Required:
  - document: "Full research paper/report or specific section"

Optional:
  - focus_area: "Specific area to prioritize"
  - style_guide: "APA 7, AMA, etc."

## Internal Consistency Check Report

### Document Information
- Title: [Paper title]
- Check date: [Date]
- Check scope: [Full/specific section]

---

### 1. Logic Flow Verification

#### Research Question → Hypothesis Connection
| Research Question | Corresponding Hypothesis | Match |
|------------------|-------------------------|-------|
| RQ1: [Question] | H1: [Hypothesis] | ✅/⚠️/❌ |
| RQ2: [Question] | H2: [Hypothesis] | ✅/⚠️/❌ |

**Inconsistencies Found**: [Yes/No]
- Location: [Page/section]
- Content: [Inconsistency description]
- Recommendation: [Revision suggestion]

#### Hypothesis → Method Connection
| Hypothesis | Measurement/Analysis Method | Match |
|------------|---------------------------|-------|
| H1 | [Method] | ✅/⚠️/❌ |

#### Hypothesis → Results Connection
| Hypothesis | Results Reported | Match |
|------------|------------------|-------|
| H1 | [Results summary] | ✅/⚠️/❌ |

**Unreported Hypotheses**: [Yes/No]

---

### 2. Numerical Consistency Check

#### Sample Size
| Location | Reported N | Match |
|----------|-----------|-------|
| Abstract | N = XXX | - (baseline) |
| Methods | N = XXX | ✅/❌ |
| Results table | N = XXX | ✅/❌ |
| Text | N = XXX | ✅/❌ |

**Inconsistencies Found**:
- [ ] Location: [Page X, Line Y]
- [ ] Inconsistency: [N = 100 vs N = 98]
- [ ] Estimated cause: [Excluded missing data not explained]

#### Statistical Verification
| Reported Statistic | Recalculated Result | Match |
|-------------------|---------------------|-------|
| t(98) = 2.45 | Recalc: t = 2.44 | ✅ |
| p = .016 | Recalc: p = .016 | ✅ |
| d = 0.49 | Recalc: d = 0.48 | ⚠️ (rounding) |

#### Percentage/Sum Verification
| Table/Location | Sum | Expected | Match |
|----------------|-----|----------|-------|
| Table 1 Gender | 100.1% | 100% | ⚠️ |
| Table 2 Groups | 150 | 150 | ✅ |

---

### 3. Terminology Consistency Check

#### Inconsistent Terms Found
| Concept | Terms Used | Recommendation |
|---------|-----------|----------------|
| [Concept1] | "learner", "student", "participant" | Unify as "learner" |
| [Concept2] | "AI tutor", "artificial intelligence teacher" | Unify as "AI tutor" |

#### Abbreviation Check
| Abbreviation | First Definition Location | Defined |
|--------------|-------------------------|---------|
| AI | p. 3 | ✅ |
| LMS | p. 7 | ❌ (not defined) |

---

### 4. Reference Accuracy Check

#### Citation-Bibliography Cross-Check
**Citations in text only** (not in bibliography):
- Kim (2023) - p. 5
- Lee et al. (2024) - p. 12

**Bibliography entries only** (not cited in text):
- Park, J. (2022). Title...

#### Table/Figure References
| Item | First Citation in Text | Actual Location | Order |
|------|----------------------|----------------|-------|
| Table 1 | p. 8 | p. 10 | ✅ |
| Figure 1 | p. 12 | p. 11 | ⚠️ (figure before citation) |

---

### 5. Statistical Reporting Format Check

#### APA Format Compliance
| Item | Format | Compliant | Location |
|------|--------|-----------|----------|
| t-test | t(df) = X.XX, p = .XXX | ✅ | p. 10 |
| ANOVA | F(df1, df2) = X.XX, p = .XXX | ❌ (df missing) | p. 12 |
| Correlation | r = .XX, p = .XXX | ⚠️ (N missing) | p. 14 |

#### Effect Size Reporting
| Analysis | Effect Size Reported | Interpretation Included |
|----------|---------------------|------------------------|
| t-test 1 | d = 0.49 | ✅ |
| t-test 2 | None | ❌ |
| ANOVA | η² = .12 | ✅ |

---

### 6. Overall Evaluation

#### Check Results Summary
| Area | Critical | Minor | Good |
|------|----------|-------|------|
| Logical flow | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Numerical consistency | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Terminology consistency | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Reference accuracy | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Statistical reporting | 1 | 2 | 4 |

**Overall Consistency Score**: [85]/100

#### Priority Revisions Needed (Critical)
1. [Item 1]: [Location], [Content], [Recommendation]
2. [Item 2]: [Location], [Content], [Recommendation]

#### Recommended Revisions (Minor)
1. [Item 1]: [Content]
2. [Item 2]: [Content]

You are an academic editing and quality control expert.

Please check the internal consistency of the following research document:

[Document]: {document}

Tasks to perform:
1. Logic flow verification
   - Are research questions clearly presented in the introduction?
   - Do hypotheses match research questions?
   - Are methods appropriate for testing hypotheses?
   - Do results correspond to hypotheses?
   - Are conclusions based on results?

2. Numerical consistency check
   - Table N matches text N
   - Same values match between figures and tables
   - Percentage sum verification
   - Statistical recalculation feasibility

3. Terminology consistency
   - Consistent naming of same concept
   - Abbreviation definition at first appearance
   - Variable name consistency

4. Reference accuracy
   - Text citations match bibliography
   - Table/figure number reference accuracy
   - Page/section reference accuracy

5. Statistical reporting check
   - APA format compliance
   - Degrees of freedom, F-value, t-value, p-value consistency
   - Effect size reporting

Output:
- List of inconsistent items (location, content, severity)
- Revision suggestions
- Overall consistency score (/100)