AgentSkillsCN

review-steps

对文档进行结构化审校,打磨语言、提升清晰度、确保结构一致性,并对照最佳实践进行比对。适用于当一份草稿虽有基本框架,但亟需一次全面细致的审阅时使用。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: review-steps
description: Structured review for polishing documents. Fixes language, improves clarity, checks structural consistency, and compares against best practice. Use when a draft has structure but needs a thorough review pass.
argument-hint: <file|folder>...

This skill is for polishing existing documents at $ARGUMENTS — not generating structure (flesh-out) or critiquing substance (strong-edit).

Stop after each stage and have changes reviewed with user.

Note: Review improves what exists within its structure. The agent handles mechanical checks and research; the developer holds final authority on judgment calls. When a suggestion changes meaning, ask — don't assume.

See responsibilities.md for the full agent/developer ownership matrix.

  1. Read and understand the document (developer confirms)

    • Read the target document and identify its current state
    • What is the document about and who is the intended audience?
    • Is this a draft that needs polish, or does it need more fundamental work (flesh-out or strong-edit instead)?
    • Confirm understanding before proceeding
  2. Review for language and consistency (agent leads, developer approves)

    • Are there spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors?
    • Is terminology used consistently throughout?
    • Are there inconsistent patterns (e.g. mixing "e.g." and "for example")?
    • Fix issues and present changes for approval
  3. Review for conceptual clarity (agent leads, developer approves)

    • Are there incomplete sentences or unclear phrasing?
    • Are acronyms expanded on first use?
    • Are there concepts that need further explanation for the target audience?
    • Are there terms that should be added to a glossary?
    • Ask: are any deliberately terse sections intentional (e.g. notes-to-self, placeholders)?
  4. Review vs relevant structure (agent leads, developer approves)

    • Do other documents in the same folder or project follow a defined structure?
    • Does this document conform to that structure, or deviate for good reason?
    • Are there missing sections that the structure expects?
    • Ask: are structural deviations intentional?
  5. Review vs industry best practice (agent assists, developer leads)

    • Web search for relevant frameworks and approaches in this domain
    • How does this document compare against industry patterns?
    • Are there gaps, missing considerations, or areas for improvement?
    • Identify unique differentiators worth preserving
    • Present findings as discussion points — the developer judges relevance and fit
  6. Tidy up (agent leads, developer approves)

    • Add markup links for 3rd party tools and concepts referenced in the text
    • Check with the user where to update the glossary
    • Add terms that needed clarification

Pipeline Position

This skill sits in the middle of the composition pipeline: flesh-out -> review-steps -> strong-edit -> agent-optimize. Use it after a document has structure, before it needs critical evaluation.

When to Use This vs Other Skills

Document StateUse
Raw notes, bullets, stream of consciousnessflesh-out
Draft with structure, needs polishreview-steps
Complete draft needing critical evaluationstrong-edit
Finalized document needs agent-friendly restructuringagent-optimize