For Selective Test Execution:

python

# pytest conftest.py - custom marker
import pytest

def pytest_collection_modifyitems(config, items):
    # Mark tests based on priority
    for item in items:
        if "test_auth" in item.nodeid or "test_payment" in item.nodeid:
            item.add_marker(pytest.mark.critical)

# Run only critical tests
# pytest -m critical

Prioritization Strategies

Strategy 1: Code Change Impact (Primary)

Focus on tests covering modified code:

•Direct coverage - Tests that explicitly test changed files
•Indirect coverage - Tests that import/use changed modules
•Dependency coverage - Tests for code that depends on changes

When to use:

•After code modifications
•Pre-commit validation
•Pull request testing

Strategy 2: Risk-Based Prioritization

Prioritize based on business and technical risk:

High Risk Areas:

•Authentication and authorization
•Payment processing
•Data integrity (database operations)
•Security-critical functions
•APIs and public interfaces

Medium Risk Areas:

•Business logic
•User workflows
•Data validation
•Email/notification systems

Low Risk Areas:

•UI cosmetics
•Logging
•Internal utilities
•Development tools

Strategy 3: Failure History

Prioritize tests that fail often:

python

# Example: Analyze test failure history from CI
# tests with >10% historical failure rate get boosted priority

Historical Failures:
- test_concurrent_access: 12 failures / 100 runs = 12% → Priority boost ×1.2
- test_database_connection: 5 failures / 100 runs = 5% → No boost

Strategy 4: Execution Time Optimization

Balance coverage with speed:

Fast-First Strategy:

•Run quick unit tests first (< 1 second each)
•Get rapid feedback on basic functionality
•Then run slower integration/E2E tests

Critical-First Strategy:

•Run most important tests first regardless of speed
•Better for catching major issues early
•May take longer for initial feedback

Hybrid Approach (Recommended):

•Run quick critical tests first (best of both worlds)
•Then slow critical tests
•Then fast non-critical tests
•Finally slow non-critical tests

Analyzing Different Project Types

Python (pytest)

Analyze test structure:

bash

# Find all test files
find . -name "test_*.py" -o -name "*_test.py"

# Get test functions
pytest --collect-only -q

# Analyze imports in tests
grep -r "^import\|^from" tests/

JavaScript/TypeScript (Jest)

Analyze test structure:

bash

# Find test files
find . -name "*.test.js" -o -name "*.spec.js"

# Get test list
npm test -- --listTests

# Analyze coverage
npm test -- --coverage --coverageReporters=json

Java (JUnit)

Analyze test structure:

bash

# Find test classes
find . -name "*Test.java"

# Run with verbose output
mvn test -X

# Get test reports
cat target/surefire-reports/*.xml

Best Practices

•Update prioritization regularly - Re-analyze when code structure changes significantly
•Combine with coverage tools - Use actual coverage data when available
•Consider test stability - Deprioritize flaky tests or fix them first
•Balance speed and coverage - Don't sacrifice important slow tests
•Communicate reasoning - Explain why tests are prioritized to team
•Adjust for context - Pre-commit vs. CI vs. nightly runs need different priorities
•Monitor effectiveness - Track if prioritized tests catch bugs earlier
•Keep it simple - Start with basic change-impact prioritization
•Document critical paths - Maintain list of high-priority areas
•Automate where possible - Integrate into CI/CD workflows

Example Scenarios

Scenario 1: Pre-Commit Validation

Context: Developer modified src/auth/login.py

Prioritization:

code

Top 3 tests to run (30 seconds):
1. tests/test_auth.py::test_login_success
2. tests/test_auth.py::test_login_failure
3. tests/test_auth.py::test_session_creation

Reasoning: Direct tests of changed functionality, fast execution.

Scenario 2: CI/CD Fast Lane

Context: Pull request with 15 files changed across 3 modules

Prioritization:

code

Stage 1 - Critical Tests (2 min):
- All auth tests (5 tests)
- All payment tests (4 tests)
- Core user model tests (3 tests)

Stage 2 - Integration Tests (5 min):
- User flow integration (8 tests)
- API integration (6 tests)

Stage 3 - Full Suite (parallel, 10 min):
- Remaining tests (120 tests)

Reasoning: Fast feedback on critical paths, comprehensive validation in parallel.

Scenario 3: Time-Constrained Testing

Context: 5 minutes before deadline, need to validate changes

Prioritization:

code

Must-run tests (2 min):
1. Tests directly covering changed files (8 tests)
2. Integration tests for critical paths (4 tests)

Nice-to-run tests (3 min):
3. Related unit tests (15 tests)

Skip for now:
- E2E tests (too slow)
- Unrelated tests (no impact)

Reasoning: Maximum validation coverage in minimum time.

Resources

•references/prioritization_algorithms.md - Detailed algorithms and formulas for calculating priority scores
•references/framework_guides.md - Framework-specific commands for test analysis (pytest, jest, junit, etc.)

Quick Reference

Scenario	Priority Strategy	Recommended Tests
Pre-commit	Code change impact	Direct tests of modified files
CI fast lane	Critical path + changes	High-priority + change-impacted
Time-limited	Highest scores only	Top 10-20 by priority score
Post-refactor	Wide coverage	All tests touching refactored code
Nightly build	Full comprehensive	All tests (no prioritization)