Curriculum Reviewer Skill
This skill comprehensively reviews educational materials for quality, pedagogical soundness, and consistency.
When to Use
Use this skill when the user:
- •Asks to review curriculum or lesson materials
- •Wants quality assurance on educational content
- •Requests feedback on teaching materials
- •Needs consistency check across multiple lessons
- •Wants to audit materials before publishing
- •Asks for improvement recommendations
What This Skill Does
- •
Identifies Scope of review:
- •Entire curriculum
- •Specific class or lesson
- •Specific material type (lessons, slides, assessments)
- •Particular aspects (pedagogy, formatting, alignment)
- •
Invokes Multiple Subagents for comprehensive review:
lesson-planner subagent reviews:
- •Learning objectives alignment
- •Pedagogical soundness
- •Timing and pacing realism
- •Differentiation strategies
- •Hands-on activity quality
- •Assessment alignment with objectives
slide-designer subagent reviews:
- •Slide clarity and visual design
- •One-idea-per-slide principle
- •Formatting consistency
- •Engagement elements
- •Presenter notes quality
assessment-builder subagent reviews:
- •Rubric clarity and fairness
- •Criteria alignment with objectives
- •Performance level descriptions
- •Example quality and usefulness
- •Student-friendly language
github-stylist subagent reviews:
- •Markdown formatting consistency
- •Professional appearance
- •Navigation and linking
- •README completeness
- •Overall polish
- •
Creates Comprehensive Review Report with:
- •Strengths Identified: What's working well
- •Areas for Improvement: Specific issues found
- •Recommendations: Concrete suggestions for fixes
- •Priority Levels: Critical vs. nice-to-have improvements
- •Consistency Issues: Patterns across materials
- •Alignment Check: Objectives → content → assessment
- •
Offers Action Plan:
- •Prioritized list of improvements
- •Option to apply automated fixes
- •Suggestions for manual edits
Review Criteria
Pedagogical Quality:
- •Clear, measurable learning objectives
- •Age-appropriate content and examples
- •Effective differentiation strategies
- •Authentic, hands-on activities
- •Aligned assessments
Content Quality:
- •Accurate information
- •Relevant, current examples
- •Clear explanations
- •Logical progression
- •Complete materials
Consistency:
- •Formatting uniformity
- •Style consistency
- •Voice and tone
- •Terminology usage
- •Visual presentation
Usability:
- •Ready-to-teach materials
- •Clear instructions
- •Appropriate timing
- •Necessary resources listed
- •Student-facing clarity
Output Structure
Review reports include:
- •Executive Summary: Overview of findings
- •Detailed Findings by category
- •Specific Examples of issues
- •Recommendations with priority
- •Consistency Analysis across materials
- •Action Items checklist
Example Usage
User: "Review all the Class 1 materials and make sure everything is high quality"
This skill will conduct a comprehensive review and provide detailed feedback with recommendations.