AgentSkillsCN

documentation

代码、PR 以及技术沟通的文档编写实践。当您完成功能开发、审查代码,或为 PR 做准备时,可调用此技能。

SKILL.md
--- frontmatter
name: documentation
description: Documentation practices for code, PRs, and technical communication. Use when completing features, reviewing code, or preparing for PR.

Documentation

Philosophy

Code is the primary documentation. Write docs that add value, not noise.

Code Comments

  • Code should be self-documenting — good names, clear structure
  • Type definitions as documentation — well-typed code is self-documenting
  • Add comments only when they add value: why, not what
  • Complex business logic, non-obvious decisions, workarounds — worth a comment
  • Decision context: when code looks wrong but is intentional, explain why — saves future dev from "fixing" it

Inline Examples

  • For utilities or complex functions, a usage example in the docstring beats paragraphs of explanation

README

  • Update README when adding features, changing setup, or altering usage
  • Keep it current — stale docs are worse than no docs

Changelog

  • Maintain CHANGELOG.md for user-facing changes
  • Follow Keep a Changelog format

API Documentation

  • Document public APIs — endpoints, params, responses, errors
  • Use OpenAPI/Swagger for REST
  • Keep in sync with code

Deprecation Notices

  • Mark deprecated code clearly
  • Include: why, when it will be removed, what to use instead

Technical Diagrams

  • Suggest a diagram when feature involves: multiple services, complex data flow, state machines, or non-trivial architecture
  • Ask: "Would a diagram help the next dev understand this faster?"

Engineering Documents

  • Suggest a technical doc for: significant new features, architectural decisions, complex integrations
  • ADRs (Architecture Decision Records) for decisions worth preserving

Onboarding Context

  • For complex domains, a brief "concepts" or "glossary" doc helps new devs ramp up

PR Description

  • Suggest PR description content: what changed, why, how to test
  • Link to relevant tickets/issues
  • Call out anything reviewers should focus on