Doc Co-Authoring
Structured workflow for co-authoring documentation including proposals, technical specs, decision docs, and similar content. Three stages: Context Gathering, Refinement & Structure, and Reader Testing.
Prerequisites
- •Clear understanding of document purpose
- •Access to relevant context (channels, docs, stakeholders)
- •Time for iterative refinement
Instructions
Stage 1: Context Gathering
- •
Ask Initial Questions
- •What type of document? (technical spec, decision doc, proposal)
- •Who's the primary audience?
- •What's the desired impact?
- •Any template or format to follow?
- •
Encourage Info Dumping
- •Background on project/problem
- •Related team discussions
- •Why alternatives aren't being used
- •Timeline pressures or constraints
- •
Ask Clarifying Questions
- •Generate 5-10 questions based on gaps
- •Allow shorthand answers
Stage 2: Refinement & Structure
- •
For Each Section:
- •Ask clarifying questions about content
- •Brainstorm 5-20 options
- •User curates (keep/remove/combine)
- •Draft the section
- •Iterate with surgical edits
- •
Use
str_replacefor edits - never reprint whole doc - •
Quality Check - After 3 iterations, ask if anything can be removed
Stage 3: Reader Testing
- •Predict Reader Questions (5-10 questions)
- •Test with Fresh Context - no context bleed
- •Check for:
- •Ambiguity or unclear sections
- •Assumed knowledge
- •Internal contradictions
- •Fix gaps found during testing
Error Handling
- •If user wants to skip a stage, allow freeform work
- •If context is missing, proactively ask
- •Address gaps as they come up, don't accumulate
Notes
- •Quality over speed
- •Each iteration should make meaningful improvements
- •Goal: document that actually works for readers
Source: anthropics/skills