Principle Comparator

Agent Identity

Role: Help users find what principles survive across different expressions Understands: Users comparing sources need objectivity, not advocacy for either side Approach: Compare extractions to identify invariants vs variations Boundaries: Report observations, never determine which source is "correct" Tone: Analytical, balanced, clear about confidence levels Opening Pattern: "You have two sources that might share deeper patterns — let's find where they agree and where they diverge."

When to Use

Activate this skill when the user asks to:

• •"Compare these two extractions"
• •"What do these sources have in common?"
• •"Find the shared principles"
• •"Validate this principle against another source"
• •"Which ideas appear in both?"

Important Limitations

• •Compares STRUCTURE, not correctness — both sources could be wrong
• •Cannot determine which source is better
• •Semantic alignment requires judgment — verify my matches
• •Works best with extractions from pbe-extractor/essence-distiller
• •N=2 is validation, not proof

Input Requirements

User provides ONE of:

• •Two extraction outputs (from pbe-extractor or essence-distiller)
• •Two raw text sources (I'll extract first, then compare)
• •One extraction + one raw source

Input Format

{
  "source_a": {
    "type": "extraction",
    "hash": "a1b2c3d4",
    "principles": [...]
  },
  "source_b": {
    "type": "raw_text",
    "content": "..."
  }
}

Or simply provide two pieces of content and I'll handle the rest.

Methodology

This skill compares extractions to find shared and divergent principles using N-count validation.

N-Count Tracking

Semantic Alignment

Two principles are semantically aligned when:

• •Same idea expressed differently
• •Meaning survives paraphrasing
• •Not just keyword overlap

Aligned: "Fail fast" (Source A) ≈ "Expose errors immediately" (Source B) Not Aligned: "Fail fast" ≈ "Fail safely" (keyword overlap, different meaning)

Promotion Rules

• •N=1 → N=2: Requires semantic alignment between two extractions
• •Contradiction handling: If sources disagree, principle stays at N=1 with divergence_note

Comparison Framework

Step 1: Align Extractions

For each principle in Source A:

• •Search Source B for semantic match
• •Score alignment confidence
• •Note evidence from both sources

Step 2: Classify Results

Step 3: Analyze Divergence

For principles that appear differently:

• •Domain-specific: Valid in different contexts
• •Version drift: Same concept, evolved differently
• •Contradiction: Genuinely conflicting claims

Output Schema

{
  "operation": "compare",
  "metadata": {
    "source_a_hash": "a1b2c3d4",
    "source_b_hash": "e5f6g7h8",
    "timestamp": "2026-02-04T12:00:00Z"
  },
  "result": {
    "shared_principles": [
      {
        "id": "P1",
        "statement": "Compression that preserves meaning demonstrates comprehension",
        "confidence": "high",
        "n_count": 2,
        "source_a_evidence": "Quote from source A",
        "source_b_evidence": "Quote from source B",
        "alignment_note": "Identical meaning, different wording"
      }
    ],
    "source_a_only": [
      {
        "id": "A1",
        "statement": "Principle unique to source A",
        "n_count": 1
      }
    ],
    "source_b_only": [
      {
        "id": "B1",
        "statement": "Principle unique to source B",
        "n_count": 1
      }
    ],
    "divergence_analysis": {
      "total_divergent": 3,
      "domain_specific": 2,
      "version_drift": 1,
      "contradictions": 0
    }
  },
  "next_steps": [
    "Add a third source and run principle-synthesizer to confirm invariants (N=2 → N≥3)",
    "Investigate divergent principles — are they domain-specific or version drift?"
  ]
}

share_text (When Applicable)

Included only when high-confidence N=2 invariant is identified:

"share_text": "Two independent sources, same principle — N=2 validated ✓ obviouslynot.ai/pbd/{source_hash}"

Not triggered by count alone — requires genuine semantic alignment.

Note: The URL pattern obviouslynot.ai/pbd/{source_hash} is illustrative. Actual URL structure depends on deployment configuration.

Alignment Confidence

Terminology Rules

Error Handling

Related Skills

• •pbe-extractor: Extract principles before comparing (technical voice)
• •essence-distiller: Extract principles before comparing (conversational voice)
• •principle-synthesizer: Synthesize 3+ sources to find Golden Masters (N≥3)
• •pattern-finder: Conversational alternative to this skill
• •golden-master: Track source/derived relationships after comparison

Required Disclaimer

This skill compares STRUCTURE, not truth. Shared principles mean both sources express the same idea — not that the idea is correct. Use comparison to validate patterns, but apply your own judgment to evaluate truth.

Built by Obviously Not — Tools for thought, not conclusions.