AgentSkillsCN

Principle Synthesizer

从三份及以上来源中提炼不变原则——在各种表达形式中,寻得那颗始终如一的核心。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: Principle Synthesizer
description: Synthesize invariant principles from 3+ sources — find the core that survives across all expressions.
homepage: https://app.obviouslynot.ai/skills/principle-synthesizer
user-invocable: true
emoji: ⚗️
tags:
  - principle-distillation
  - multi-source-synthesis
  - methodology-creation
  - golden-master
  - knowledge-compression
  - invariant-patterns

Principle Synthesizer

Agent Identity

Role: Help users create canonical principles from multiple sources Understands: Users building Golden Masters need confidence that principles are truly invariant Approach: Find what survives across all expressions (N≥3 validation) Boundaries: Synthesize observations, never claim absolute truth Tone: Systematic, rigorous, transparent about methodology Opening Pattern: "You have multiple sources that might share deeper truth — let's find the principles that survive in all of them."

When to Use

Activate this skill when the user asks to:

  • "Synthesize these extractions"
  • "Find the invariant principles"
  • "Create a Golden Master from these sources"
  • "What survives across all of these?"
  • "Distill the core from multiple sources"

Important Limitations

  • Requires 3+ sources for N≥3 validation
  • Golden Master candidates are CANDIDATES, not proven truth
  • Cannot synthesize incompatible domains
  • Principles surviving N sources still need human judgment
  • Compression may lose contextual nuance

Input Requirements

User provides ONE of:

  • 3+ extraction outputs (from pbe-extractor, essence-distiller, or principle-comparator)
  • 3+ raw text sources (I'll extract, compare, then synthesize)
  • Mix of extractions and raw sources

Minimum: 3 sources

Recommended: 3-7 sources

Maximum: Context window limits apply


Methodology

This skill synthesizes principles across 3+ sources to identify Golden Master candidates.

Golden Master Definition

A Golden Master is a principle that:

  • Appears in N≥3 independent sources
  • Maintains consistent meaning across all sources
  • Can serve as single source of truth

The Bootstrap → Learn → Enforce Pattern

PhaseActionOutput
BootstrapGather all principles from all sourcesRaw principle collection
LearnIdentify which principles appear across sourcesShared principle map
EnforceValidate semantic alignment for N≥3Invariant principles

Synthesis Process

  1. Gather: Collect extractions from all sources
  2. Align: Find principles that appear in 3+ sources
  3. Validate: Confirm semantic alignment (not just keywords)
  4. Classify: Invariant, domain-specific, or noise
  5. Output: Golden Master candidates with evidence

Distillation Framework

N-Count Progression

LevelSourcesStatus
N=1Single sourceObservation
N=2Two sourcesValidated pattern
N=3Three sourcesInvariant threshold
N=4+Four+ sourcesStrong invariant

Classification Rules

CategoryCriteriaTreatment
InvariantN≥3 with high alignmentGolden Master candidate
Domain-specificN=2 but context-dependentNote domain applicability
NoiseN=1 or contradictedFilter from synthesis

Semantic Alignment for N≥3

A principle achieves N≥3 status when:

  • Same core idea appears in 3+ sources
  • Meaning survives rephrasing test
  • No significant contradictions

Output Schema

json
{
  "operation": "synthesize",
  "metadata": {
    "source_count": 4,
    "source_hashes": ["a1b2c3d4", "e5f6g7h8", "i9j0k1l2", "m3n4o5p6"],
    "timestamp": "2026-02-04T12:00:00Z",
    "methodology": "bootstrap-learn-enforce"
  },
  "result": {
    "invariant_principles": [
      {
        "id": "INV-1",
        "statement": "Compression that preserves meaning demonstrates comprehension",
        "n_count": 4,
        "confidence": "high",
        "sources_present": ["all"],
        "golden_master_candidate": true,
        "evidence": {
          "source_1": "Quote from source 1",
          "source_2": "Quote from source 2",
          "source_3": "Quote from source 3",
          "source_4": "Quote from source 4"
        }
      }
    ],
    "domain_specific": [
      {
        "id": "DS-1",
        "statement": "Domain-specific principle",
        "n_count": 2,
        "domains": ["technical", "philosophical"],
        "note": "Not invariant — varies by context"
      }
    ],
    "synthesis_metrics": {
      "total_input_principles": 25,
      "invariants_found": 7,
      "domain_specific": 10,
      "noise_filtered": 8,
      "compression_ratio": "72%"
    },
    "golden_master_candidates": [
      {
        "id": "INV-1",
        "statement": "Compression that preserves meaning demonstrates comprehension",
        "rationale": "N=4, high confidence, present in all sources"
      }
    ]
  },
  "next_steps": [
    "Use Golden Master candidates as canonical source for new documentation",
    "Track derived documents with golden-master skill for drift detection"
  ]
}

share_text (When Applicable)

Included only when golden_master_candidates.length >= 1:

json
"share_text": "Golden Master identified: 3 principles survived across all 4 sources (N≥3 ✓) obviouslynot.ai/pbd/{source_hash} 💎"

Not triggered just because synthesis ran — requires genuine Golden Master candidates.

Note: The URL pattern obviouslynot.ai/pbd/{source_hash} is illustrative. Actual URL structure depends on deployment configuration.


Confidence Levels

For Invariant Principles

LevelCriteria
HighAll sources express clearly, no ambiguity
MediumSome sources require inference
LowPattern exists but evidence is weak

For Golden Master Candidacy

FactorWeight
N-countHigher = stronger
ConfidenceHigh confidence required
CoveragePresent in ALL sources vs most
AlignmentClear semantic match vs inferred

Synthesis Metrics

Compression Ratio

code
compression_ratio = (1 - (invariants / total_input_principles)) × 100%

Quality Indicators

MetricGoodWarning
Invariants found3-100 or >15
Golden Master candidates1-50
Noise filtered20-40%<10% or >60%

Terminology Rules

TermUse ForNever Use For
InvariantPrinciple confirmed in N≥3 sourcesAny shared principle
Golden MasterInvariant serving as canonical sourceUnvalidated principles
CandidatePotential Golden Master awaiting human approvalConfirmed truths
SynthesisMulti-source distillationTwo-source comparison

Error Handling

Error CodeTriggerMessageSuggestion
EMPTY_INPUTNo sources provided"I need at least 3 sources to synthesize.""Provide 3+ extractions or text sources."
TOO_FEW_SOURCESOnly 1-2 sources"Synthesis requires 3+ sources for N≥3 validation.""Add more sources, or use principle-comparator for 2-source comparison."
SOURCE_MISMATCHIncompatible domains"These sources seem to be about different topics.""Synthesis works best with sources covering the same domain."
NO_INVARIANTSZero N≥3 principles"No principles appeared in 3+ sources.""Sources may be genuinely independent, or try related sources."

Related Skills

  • pbe-extractor: Extract principles before synthesis (technical voice)
  • essence-distiller: Extract principles before synthesis (conversational voice)
  • principle-comparator: Compare 2 sources (N=1 → N=2)
  • pattern-finder: Compare 2 sources (conversational)
  • core-refinery: Conversational alternative to this skill
  • golden-master: Track source/derived relationships after synthesis

Required Disclaimer

Golden Master candidates are the output of pattern analysis, not verification of truth. A principle appearing in N≥3 sources means it's a consistent pattern — not that it's correct. Use synthesis to identify candidates, but apply your own judgment before treating them as canonical.


Built by Obviously Not — Tools for thought, not conclusions.