AgentSkillsCN

writing-plans

当您拥有针对多步骤任务的规格或需求,但在动手编写代码之前使用此功能。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: writing-plans
description: Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code

Writing Plans

Overview

Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.

Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.

Announce at start: "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."

Context: This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).

Save plans to Obsidian: Simbian/plans/implementation/YYYY/MM/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>-implementation-plan.md

Folder requirement: Create missing vault folders before saving the note.

Bite-Sized Task Granularity

Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):

  • "Write the failing test" - step
  • "Run it to make sure it fails" - step
  • "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step
  • "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step
  • "Commit" - step

Plan Document Header

Every plan MUST start with this header:

markdown
# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan

> **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.

**Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]

**Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]

**Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]

---

Task Structure

markdown
### Task N: [Component Name]

**Files:**
- Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
- Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
- Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`

**Step 1: Write the failing test**

```python
def test_specific_behavior():
    result = function(input)
    assert result == expected
```

**Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**

Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"

**Step 3: Write minimal implementation**

```python
def function(input):
    return expected
```

**Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**

Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
Expected: PASS

**Step 5: Commit**

```bash
git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
```

Remember

  • Exact file paths always
  • Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
  • Exact commands with expected output
  • Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
  • DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits

Todoist Tracking (After Plan Creation)

Immediately after saving the plan in Obsidian:

  1. Ask the user: "Do you want me to create a matching Todoist tracking list for this plan? (recommended - say 'skip' to skip)"
  2. If user says skip: continue to Execution Handoff.
  3. If user says yes:
    • Keep plan title and Todoist title exactly the same.
    • Use the exact plan title from the H1 heading (# [Feature Name] Implementation Plan) as the Todoist parent task title.
    • Create one Todoist subtask per plan task (Task 1, Task 2, etc.) in the same order.

Execution Handoff

After saving the plan (and Todoist tracking unless skipped), offer execution choice:

"Plan complete and saved to Simbian/plans/implementation/<YYYY>/<MM>/<filename>.md. Two execution options:

1. Subagent-Driven (this session) - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration

2. Parallel Session (separate) - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints

Which approach?"

If Subagent-Driven chosen:

  • REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development
  • Stay in this session
  • Fresh subagent per task + code review

If Parallel Session chosen:

  • Guide them to open new session in worktree
  • REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: New session uses superpowers:executing-plans