Implement Skill

Quick Ref: Execute single issue end-to-end. Output: code changes + commit + closed issue.

YOU MUST EXECUTE THIS WORKFLOW. Do not just describe it.

Execute a single issue from start to finish.

Requires: bd CLI (beads) for issue tracking. Falls back to plain descriptions if unavailable.

Execution Steps

Given /implement <issue-id-or-description>:

Step 0: Check Issue State (Resume Logic)

Before starting implementation, check if resuming:

•Check if issue is in_progress:

bash

bd show <issue-id> --json 2>/dev/null | jq -r '.status'

•
If status = in_progress AND assigned to you:
- •Look for checkpoint in issue notes: bd show <id> --json | jq -r '.notes'
- •Resume from last checkpoint step
- •Announce: "Resuming issue from Step N"
•
If status = in_progress AND assigned to another agent:
- •Report: "Issue claimed by <agent> - use bd update <id> --assignee self --force to override"
- •Do NOT proceed without explicit override
•
Store checkpoints after each major step:

bash

bd update <issue-id> --append-notes "CHECKPOINT: Step N completed at $(date -Iseconds)" 2>/dev/null

Step 0a: Check Ratchet Status (RPI Workflow)

Before implementation, verify prior workflow gates passed:

bash

# Check if ao CLI is available
if command -v ao &>/dev/null; then
  # Check if research and plan phases completed
  RATCHET_STATUS=$(ao ratchet status --json 2>/dev/null || echo '{}')
  RESEARCH_DONE=$(echo "$RATCHET_STATUS" | jq -r '.research.completed // false')
  PLAN_DONE=$(echo "$RATCHET_STATUS" | jq -r '.plan.completed // false')

  if [ "$RESEARCH_DONE" = "true" ] && [ "$PLAN_DONE" = "true" ]; then
    echo "Ratchet: Prior gates passed (research + plan complete)"
  elif [ "$RESEARCH_DONE" = "false" ] || [ "$PLAN_DONE" = "false" ]; then
    echo "WARNING: Prior gates not complete. Run /research and /plan first."
    echo "  Research: $RESEARCH_DONE"
    echo "  Plan: $PLAN_DONE"
    echo ""
    echo "Override with: ao ratchet skip <gate> --reason 'manual override'"
  fi

  # Get current spec path for reference
  SPEC_PATH=$(ao ratchet spec 2>/dev/null || echo "")
  if [ -n "$SPEC_PATH" ]; then
    echo "Ratchet: Current spec at $SPEC_PATH"
  fi
else
  echo "Ratchet: ao CLI not available - skipping gate check"
fi

Fallback: If ao is not available, proceed without ratchet checks. The skill continues normally.

Step 1: Get Issue Details

If beads issue ID provided (e.g., gt-123):

bash

bd show <issue-id> 2>/dev/null

If plain description provided: Use that as the task description.

If no argument: Check for ready work:

bash

bd ready 2>/dev/null | head -3

Step 2: Claim the Issue

bash

bd update <issue-id> --status in_progress 2>/dev/null

Step 3: Gather Context

USE THE TASK TOOL to explore relevant code:

code

Tool: Task
Parameters:
  subagent_type: "Explore"
  description: "Gather context for: <issue title>"
  prompt: |
    Find code relevant to: <issue description>

    1. Search for related files (Glob)
    2. Search for relevant keywords (Grep)
    3. Read key files to understand current implementation
    4. Identify where changes need to be made

    Return:
    - Files to modify (paths)
    - Current implementation summary
    - Suggested approach
    - Any risks or concerns

Step 4: Implement the Change

Based on the context gathered:

•Edit existing files using the Edit tool (preferred)
•Write new files only if necessary using the Write tool
•Follow existing patterns in the codebase
•Keep changes minimal - don't over-engineer

Step 5: Verify the Change

Success Criteria (all must pass):

• All existing tests pass (no new failures introduced)
• New code compiles/parses without errors
• No new linter warnings (if linter available)
• Change achieves the stated goal

Check for test files and run them:

bash

# Find tests
ls *test* tests/ test/ __tests__/ 2>/dev/null | head -5

# Run tests (adapt to project type)
# Python: pytest
# Go: go test ./...
# Node: npm test
# Rust: cargo test

If tests exist: All tests must pass. Any failure = verification failed.

If no tests exist: Manual verification required:

• Syntax check passes (file compiles/parses)
• Imports resolve correctly
• Can reproduce expected behavior manually
• Edge cases identified during implementation are handled

If verification fails: Do NOT proceed to Step 5a. Fix the issue first.

Step 5a: Verification Gate (MANDATORY)

THE IRON LAW: NO COMPLETION CLAIMS WITHOUT FRESH VERIFICATION EVIDENCE

Before reporting success, you MUST:

•IDENTIFY - What command proves this claim works?
•RUN - Execute the FULL command (fresh, not cached output)
•READ - Check full output AND exit code
•VERIFY - Does output actually confirm the claim?
•ONLY THEN - Make the completion claim

Forbidden phrases without fresh verification evidence:

•"should work", "probably fixed", "seems to be working"
•"Great!", "Perfect!", "Done!" (without output proof)
•"I just ran it" (must run it AGAIN, fresh)

Rationalization Table

Excuse	Reality
"Too simple to verify"	Simple code breaks. Verification takes 10 seconds.
"I just ran it"	Run it AGAIN. Fresh output only.
"Tests passed earlier"	Run them NOW. State changes.
"It's obvious it works"	Nothing is obvious. Evidence or silence.
"The edit looks correct"	Looking != working. Run the code.

Store checkpoint:

bash

bd update <issue-id> --append-notes "CHECKPOINT: Step 5a verification passed at $(date -Iseconds)" 2>/dev/null

Step 6: Commit the Change

If the change is complete and verified:

bash

git add <modified-files>
git commit -m "<descriptive message>

Implements: <issue-id>"

Step 7: Close the Issue

bash

bd update <issue-id> --status closed 2>/dev/null

Step 7a: Record Implementation in Ratchet Chain

After successful issue closure, record in ratchet:

bash

# Check if ao CLI is available
if command -v ao &>/dev/null; then
  # Get the commit hash as output artifact
  COMMIT_HASH=$(git rev-parse HEAD 2>/dev/null || echo "")
  CHANGED_FILES=$(git diff --name-only HEAD~1 2>/dev/null | tr '\n' ',' | sed 's/,$//')

  if [ -n "$COMMIT_HASH" ]; then
    # Record successful implementation
    ao ratchet record implement \
      --output "$COMMIT_HASH" \
      --files "$CHANGED_FILES" \
      --issue "<issue-id>" \
      2>&1 | tee -a .agents/ratchet.log

    if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
      echo "Ratchet: Implementation recorded (commit: ${COMMIT_HASH:0:8})"
    else
      echo "Ratchet: Failed to record - chain.jsonl may need repair"
    fi
  else
    echo "Ratchet: No commit found - skipping record"
  fi
else
  echo "Ratchet: ao CLI not available - implementation NOT recorded"
  echo "  Run manually: ao ratchet record implement --output <commit>"
fi

On failure/blocker: Record the blocker in ratchet:

bash

if command -v ao &>/dev/null; then
  ao ratchet record implement \
    --status blocked \
    --reason "<blocker description>" \
    2>/dev/null
fi

Fallback: If ao is not available, the issue is still closed via bd but won't be tracked in the ratchet chain. The skill continues normally.

Step 8: Report to User

Tell the user:

•What was changed (files modified)
•How it was verified (with actual command output)
•Issue status (closed)
•Any follow-up needed
•Ratchet status (implementation recorded or skipped)

Output completion marker:

code

<promise>DONE</promise>

If blocked or incomplete:

code

<promise>BLOCKED</promise>
Reason: <why blocked>

code

<promise>PARTIAL</promise>
Remaining: <what's left>

Key Rules

•Explore first - understand before changing
•Edit, don't rewrite - prefer Edit tool over Write tool
•Follow patterns - match existing code style
•Verify changes - run tests or sanity checks
•Commit with context - reference the issue ID
•Close the issue - update status when done

Without Beads

If bd CLI not available:

•Skip the claim/close status updates
•Use the description as the task
•Still commit with descriptive message
•Report completion to user

Level 2 Mode: Agent Mail Coordination

When: Agent Mail MCP tools are available (Level 2 Olympus or multi-agent coordination)

Level 2 mode enhances /implement with real-time coordination via MCP Agent Mail. This enables:

•Progress reporting to orchestrators (Mayor/Delphi)
•Help requests instead of blocking on user input
•Receiving guidance mid-execution
•Coordination with parallel workers (file reservations)

Level Detection

Detect the operational level at skill start:

bash

# Check for Agent Mail availability
AGENT_MAIL_AVAILABLE=false

# Method 1: Check if running inside /demigod context
if [ -n "$OLYMPUS_DEMIGOD_ID" ]; then
    AGENT_MAIL_AVAILABLE=true
fi

# Method 2: Check for explicit flag
# /implement <issue-id> --agent-mail --thread-id <id>

Level Semantics:

Level	Condition	Behavior
`level_1`	No Agent Mail	Current behavior (all steps above)
`level_2`	Agent Mail available	Enhanced coordination (steps below)

New Parameters

Parameter	Description	Default
`--agent-mail`	Enable Agent Mail coordination	`false`
`--thread-id`	Thread ID for message grouping (usually bead-id)	`<issue-id>`
`--demigod-id`	Agent identity for message sender	`demigod-<issue-id>`
`--orchestrator`	Who to send status messages to	`mayor@olympus`

Level 2 Execution Steps

When --agent-mail is enabled OR $OLYMPUS_DEMIGOD_ID is set:

L2 Step 0: Initialize Agent Mail Session

bash

# If not already registered (Demigod handles this), register self
# This is typically done by /demigod, but implement can work standalone
if [ -z "$OLYMPUS_DEMIGOD_ID" ]; then
    # Standalone Level 2 mode - need to register
    DEMIGOD_ID="${DEMIGOD_ID:-demigod-$(date +%s)}"
else
    DEMIGOD_ID="$OLYMPUS_DEMIGOD_ID"
fi

MCP Tool Call (if standalone):

code

Tool: mcp__mcp-agent-mail__register_agent
Parameters:
  project_key: "olympus"
  program: "implement-skill"
  model: "claude-opus-4-5-20250101"
  task_description: "Implementing <issue-id>"

L2 Step 1: Send ACCEPTED Message

After claiming the issue (Step 2 in base flow), notify the orchestrator:

MCP Tool Call:

code

Tool: mcp__mcp-agent-mail__send_message
Parameters:
  project_key: "olympus"
  sender_name: "<demigod-id>"
  to: "<orchestrator>"
  subject: "BEAD_ACCEPTED"
  body_md: |
    Accepted bead: <issue-id>
    Title: <issue-title>
    Starting implementation at: <timestamp>
  thread_id: "<issue-id>"
  ack_required: false

L2 Step 2: Check Inbox Before Major Steps

Before Steps 3, 4, 5 in base flow, check for incoming messages:

MCP Tool Call:

code

Tool: mcp__mcp-agent-mail__fetch_inbox
Parameters:
  project_key: "olympus"
  agent_name: "<demigod-id>"

Handle incoming messages:

Message Type	Action
`GUIDANCE`	Incorporate guidance into approach
`NUDGE`	Respond with progress update
`TERMINATE`	Exit gracefully (checkpoint work)

L2 Step 3: Send PROGRESS Messages Periodically

After each major step, send progress update:

Timing:

•After context gathering (Step 3)
•During implementation (Step 4) - every ~5 minutes of work
•After verification (Step 5)

MCP Tool Call:

code

Tool: mcp__mcp-agent-mail__send_message
Parameters:
  project_key: "olympus"
  sender_name: "<demigod-id>"
  to: "<orchestrator>"
  subject: "PROGRESS"
  body_md: |
    Bead: <issue-id>
    Step: <current-step>
    Status: <what's happening>
    Context usage: <approximate %>
    Files touched: <list>
  thread_id: "<issue-id>"
  ack_required: false

L2 Step 4: Send HELP_REQUEST When Stuck

Replace user prompts with Agent Mail help requests:

Instead of:

code

"I'm stuck on X. Should I proceed with Y or Z?"

Do this:

code

Tool: mcp__mcp-agent-mail__send_message
Parameters:
  project_key: "olympus"
  sender_name: "<demigod-id>"
  to: "chiron@olympus"  # Help goes to Chiron (coach)
  subject: "HELP_REQUEST"
  body_md: |
    Bead: <issue-id>
    Issue Type: STUCK | SPEC_UNCLEAR | BLOCKED | TECHNICAL

    ## Problem
    <describe the issue>

    ## What I Tried
    <approaches attempted>

    ## Files Touched
    - path/to/file.py
    - path/to/other.py

    ## Question
    <specific question needing answer>
  thread_id: "<issue-id>"
  ack_required: true

Then wait for HELP_RESPONSE:

code

# Poll inbox for response (max 2 minutes per help-response timeout)
for i in {1..24}; do
    # Check inbox
    # If HELP_RESPONSE found, continue with guidance
    # If timeout exceeded, proceed with best judgment or fail gracefully
    sleep 5
done

L2 Step 5: Report Completion via Agent Mail

After Step 7 (closing the issue), send completion message:

On Success:

code

Tool: mcp__mcp-agent-mail__send_message
Parameters:
  project_key: "olympus"
  sender_name: "<demigod-id>"
  to: "<orchestrator>"
  subject: "OFFERING_READY"
  body_md: |
    Bead: <issue-id>
    Status: DONE

    ## Changes
    - Commit: <commit-sha>
    - Files: <changed-files>

    ## Self-Validation
    - Tests: PASS/FAIL
    - Lint: PASS/FAIL
    - Build: PASS/FAIL

    ## Summary
    <brief description of what was implemented>
  thread_id: "<issue-id>"
  ack_required: true

On Failure:

code

Tool: mcp__mcp-agent-mail__send_message
Parameters:
  project_key: "olympus"
  sender_name: "<demigod-id>"
  to: "<orchestrator>"
  subject: "FAILED"
  body_md: |
    Bead: <issue-id>
    Status: FAILED

    ## Failure
    Type: TESTS_FAIL | BUILD_FAIL | SPEC_IMPOSSIBLE | ERROR
    Reason: <description>
    Internal Attempts: <count>

    ## Partial Progress
    - Commit: <partial-commit-sha if any>
    - Files: <files-modified>

    ## Recommendation
    <what needs to happen to unblock>
  thread_id: "<issue-id>"
  ack_required: false

Level 2 File Reservations

When running in Level 2 with parallel workers, claim files before editing:

Before Step 4 (implementation):

code

Tool: mcp__mcp-agent-mail__file_reservation_paths
Parameters:
  project_key: "olympus"
  agent_name: "<demigod-id>"
  paths:
    - "path/to/file1.py"
    - "path/to/file2.py"
  exclusive: false  # Advisory, not blocking

After Step 7 (completion):

code

Tool: mcp__mcp-agent-mail__release_file_reservations
Parameters:
  project_key: "olympus"
  agent_name: "<demigod-id>"

Level 2 Context Checkpoint

If context usage is high (>80%), send checkpoint before exiting:

code

Tool: mcp__mcp-agent-mail__send_message
Parameters:
  project_key: "olympus"
  sender_name: "<demigod-id>"
  to: "<orchestrator>"
  subject: "CHECKPOINT"
  body_md: |
    Bead: <issue-id>
    Reason: CONTEXT_HIGH

    ## Progress
    - Commit: <partial-commit-sha>
    - Description: <what's done, what remains>
    - Context usage: <pct>%

    ## Next Steps for Successor
    <guidance for replacement demigod>
  thread_id: "<issue-id>"
  ack_required: false

Level 2 Key Rules

•Always check inbox - Messages may contain critical guidance
•Send progress regularly - Orchestrator needs visibility
•Use HELP_REQUEST - Don't block on user, ask Chiron
•Reserve files - Prevents conflicts with parallel workers
•Checkpoint on context high - Preserve progress for successor
•Acknowledge important messages - Confirms receipt to sender

Level 2 vs Level 1 Summary

Behavior	Level 1	Level 2
Progress reporting	None	PROGRESS messages
When stuck	Ask user / proceed	HELP_REQUEST to Chiron
Completion	bd update only	OFFERING_READY + bd update
Failure	Report to user	FAILED message + report
File conflicts	Race conditions	Advisory reservations
Guidance	None	Check inbox for GUIDANCE

Integration with /demigod

When /implement is called from /demigod skill:

•Environment variables are pre-set ($OLYMPUS_DEMIGOD_ID, etc.)
•Agent registration already done
•File reservations already claimed
•Just focus on implementation + progress + completion messages

When /implement is called standalone with --agent-mail:

•Must register self
•Must claim own files
•Full Level 2 behavior