Reviewing Source Code Changes
Guide for reviewing PRs and source code changes in packages/ and frameworks/.
When to Use This Guide
- •Reviewing pull requests modifying library source
- •Validating implementation patterns before merging
- •Checking code quality, types, documentation, and tests
Review Process
- •Understand the change — Read PR description, identify affected files
- •Check patterns — Verify code follows existing conventions
- •Verify types — Ensure type safety and proper inference
- •Review docs — Confirm JSDoc is complete and accurate
- •Check tests — Validate runtime and type test coverage
What to Review
Code Quality
| Check | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Naming | Matches existing patterns (FormStore, useField, createForm) |
| Purity annotation | // @__NO_SIDE_EFFECTS__ before pure factory functions |
| Import extensions | All imports use .ts extension |
| Interface vs type | Use interface for object shapes, type for unions/aliases |
| Folder structure | Methods: name.ts, index.ts. Primitives/components in their folder |
Good — purity annotation:
typescript
// @__NO_SIDE_EFFECTS__
export function useField<TSchema, TFieldPath>(
form: FormStore<TSchema>,
config: UseFieldConfig<TSchema, TFieldPath>
): FieldStore<TSchema, TFieldPath> {
return {
/* ... */
};
}
Bad — missing annotation:
typescript
export function useField<TSchema, TFieldPath>(
form: FormStore<TSchema>,
config: UseFieldConfig<TSchema, TFieldPath>
): FieldStore<TSchema, TFieldPath> {
return {
/* ... */
};
}
Type Safety
| Check | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Generic inference | Types infer correctly without explicit annotations |
| Constraints | Generic parameters have appropriate extends clauses |
| Return types | Explicit return types on exported functions |
| Type tests | .test-d.ts file covers type inference scenarios |
Good — constrained generic:
typescript
export function useField< TSchema extends Schema, TFieldPath extends RequiredPath<TSchema>, >( form: FormStore<TSchema>, config: UseFieldConfig<TSchema, TFieldPath> ): FieldStore<TSchema, TFieldPath>;
Documentation
| Check | Requirement |
|---|---|
| JSDoc present | All exported functions have JSDoc |
| First line | Action verb matching function purpose (see below) |
@param tags | Every parameter documented |
@returns tag | Return value documented |
| Overloads | Every overload has its own complete JSDoc block |
First line patterns by category:
| Category | Pattern |
|---|---|
| Primitives | Creates a ... |
| Methods | Focuses ..., Resets ..., Validates ... |
| Components | Renders a ... |
| Utilities | Returns ..., Gets ..., Sets ... |
Tests
| Check | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Runtime tests | .test.ts covers success cases, failure cases, edge cases |
| Type tests | .test-d.ts validates type inference with expectTypeOf |
| Error handling | Tests verify correct error messages and validation |
Common Issues
| Issue | What to Look For |
|---|---|
| Missing purity annotation | Factory function without // @__NO_SIDE_EFFECTS__ |
| Incomplete JSDoc | Missing @param or @returns, wrong description format |
| No type tests | New API without .test-d.ts file |
| Wrong import extension | Imports without .ts suffix |
| Inconsistent naming | Primitives not using create/use prefix, wrong Store suffix |
| Side effects in pure code | Mutations, I/O, or global state in primitive/method creation |
Checklist
- • Implementation follows existing patterns in similar files
- •
// @__NO_SIDE_EFFECTS__on pure factory functions - • All imports use
.tsextension - •
interfaceused for object shapes - • JSDoc complete on all exports
- • Runtime tests in
.test.ts - • Type tests in
.test-d.ts - • Naming conventions followed
- • Cross-framework consistency for shared APIs
Related Skills
- •
repo-structure-navigate— Navigate the codebase - •
repo-source-code-document— JSDoc requirements