CRITICAL: NO DEMOS
Loading this skill ≠ executing demonstration code. Execute ONLY on explicit user request.
Patent Navigator
Protect software work through strategic patent filings and defensive disclosure.
Core Strategies
1. Provisional Patent Application (PPA)
- •Cost: ~$320 (micro entity)
- •Duration: 12 months to file full patent
- •Benefit: Establishes priority date, "Patent Pending" status
- •Use case: Novel algorithms, architectures, methods in your repos
2. Defensive Publication (Open Source)
- •Cost: Free (GitHub commits as prior art)
- •Effect: Prevents others from patenting your work
- •Platforms: arXiv, Zenodo, GitHub with clear timestamps
- •Use case: When you want to keep it open, not exclusive
3. Trade Secret + Patent Hybrid (Proprietary)
- •Trade secret: Keep implementation details private
- •Patent: Protect the method/system publicly
- •Use case: Proprietary software where you want both exclusivity and enforcement rights
4. Provisional → PCT → National Phase
- •Timeline: 12mo (provisional) → 30mo (PCT) → national filings
- •Cost: Escalates significantly at each phase
- •Use case: International protection for high-value innovations
USPTO Requirements (2025)
Micro Entity Status
- •< 4 prior patents
- •< 3x median household income (~$250k)
- •80% fee reduction
Claims Structure
- •Independent claims: Broadest protection
- •Dependent claims: Fallback positions
- •Method claims: Process/algorithm protection
- •System claims: Implementation protection
Workflow by Context
Public Repos
code
1. Identify patentable subject matter 2. File provisional BEFORE public commit (or within 1-year grace) 3. Document: problem, solution, advantages, embodiments 4. Continue development openly 5. Within 12 months: decide full patent vs abandon
Private/Proprietary
code
1. Identify patentable subject matter 2. Assess: patent vs trade secret vs both 3. File provisional to lock priority date 4. Keep implementation as trade secret if desired 5. Patent claims cover method/system, not code
Prior Art Search
Before filing, search:
- •USPTO Patent Full-Text (patents.google.com)
- •arXiv, Semantic Scholar (academic prior art)
- •GitHub code search (implementation prior art)
Key Dates (2025 USPTO Changes)
- •IPR tightening: Harder to challenge granted patents
- •Fee increases: File before rate changes
- •AI inventorship: Still requires human inventor
SF Bay Area IP Firms
- •Fenwick & West (tech-focused)
- •Wilson Sonsini (startup-friendly)
- •Knobbe Martens (patent prosecution)
- •Fish & Richardson (litigation strength)
References
- •35 U.S.C. § 102 (Novelty)
- •35 U.S.C. § 103 (Non-obviousness)
- •35 U.S.C. § 112 (Written description)
- •MPEP 2106 (Patent-eligible subject matter)