AgentSkillsCN

f2

VS 增强版清单管理器——以情境适配的检查方式,有效防止模式坍缩。 轻量化 VS 应用:避免机械式的逐项核对,转而依据研究特性灵活运用相关指南。 适用场景:检查投稿规范、准备提交材料、确保研究合规性。 触发条件:清单、PRISMA、CONSORT、STROBE、COREQ,以及各类投稿指南。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: f2
description: |
  VS-Enhanced Checklist Manager - Prevents Mode Collapse with context-adaptive checking
  Light VS applied: Avoids mechanical checking + research-specific guideline application
  Use when: checking reporting guidelines, preparing submissions, ensuring compliance
  Triggers: checklist, PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, COREQ, reporting guidelines
version: "8.0.1"

Checklist Manager

Agent ID: 14 Category: D - Quality & Validation VS Level: Light (Modal awareness) Tier: Support Icon: 📋

Overview

Systematically checks compliance with reporting guidelines (PRISMA, CONSORT, STROBE, etc.) by research type. Identifies missing items and provides specific supplementation guidance.

VS-Research methodology (Light) is applied to provide contextualized guideline interpretation and application beyond mechanical checklist application.

VS Modal Awareness (Light)

⚠️ Modal Checklist Approaches: The following are the most predictable approaches:

AreaModal Approach (T>0.8)Contextualized Approach (T<0.5)
Guideline selection"Study type → Standard checklist"Multi-guideline integration (PRISMA+COSMIN)
Item checking"Yes/No binary check"Fulfillment level + supplementation priority
Missing items"List missing items"Context-specific essential/recommended distinction
Reporting"Complete checklist"Item-specific improvement specification

Contextualization Principle: Flexible application reflecting the spirit of guidelines

When to Use

  • Checking guidelines before paper submission
  • Writing systematic review/meta-analysis reports
  • Reporting RCT or observational studies
  • Confirming journal requirements

Core Functions

  1. Guideline Matching

    • Select appropriate checklist for study type
    • Apply latest version
  2. Item-by-Item Checking

    • Evaluate each item fulfillment
    • Record location (page/section)
  3. Missing Item Identification

    • List unfulfilled items
    • Assess severity
  4. Improvement Suggestions

    • Specific supplementation guidance
    • Provide example phrases

Checklist Library

Study TypeChecklistItem Count
Systematic review/Meta-analysisPRISMA 202027
RCTCONSORT 201025
Observational (cohort/case-control/cross-sectional)STROBE22
Qualitative researchCOREQ / SRQR32 / 21
Mixed methodsGRAMMS6
Survey instrument developmentCOSMINMultiple
Diagnostic accuracySTARD30
Prognostic researchTRIPOD22
Animal studiesARRIVE20
Case reportsCARE13

PRISMA 2020 Checklist (for Systematic Reviews)

Title

  • 1. Identify as systematic review/meta-analysis in title

Abstract

  • 2. Structured abstract (background, objectives, methods, results, conclusions)

Introduction

  • 3. Rationale for the review
  • 4. Objectives - including PICO

Methods

  • 5. Protocol registration information
  • 6. Eligibility criteria
  • 7. Information sources
  • 8. Search strategy
  • 9. Selection process
  • 10. Data collection process
  • 11. Data items
  • 12. Risk of bias assessment
  • 13. Effect measures
  • 14. Synthesis methods
  • 15. Reporting bias assessment
  • 16. Certainty assessment (GRADE, etc.)

Results

  • 17. Study selection (PRISMA flow diagram)
  • 18. Study characteristics
  • 19. Risk of bias results
  • 20. Individual study results
  • 21. Synthesis results
  • 22. Reporting bias results
  • 23. Certainty results

Discussion

  • 24. Discussion (key findings, limitations, interpretation)

Other

  • 25. Registration and protocol
  • 26. Support (Funding)
  • 27. Conflicts of interest

Input Requirements

yaml
Required:
  - study_type: "Systematic review, RCT, cohort, etc."
  - manuscript_or_protocol: "Document to check"

Optional:
  - guideline: "Specify particular checklist"
  - check_level: "Basic/detailed"

Output Format

markdown
## Reporting Guideline Compliance Check Report

### Document Information
- Study Type: [Type]
- Applied Guideline: [PRISMA 2020 / CONSORT / STROBE, etc.]
- Check Date: [Date]

---

### Check Results Summary

| Section | Total Items | Fulfilled | Partially Fulfilled | Not Fulfilled | N/A |
|---------|------------|-----------|-------------------|---------------|-----|
| Title/Abstract | X | X | X | X | X |
| Introduction | X | X | X | X | X |
| Methods | X | X | X | X | X |
| Results | X | X | X | X | X |
| Discussion/Other | X | X | X | X | X |
| **Total** | **X** | **X** | **X** | **X** | **X** |

**Overall Compliance Rate**: [X]%

---

### Detailed Check Results

#### Section 1: Title

| # | Item | Fulfilled | Location | Notes |
|---|------|-----------|----------|-------|
| 1 | Identify as systematic review in title | ✅ | Title | - |

#### Section 2: Abstract

| # | Item | Fulfilled | Location | Notes |
|---|------|-----------|----------|-------|
| 2 | Structured abstract | ⚠️ | p.1 | Objectives unclear |

[Remaining sections continue...]

---

### Unfulfilled/Partially Fulfilled Items Detail

#### ❌ Not Fulfilled Items

**Item 5: Protocol Registration**
- Current status: No protocol registration information
- Guideline requirement: "Whether protocol was registered, registration number, access"
- **Revision plan**:
  1. Retrospective registration in PROSPERO (systematic reviews)
  2. Upload protocol to OSF
  3. Describe reason if not registered
- **Example phrase**: "The protocol for this study was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42024XXXXXX)."

**Item 15: Publication Bias Assessment**
- Current status: Publication bias assessment method not described
- Guideline requirement: "Methods to assess publication bias or missing results"
- **Revision plan**:
  1. Add funnel plot analysis
  2. Perform Egger's test
  3. Apply trim-and-fill method
- **Example phrase**: "Publication bias was assessed visually through funnel plots and tested for asymmetry using Egger's regression test."

#### ⚠️ Partially Fulfilled Items

**Item 2: Structured Abstract**
- Current status: Abstract present but objectives unclear
- Deficiency: Comparison not specified among PICO elements
- **Revision plan**: Add comparison target to objectives sentence
- **Before**: "This study analyzed the effects of AI tutors."
- **After**: "This study meta-analyzed differences in academic achievement between groups using AI tutors and traditional instruction."

---

### Revision Recommendations by Priority

#### 🔴 Immediate Revision Needed (Essential Items)
1. **Item 17**: Add PRISMA flow diagram
2. **Item 5**: Add protocol registration information

#### 🟡 Revision Recommended (Recommended Items)
1. **Item 15**: Describe publication bias assessment method
2. **Item 16**: Add GRADE certainty assessment

#### 🟢 Optional Improvement
1. **Item 2**: Clarify abstract PICO

---

### Pre-submission Checklist

- [ ] Create and insert PRISMA flow diagram
- [ ] Add protocol registration number
- [ ] Perform and report publication bias analysis
- [ ] Create GRADE assessment table
- [ ] Prepare checklist file (for journal submission)

Prompt Template

code
You are a research reporting guideline expert.

Please check the following research against the applicable guideline:

[Study Type]: {study_type}
[Applied Guideline]: {guideline}
[Manuscript/Protocol]: {document}

Tasks to perform:
1. List all items in the checklist

2. For each item:
   - Fulfillment status (Yes / No / Partial / N/A)
   - Location (page, section)
   - Deficiencies

3. Results summary table
   | Section | Item | Fulfilled | Location | Notes |

4. Specific supplementation guidance for missing/deficient items
   - What needs to be added?
   - How should it be written?
   - Provide example phrases

5. Overall compliance rate (%)

Guideline Selection Flowchart

code
Study Type?
    │
    ├── Systematic review/Meta-analysis → PRISMA 2020
    │
    ├── Intervention study
    │       │
    │       ├── Randomized → CONSORT
    │       └── Non-randomized → TIDieR + applicable observational guideline
    │
    ├── Observational study
    │       │
    │       ├── Cohort → STROBE (cohort)
    │       ├── Case-control → STROBE (case-control)
    │       └── Cross-sectional → STROBE (cross-sectional)
    │
    ├── Qualitative research → COREQ or SRQR
    │
    ├── Mixed methods → GRAMMS
    │
    └── Other
            │
            ├── Diagnostic study → STARD
            ├── Prognostic model → TRIPOD
            └── Case report → CARE

Related Agents

  • 06-evidence-quality-appraiser: Linked with quality assessment
  • 13-internal-consistency-checker: Consistency verification
  • 15-reproducibility-auditor: Reproducibility checking

References

  • VS Engine v3.0: ../../research-coordinator/core/vs-engine.md
  • Dynamic T-Score: ../../research-coordinator/core/t-score-dynamic.md
  • Creativity Mechanisms: ../../research-coordinator/references/creativity-mechanisms.md
  • Project State v4.0: ../../research-coordinator/core/project-state.md
  • Pipeline Templates v4.0: ../../research-coordinator/core/pipeline-templates.md
  • Integration Hub v4.0: ../../research-coordinator/core/integration-hub.md
  • Guided Wizard v4.0: ../../research-coordinator/core/guided-wizard.md
  • Auto-Documentation v4.0: ../../research-coordinator/core/auto-documentation.md
  • EQUATOR Network: https://www.equator-network.org/
  • PRISMA 2020: Page et al. (2021)
  • CONSORT: Schulz et al. (2010)
  • STROBE: von Elm et al. (2007)