Bias Scoring Skill
This skill uses Argumentation Mining to identify logical structures and flag "System 1" intuition errors, assigning a quantitative Bias Score.
Workflow
- •
Argumentation Mining:
- •Parse the text to identify Premises (evidence) and Conclusions (decisions).
- •Identify logical connectors (therefore, because, thus).
- •Flag "Orphaned Conclusions" (claims with no linked evidence).
- •
Bias Detection (The Detective):
- •Scan for specific cognitive markers:
- •Confirmation Bias: Only citing supporting evidence, ignoring contrary data.
- •Anchoring: Over-reliance on the first piece of data presented.
- •Halo Effect: Assuming success in one area implies success in another.
- •Sunk Cost Fallacy: Justifying future investment based on past spend.
- •VERMILLION Framework Markers:
- •Vague "their": Pronouns that hide accountability (e.g., "They decided" without naming the entity).
- •Mechanical Punctuation: Overuse of em-dashes (—) to bridge ideas instead of logical connectives, masking a lack of causality.
- •Inflexible Paragraphing / Hedging: Overuse of modal verbs like "possibly," "might," or "could" to avoid commitment, signaling low confidence in the underlying data.
- •Scan for specific cognitive markers:
- •
Scoring Model (0-5 Scale):
- •0 - Clean: Purely logical, evidence-based, balanced.
- •1 - Low: Minor phrasing issues, but sound logic.
- •2 - Moderate: One unverified premise or mild emotive language.
- •3 - Significant: Clear logical gap or evident "System 1" shortcut (e.g., "I feel that...").
- •4 - High: Multiple logical fallacies, strong emotional driving.
- •5 - Critical: Purely intuitive decision with no data backing, or dangerous groupthink markers.
- •
Output Artifact:
- •Bias Heatmap: Return the text with high-bias sections highlighted (or quoted).
- •Bias Score: The calculated integer.
- •Primary Bias Type: The dominant distortion found.