Git Agentic Branching Strategy

Branching strategy guidance for agentic development using Lighthouse LM agents, commands, and skills.

Quick Start

Get branch recommendation:

code

"What branch should I create for implementing Epic 1 with 3 features?"
"Should I create wave branch or work directly on feature branch?"

Common scenarios:

code

- Single wave implementation → wave branch from development
- Feature with 2+ waves → feature branch from development or epic
- Multi-feature epic → epic branch → feature branches
- Bug fix → work directly on development
- Hotfix → hotfix branch from development

Core Principle

Progressive Coherence and Git Workflow:

•Each branch represents a coherent unit of work
•Epic branches contain coherent set of features
•Feature branches contain coherent set of waves
•Each commit represents completed wave (atomic, verifiable)

Branch Hierarchy

code

main (protected)
  └── development (integration branch)
       ├── epic-1-progressive-coherence (epic branch)
       │    ├── feature-1.10-infrastructure (feature branch)
       │    │    └── [commits for waves 1.10.1, 1.10.2, 1.10.3...]
       │    ├── feature-1.4-msa-templates (feature branch)
       │    │    └── [commits for waves 1.4.1, 1.4.2...]
       │    └── feature-1.5-addendum-templates (feature branch)
       │         └── [commits for waves 1.5.1, 1.5.2...]
       ├── epic-2-azure-integration (epic branch)
       │    └── feature-2.1-devops-mcp (feature branch)
       │         └── [commits for waves 2.1.1, 2.1.2...]
       ├── wave-3.1.1-standalone-skill (standalone wave from dev)
       └── hotfix-auth-token-validation (hotfix branch)

Branch Types

1. Main Branch (Protected)

Purpose: Production-ready code

Characteristics:

•Always deployable
•Protected with branch protection rules
•Only accepts PRs from development
•Linear history (squash or rebase merges)

Who uses: Release manager, automated releases

Agents: NEVER work directly on main

2. Development Branch (Integration)

Purpose: Integration point for all feature work

Naming: development

Merge from:

•Epic branches (after all features complete)
•Standalone feature branches
•Standalone wave branches
•Hotfix branches

Merge to: main (via PR only)

Who uses: All agents by default

Work directly on development for:

•Small changes (1-2 files, <1 hour)
•Bug fixes (non-critical)
•Documentation updates
•README changes
•Minor refactoring

Characteristics:

•NOT protected (allows direct merges from features)
•May have failing tests temporarily
•Receives frequent merges
•Testing ground before main

3. Epic Branches (Long-Lived)

Purpose: Isolate work for entire epic with multiple features

Naming: epic-{number}-{short-description}

Examples:

•epic-1-progressive-coherence
•epic-2-azure-integration
•epic-5-security-enhancements

Who uses: Agents working on multi-feature epics

Merge from: Feature branches within epic

Merge to: development when epic complete

Lifespan: Weeks to months

Work pattern:

•Create epic branch from development
•Create feature branches from epic
•Merge features → epic as they complete
•Merge epic → development when all features complete

When to use:

•✅ Epic has 2+ features
•✅ Epic will take >1 week
•✅ Want to integrate features before merging to development
•✅ Multiple agents working on same epic (different features)

4. Feature Branches (Medium-Lived)

Purpose: Implement entire feature with all its waves

Naming: feature-{epic}.{feature}-{short-description}

Examples:

•feature-1.10-infrastructure (part of epic 1)
•feature-1.4-msa-templates (part of epic 1)
•feature-2.1-devops-mcp (part of epic 2)

Who uses: Agents implementing features

Merge from: None (agents commit wave implementations directly)

Merge to:

•Epic branch (if part of epic)
•development (if standalone feature)

Lifespan: Days to weeks

Work pattern:

•Commit wave 1 directly to feature branch (NO wave branch)
•Commit wave 2 directly to feature branch
•Commit wave 3 directly to feature branch
•Merge entire feature when all waves complete

Commit format:

bash

git commit -m "feat(wave-1.10.1): Implement catalog change monitor"
git commit -m "feat(wave-1.10.2): Implement template staleness detection"
git commit -m "feat(wave-1.10.3): Implement impact analysis"

When to use:

•✅ Feature has 2+ waves
•✅ Feature is part of epic (create from epic branch)
•✅ Feature is standalone but multi-wave (create from development)

5. Standalone Wave Branches (Short-Lived)

Purpose: Implement single standalone wave (not part of epic)

Naming: wave-{epic}.{feature}.{wave}-{short-description}

Examples:

•wave-3.1.1-standalone-skill
•wave-4.2.1-quick-enhancement
•wave-5.3.1-bug-fix-validation

Who uses: Agents implementing standalone waves

Merge from: None (leaf branches)

Merge to: development (skip epic/feature branches)

Lifespan: Hours to days

Work pattern:

•Create wave branch from development
•Implement wave completely
•Merge directly to development

When to use:

•✅ Single wave implementation (not part of epic/feature)
•✅ Quick enhancement or addition
•✅ Standalone work item

When NOT to use:

•❌ Wave is part of multi-wave feature (commit directly to feature branch instead)
•❌ Simple bug fix (work directly on development)

6. Hotfix Branches (Urgent Fixes)

Purpose: Critical fixes that can't wait for normal workflow

Naming: hotfix-{short-description}

Examples:

•hotfix-auth-token-validation
•hotfix-security-vulnerability
•hotfix-data-corruption-fix

Who uses: Agents fixing critical bugs

Merge from: None

Merge to: development AND potentially main (fast-track)

Lifespan: Hours

Work pattern:

•Create hotfix branch from development
•Implement fix
•Merge to development
•If critical, merge to main via expedited PR

When to use:

•✅ Critical production bug
•✅ Security vulnerability
•✅ Data integrity issue
•✅ Service outage fix

Decision Framework

Quick Decision Tree

code

Is this a hotfix?
  └─ YES → Create hotfix branch from development
  └─ NO → Continue...

Is this a small change (<1 hour, 1-2 files)?
  └─ YES → Work directly on development
  └─ NO → Continue...

Is this a single wave?
  └─ YES → Create wave branch from development
  └─ NO → Continue...

Is this a feature with 2+ waves?
  └─ YES → Is feature part of epic?
       └─ YES → Create feature branch from epic branch
       └─ NO → Create feature branch from development
  └─ NO → Continue...

Is this an epic with 2+ features?
  └─ YES → Create epic branch from development, then create feature branches from epic

When to Create Epic Branch

Create Epic Branch If:

•✅ Epic has multiple features (2+ features)
•✅ Epic will take >1 week to complete
•✅ Want to integrate features together before merging to development
•✅ Multiple agents working on same epic simultaneously (different features)

Examples:

code

Epic 1: Progressive Coherence System
  - Feature 1.10: Infrastructure (3 waves)
  - Feature 1.4: MSA Templates (2 waves)
  - Feature 1.5: Addendum Templates (1 wave)
  → Create epic-1-progressive-coherence from development

Skip Epic Branch If:

•❌ Only 1 wave total (use wave branch from development)
•❌ Single feature with 1-3 waves (use feature branch from development)
•❌ Epic is simple documentation update (work on development)
•❌ Want immediate integration with other work

When to Create Feature Branch

Create Feature Branch If:

•✅ Feature has 2+ waves
•✅ Feature is part of larger epic (create from epic branch)
•✅ OR feature is standalone but has multiple waves (create from development)

Examples:

code

Feature 1.10: Infrastructure
  - Wave 1.10.1: Catalog change monitor
  - Wave 1.10.2: Template staleness detection
  - Wave 1.10.3: Impact analysis
  → Create feature-1.10-infrastructure from epic-1 (or development if standalone)
  → Commit all waves directly to feature branch

Skip Feature Branch If:

•❌ Single wave only (create standalone wave branch from development)
•❌ Simple bug fix or documentation (work directly on development)

When to Create Standalone Wave Branch

Create Wave Branch If:

•✅ Single wave implementation
•✅ Not part of existing epic or feature
•✅ Standalone work item

Examples:

code

Wave 3.1.1: Create new standalone skill
  → Create wave-3.1.1-standalone-skill from development
  → Implement wave completely
  → Merge directly to development

Don't Create Wave Branch If:

•❌ Wave is part of multi-wave feature (commit directly to feature branch)
•❌ Simple change (work directly on development)

Workflow Examples

Example 1: Multi-Feature Epic

Scenario: Epic 1 (Progressive Coherence) has 3 features with multiple waves each

Workflow:

bash

# 1. Create epic branch from development
git checkout development
git pull origin development
git checkout -b epic-1-progressive-coherence
git push -u origin epic-1-progressive-coherence

# 2. Create feature branch from epic for Feature 1.10
git checkout -b feature-1.10-infrastructure epic-1-progressive-coherence
git push -u origin feature-1.10-infrastructure

# 3. Implement Wave 1.10.1 directly on feature branch (NO wave branch)
# ... implement wave 1.10.1 ...
git add .
git commit -m "feat(wave-1.10.1): Implement catalog change monitor"
git push

# 4. Implement Wave 1.10.2 on same feature branch
# ... implement wave 1.10.2 ...
git add .
git commit -m "feat(wave-1.10.2): Implement template staleness detection"
git push

# 5. Implement Wave 1.10.3 on same feature branch
# ... implement wave 1.10.3 ...
git add .
git commit -m "feat(wave-1.10.3): Implement impact analysis"
git push

# 6. After all waves for feature 1.10 complete, merge feature → epic
gh pr create --base epic-1-progressive-coherence --head feature-1.10-infrastructure \
  --title "Feature 1.10: Infrastructure Complete" \
  --body "Completed waves 1.10.1, 1.10.2, 1.10.3"

# 7-9. Repeat for other features in epic...

# 10. After ALL features in epic complete, merge epic → development
git checkout epic-1-progressive-coherence
git pull origin epic-1-progressive-coherence
gh pr create --base development --head epic-1-progressive-coherence \
  --title "Epic 1: Progressive Coherence Complete" \
  --body "Completed features 1.10, 1.4, 1.5"

# 11. After epic merged to development, merge to main
git checkout development
git pull origin development
gh pr create --base main --head development

Example 2: Standalone Wave

Scenario: Implement single new skill (Wave 3.1.1), not part of epic

Workflow:

bash

# 1. Create wave branch from development
git checkout development
git pull origin development
git checkout -b wave-3.1.1-standalone-skill
git push -u origin wave-3.1.1-standalone-skill

# 2. Implement wave completely
# ... implement skill ...
git add .
git commit -m "feat(wave-3.1.1): Create new standalone skill"
git push

# 3. Merge wave → development
gh pr create --base development --head wave-3.1.1-standalone-skill \
  --title "Wave 3.1.1: Standalone Skill Complete"

Example 3: Standalone Feature (No Epic)

Scenario: Feature 4.2 (Reporting Enhancement) has 2 waves, not part of epic

Workflow:

bash

# 1. Create feature branch from development
git checkout development
git pull origin development
git checkout -b feature-4.2-reporting-enhancement
git push -u origin feature-4.2-reporting-enhancement

# 2. Implement Wave 4.2.1 directly on feature branch
# ... implement wave 4.2.1 ...
git add .
git commit -m "feat(wave-4.2.1): Add export functionality"
git push

# 3. Implement Wave 4.2.2 directly on feature branch
# ... implement wave 4.2.2 ...
git add .
git commit -m "feat(wave-4.2.2): Add visualization options"
git push

# 4. Merge feature → development
gh pr create --base development --head feature-4.2-reporting-enhancement \
  --title "Feature 4.2: Reporting Enhancement Complete" \
  --body "Completed waves 4.2.1, 4.2.2"

Example 4: Hotfix

Scenario: Critical security vulnerability needs immediate fix

Workflow:

bash

# 1. Create hotfix branch from development
git checkout development
git pull origin development
git checkout -b hotfix-security-vulnerability
git push -u origin hotfix-security-vulnerability

# 2. Implement fix
# ... implement fix ...
git add .
git commit -m "fix(hotfix): Patch security vulnerability CVE-2025-1234"
git push

# 3. Merge to development
gh pr create --base development --head hotfix-security-vulnerability \
  --title "Hotfix: Security Vulnerability CVE-2025-1234"

# 4. If critical, create expedited PR to main
gh pr create --base main --head development \
  --title "Emergency Release: Security Fix"

Integration with Lighthouse LM

Skill Returns Branch Recommendation

Input from user/agent:

code

"I'm implementing Epic 1 which has 3 features, each with 2-3 waves. What branch strategy should I use?"

Skill output:

markdown

## Branch Strategy Recommendation

**Work Type**: Multi-feature epic (3 features, 8 total waves)

**Recommended Strategy**: Epic → Feature → Commits

### Step-by-Step:

1. **Create Epic Branch**
   ```bash
   git checkout development
   git pull origin development
   git checkout -b epic-1-progressive-coherence
   git push -u origin epic-1-progressive-coherence

•

For Each Feature (1.10, 1.4, 1.5):

bash

git checkout epic-1-progressive-coherence
git checkout -b feature-1.10-infrastructure epic-1-progressive-coherence
git push -u origin feature-1.10-infrastructure

•

Implement Waves as Commits (on feature branch):

bash

# Wave 1.10.1
git add .
git commit -m "feat(wave-1.10.1): Implement catalog change monitor"
git push

# Wave 1.10.2
git add .
git commit -m "feat(wave-1.10.2): Implement template staleness detection"
git push

# ... continue for all waves ...

•

Merge Feature → Epic (after all waves complete):

bash

gh pr create --base epic-1-progressive-coherence --head feature-1.10-infrastructure

•

Merge Epic → Development (after all features complete):

bash

gh pr create --base development --head epic-1-progressive-coherence

Why This Strategy:

•✅ Isolates epic work from development
•✅ Organizes waves by feature
•✅ No wave branches (commit directly to feature)
•✅ Progressive integration (feature → epic → development)

code


---

## Questions to Ask User

**What are you implementing?** (required)
- Single wave
- Feature with multiple waves
- Epic with multiple features
- Bug fix or documentation

**Is this part of existing epic?** (if feature)
- Yes (create feature branch from epic)
- No (create feature branch from development)

**How many waves in feature?** (if feature)
- 1 wave → Use wave branch
- 2+ waves → Use feature branch

**How many features in epic?** (if epic)
- 1 feature → Skip epic branch, use feature branch
- 2+ features → Use epic branch

**Is this urgent/critical?** (if bug fix)
- Yes → Use hotfix branch
- No → Work on development or create wave branch

---

## Available Resources

### References

- **references/branching-scenarios.md** — Detailed scenarios with examples
- **references/branch-naming-conventions.md** — Naming standards and examples
- **references/merge-strategies.md** — When to merge, how to merge, merge conflicts

---

## Success Criteria

- ✅ Agent understands which branch type to use
- ✅ Agent knows where to create branch from (development, epic, feature)
- ✅ Agent knows when to commit directly vs. create branch
- ✅ Agent follows Progressive Coherence principles in branching
- ✅ Branch names follow conventions
- ✅ Merge targets correct

---

## Tips for Effective Branching

1. **Default to development** for small changes
2. **Use wave branches** only for standalone single waves
3. **Commit waves directly** to feature branches (no wave branches)
4. **Create epic branches** only for multi-feature epics
5. **Keep branch names descriptive** but concise
6. **Merge frequently** to avoid long-lived divergence
7. **Use conventional commit** format for wave commits

---

**Last Updated**: 2025-01-30