P4 — SCHOLARLY Protocol
Academic-grade theoretical analysis for scholarly purposes.
Configuration
yaml
ROLES_ACTIVE:
PRIMARY: [ACADEMIC, NARRATOLOGIST, ART_HIST]
SECONDARY: [RHETORICIAN, CINEPHILE]
INACTIVE: [FIRST-READER, DRAMATURGIST, PRODUCER, AESTHETE]
DOCUMENTS:
GENERATE: [Structural Analysis, Thematic Architecture,
Theoretical Correspondence, Diagnostic Report,
Comparative Analysis (supplement)]
EXCLUDE: [Coverage Report, Beat Map, Character Atlas,
Revision Roadmap]
DEPTH: High (theoretical)
INGESTION: Multiple reads (structural + thematic + theoretical)
Key Differences from Craft Protocols
- •No revision guidance — analysis, not prescription
- •Extended theoretical correspondence section
- •Citation-ready observations
- •Historical lineage mapping
- •Framework application demonstration
Ingestion Protocol
Read 1: Structural
- •Map architecture without judgment
- •Note unconventional structures
Read 2: Thematic
- •Identify controlling idea
- •Track motif patterns
- •Map symbolic systems
Read 3: Theoretical
- •Apply frameworks systematically
- •Document correspondences
- •Note departures from theory
Framework Application Depth
Apply all relevant frameworks with full documentation:
| Framework | Application Level |
|---|---|
| Aristotle | Full Poetics mapping (unity, reversal, recognition) |
| McKee | Value charge + gap analysis |
| Bharata Muni | Rasa identification + bhava mapping |
| Attention Mechanics | Engagement mode analysis |
| Medium-specific | As warranted by work type |
Core Deliverables
1. Theoretical Correspondence Table (Required)
markdown
## Theoretical Correspondence ### [FRAMEWORK 1] Application | Element | Framework Principle | Implementation | Assessment | |---------|---------------------|----------------|------------| | [X] | [Principle] | [How work does/doesn't] | ✓/✗ | ### [FRAMEWORK 2] Application [Same format] ### Cross-Framework Synthesis [How multiple frameworks illuminate different aspects]
2. Thematic Architecture (Required)
markdown
## Thematic Architecture ### Controlling Idea **Thesis**: [1-sentence argument] **Antithesis**: [Counter-argument represented in work] **Synthesis**: [Resolution, if any] ### Thematic Layers | Layer | Theme | Evidence | Prominence | |-------|-------|----------|------------| | Primary | [X] | pp. X, Y, Z | Central | | Secondary | [X] | pp. X, Y | Supporting | ### Motif Tracking | Motif | First Appearance | Recurrences | Transformation | |-------|------------------|-------------|----------------| | [X] | p. X | pp. Y, Z | [How it evolves] |
3. Historical Lineage (Required)
[ART_HIST] provides:
markdown
## Historical Lineage ### Antecedents - [Work/Movement] (Year) — [Specific influence] ### Contemporaneous Context - [How work relates to current moment] ### Descendant Influence (if applicable) - [How work has influenced subsequent works]
4. Citation-Ready Observations
Format observations for direct quotation in academic writing:
markdown
## Key Observations (Citation-Ready) > "[Direct observation with page reference]" (p. X) **Analysis**: [Interpretive commentary suitable for academic prose]
Academic Standards
- •All claims supported by textual evidence
- •Page/line references for every observation
- •Theoretical terminology used precisely
- •Counter-arguments acknowledged
- •Scope of claims appropriately limited