Reflect - Agent Self-Improvement Skill

Transform your AI assistant into a continuously improving partner. Every correction becomes a permanent improvement that persists across all future sessions.

Quick Reference

When to Use

• •After completing complex tasks
• •When user explicitly corrects behavior ("never do X", "always Y")
• •At session boundaries or before context compaction
• •When successful patterns are worth preserving

Workflow

Step 1: Scan Conversation for Signals

Analyze the conversation for correction signals and learning opportunities.

Signal Confidence Levels:

See data/signal_patterns.md for full detection rules.

Step 2: Classify & Match to Target Files

Map each signal to the appropriate target:

See data/agent_mappings.md for mapping rules.

Step 3: Check for Skill-Worthy Signals

Some learnings should become new skills rather than agent updates:

Skill-Worthy Criteria:

• •Non-obvious debugging (>10 min investigation)
• •Misleading error (root cause different from message)
• •Workaround discovered through experimentation
• •Configuration insight (differs from documented)
• •Reusable pattern (helps in similar situations)

Quality Gates (must pass all):

• • Reusable: Will help with future tasks
• • Non-trivial: Requires discovery, not just docs
• • Specific: Can describe exact trigger conditions
• • Verified: Solution actually worked
• • No duplication: Doesn't exist already

Step 4: Generate Proposals

Present findings in structured format:

# Reflection Analysis

## Session Context
- **Date**: [timestamp]
- **Messages Analyzed**: [count]

## Signals Detected

| # | Signal | Confidence | Source Quote | Category |
|---|--------|------------|--------------|----------|
| 1 | [learning] | HIGH | "[exact words]" | Code Style |

## Proposed Changes

### Change 1: Update [agent-name]
**Target**: `[file path]`
**Section**: [section name]
**Confidence**: HIGH

```diff
+ New rule from learning

Review Prompt

Apply these changes? (Y/N/modify/1,2,3)

### Step 5: Apply with User Approval

**On `Y` (approve):**
1. Apply each change using Edit tool
2. Commit with descriptive message
3. Update metrics

**On `N` (reject):**
1. Discard proposed changes
2. Log rejection for analysis

**On `modify`:**
1. Present each change individually
2. Allow editing before applying

**On selective (e.g., `1,3`):**
1. Apply only specified changes
2. Commit partial updates

## State Management

State is stored in `~/.reflect/` (configurable via `REFLECT_STATE_DIR`):

```yaml
# reflect-state.yaml
auto_reflect: false
last_reflection: "2026-01-26T10:30:00Z"
pending_reviews: []

Metrics Tracking

# reflect-metrics.yaml
total_sessions_analyzed: 42
total_signals_detected: 156
total_changes_accepted: 89
acceptance_rate: 78%
confidence_breakdown:
  high: 45
  medium: 32
  low: 12
most_updated_agents:
  code-reviewer: 23
  backend-developer: 18
skills_created: 5

Safety Guardrails

Human-in-the-Loop

• •NEVER apply changes without explicit user approval
• •Always show full diff before applying
• •Allow selective application

Incremental Updates

• •ONLY add to existing sections
• •NEVER delete or rewrite existing rules
• •Preserve original structure

Conflict Detection

• •Check if proposed rule contradicts existing
• •Warn user if conflict detected
• •Suggest resolution strategy

Output Locations

Project-level (versioned with repo):

• •.claude/reflections/YYYY-MM-DD_HH-MM-SS.md - Full reflection
• •.claude/skills/{name}/SKILL.md - New skills

Global (user-level):

• •~/.reflect/learnings.yaml - Learning log
• •~/.reflect/reflect-metrics.yaml - Aggregate metrics

Examples

Example 1: Code Style Correction

User says: "Never use var in TypeScript, always use const or let"

Signal detected:

• •Confidence: HIGH (explicit "never" + "always")
• •Category: Code Style
• •Target: frontend-developer.md

Proposed change:

## Style Guidelines
+ * Use `const` or `let` instead of `var` in TypeScript

Example 2: Process Preference

User says: "Always run tests before committing"

Signal detected:

• •Confidence: HIGH (explicit "always")
• •Category: Process
• •Target: CLAUDE.md

Proposed change:

## Commit Hygiene
+ * Run test suite before creating commits

Example 3: New Skill from Debugging

Context: Spent 30 minutes debugging a React hydration mismatch

Signal detected:

• •Confidence: HIGH (non-trivial debugging)
• •Category: New Skill
• •Quality gates: All passed

Proposed skill: react-hydration-fix/SKILL.md

Troubleshooting

No signals detected:

• •Session may not have had corrections
• •Check if using natural language corrections

Conflict warning:

• •Review the existing rule cited
• •Decide if new rule should override
• •Can modify before applying

Agent file not found:

• •Check agent name spelling
• •May need to create agent file first