AgentSkillsCN

protocol-structural

针对需要结构性大修的创意作品，采用架构诊断流程（P2）。可通过“结构”、“架构”、“幕分解”、“结构上哪里出了问题？”、“宏观层面的问题”、“改写规划”等短语触发。产出覆盖报告、结构分析以及诊断报告。以戏剧理论家和叙事学家为主要角色。预计每 100 页剧本耗时 2–3 小时。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: protocol-structural
description: Architecture diagnosis protocol (P2) for creative work requiring structural overhaul. Triggers on "structure", "architecture", "act breakdown", "what's broken structurally", "macro-level problems", "rewrite planning". Produces Coverage Report, Structural Analysis, and Diagnostic Report. Uses DRAMATURGIST and NARRATOLOGIST as primary roles. Estimated time 2-3 hours per 100-page script.

P2 — STRUCTURAL Protocol

Architecture diagnosis for active revision of creative work.

Configuration

yaml
ROLES_ACTIVE:
  PRIMARY:   [DRAMATURGIST, NARRATOLOGIST]
  SECONDARY: [FIRST-READER, CINEPHILE]
  INACTIVE:  [AESTHETE, ART_HIST, RHETORICIAN, PRODUCER, ACADEMIC]

DOCUMENTS:
  GENERATE:  [Coverage Report, Structural Analysis, Diagnostic Report]
  EXCLUDE:   [Beat Map (full), Character Atlas, Thematic Architecture,
              Theoretical Correspondence, Revision Roadmap]

DEPTH: Medium
INGESTION: Two reads (engagement + structural)

Ingestion Protocol

Read 1: Engagement

  • •Note where attention holds/flags
  • •Capture [FIRST-READER] reactions

Read 2: Structural

  • •Identify act breaks (even if unconventional)
  • •Mark turning points and structural nodes
  • •Map temporal structure and time span

Diagnostic Tests (Required)

Apply these formal tests and document results:

Test 1: South Park But/Therefore

code
For each act transition:
  IF connection = "AND THEN" → FLAG: Episodic structure
  IF connection = "BUT" or "THEREFORE" → PASS: Causal binding present

Test 2: McKee Progressive Complications

code
For each act:
  complications[n] > complications[n-1]? 
  IF false → FLAG: Stakes not escalating

Test 3: Turning Point Placement

NodeExpected PositionTolerance
Inciting Incident10-15%±5%
End Act I20-25%±5%
Midpoint45-55%±5%
End Act II75-80%±5%
Climax85-95%±5%

Test 4: Act Proportion

code
Standard: 25% / 50% / 25%
Acceptable variance: ±10%

Output: Structural Diagram

Generate ASCII architecture visualization:

code
ACT I          │ ACT II                      │ ACT III
               │                             │
    ╱╲         │         ╱╲                  │    ╱╲
   ╱  ╲        │        ╱  ╲                 │   ╱  ╲
  ╱    ╲       │       ╱    ╲    ╱╲          │  ╱    ╲
 ╱      ╲      │      ╱      ╲  ╱  ╲         │ ╱      ╲
╱        ╲     │     ╱        ╲╱    ╲        │╱        ╲
──────────────►│◄────────────────────────────►│─────────►
Hook    Inciting│     Midpoint    Crisis      │ Climax  Resolution
        Incident│                             │

Comparable Works Section

[CINEPHILE] must provide 2-3 structural comparisons:

  • •Similar structural approach that succeeds
  • •Similar structural approach that fails
  • •Alternative structural model to consider

Escalation Triggers

Upgrade to P3-CRAFT if:

  • • Character arcs are the primary structural issue
  • • Dialogue problems compound structural weakness
  • • Writer needs revision roadmap, not just diagnosis