IF Phase 10 Quality Score >= 80:
    THEN Execute Phase 11
ELSE:
    FIX Phase 10 issues first

Always include:
- User (20%)
- Designer (15%)
- Entrepreneur (20%)
- Marketer (15%)
- Developer (10%)

Include if applicable:
- Investor: IF seeking_funding = true
- CS: IF has_user_support = true
- Legal: IF handles_personal_data = true OR regulated_industry = true
- Analyst: IF data_driven = true
- DevOps: IF self_hosted = true OR complex_infra = true

Adjust weights proportionally to sum = 100%

Launch all active personas in parallel (background):

task(
  subagent_type="product-reviewer-user",
  run_in_background=true,
  prompt="Evaluate product from end-user perspective..."
)

task(
  subagent_type="product-reviewer-designer",
  run_in_background=true,
  prompt="Evaluate product design and UX..."
)

... (repeat for all active personas)

Wait for all to complete.
Collect results.

## Score Calculation

Product Score = Σ (Persona Score × Weight)

Example (Core 5 only):
- User: 85/100 × 0.25 = 21.25
- Designer: 78/100 × 0.20 = 15.60
- Entrepreneur: 82/100 × 0.25 = 20.50
- Marketer: 71/100 × 0.18 = 12.78
- Developer: 90/100 × 0.12 = 10.80
─────────────────────────────────
Product Score = 80.93/100

## Phase 11 Product Review Complete

### Overall Product Score: [X]/100

### Persona Breakdown
| Persona | Score | Weight | Weighted |
|---------|-------|--------|----------|
| User | X/100 | 25% | X |
| Designer | X/100 | 20% | X |
| Entrepreneur | X/100 | 25% | X |
| Marketer | X/100 | 18% | X |
| Developer | X/100 | 12% | X |

### Red Flags (Score < 70)
- [ ] [Persona]: [Issue] - [Impact]

### Strengths (Score > 85)
- [ ] [Persona]: [Strength]

### Critical Issues (Must Fix)
1. ...

### Recommendations (Should Fix)
1. ...

### Quick Wins (Low Effort, High Impact)
1. ...

### Launch Readiness
- [ ] Product Score >= 75: Ready to launch
- [ ] All Critical Issues resolved
- [ ] No Red Flags blocking launch

Even if overall score is high, block if:
- User Score < 60 (unusable)
- Legal Score < 60 (compliance risk)
- DevOps Score < 50 (unstable)
- Security issues found (from Developer review)

You are product-reviewer-user. Evaluate this product.

Product: [Product Name]
Target User: [User Description]
Core Problem: [Problem Statement]

Evaluate from end-user perspective:
1. First Impression (0-10)
2. Onboarding Experience (0-10)
3. Core Task Completion (0-10)
4. Performance & Speed (0-10)
5. Frustration Points (0-10)
6. Delight Moments (0-10)
7. Problem-Solution Fit (0-10)
8. Would Return (0-10)
9. Would Recommend (0-10)
10. Would Pay (0-10)

For each, provide:
- Score with justification
- Specific evidence
- Improvement suggestion

End with:
- Overall User Score: X/100
- Top 3 Issues
- Top 3 Strengths
- Key Quote: "As a [user], I felt [emotion] because [reason]"

You are product-reviewer-designer. Evaluate this product.

Product: [Product Name]
Design System: [If exists]

Evaluate design and UX:
1. Visual Hierarchy (0-10)
2. Typography (0-10)
3. Color System (0-10)
4. Layout & Spacing (0-10)
5. Interaction Design (0-10)
6. Consistency (0-10)
7. Responsive Design (0-10)
8. Accessibility (0-10)
9. Polish & Detail (0-10)
10. Innovation & Delight (0-10)

Include:
- WCAG 2.1 compliance check
- Responsive breakpoint test
- Color contrast validation

End with:
- Overall Design Score: X/100
- Critical Design Issues
- Accessibility Concerns
- Polish Recommendations

You are product-reviewer-entrepreneur. Evaluate this product.

Product: [Product Name]
Market: [Target Market]
Competitors: [Known Competitors]

Evaluate business viability:
1. Problem-Solution Fit (0-10)
2. Value Proposition Clarity (0-10)
3. Target Market Definition (0-10)
4. Competitive Differentiation (0-10)
5. Business Model Viability (0-10)
6. Scalability (0-10)
7. Market Size (0-10)
8. Timing (0-10)
9. Founder-Market Fit (0-10)
10. Execution Quality (0-10)

End with:
- Overall Business Score: X/100
- Investment Potential: [Would/Wouldn't invest, why]
- Key Risks
- Strategic Recommendations
- Potential Pivots (if needed)

You are product-reviewer-marketer. Evaluate this product.

Product: [Product Name]
Current Channels: [If any]

Evaluate go-to-market readiness:
1. Hook Quality (0-10)
2. Landing Page Effectiveness (0-10)
3. Viral Potential (0-10)
4. SEO Readiness (0-10)
5. Conversion Funnel (0-10)
6. Social Proof (0-10)
7. Messaging Clarity (0-10)
8. Mobile Marketing Readiness (0-10)
9. Retention Mechanics (0-10)
10. Competitive Positioning (0-10)

End with:
- Overall GTM Score: X/100
- Top Growth Opportunities
- Critical Marketing Gaps
- Suggested Experiments
- Headline/CTA Recommendations

You are product-reviewer-developer. Evaluate this product.

Product: [Product Name]
Tech Stack: [Stack Details]

Evaluate technical sustainability:
1. Code Readability (0-10)
2. Documentation Quality (0-10)
3. Test Coverage & Quality (0-10)
4. Architecture Quality (0-10)
5. Error Handling & Logging (0-10)
6. Security Practices (0-10)
7. Performance Considerations (0-10)
8. Development Experience (0-10)
9. Deployment & Operations (0-10)
10. Technical Debt (0-10)

End with:
- Overall Maintainability Score: X/100
- Would I Want to Maintain This: [Yes/No, why]
- Critical Tech Debt Items
- Security Concerns
- Onboarding Time Estimate

Phase 10: Quality Score (Code)
    ↓ (IF Score >= 80)
Phase 11: Product Review (Multi-Persona)
    ↓ (IF Score >= 75)
LAUNCH READY

## Phase 11: Multi-Persona Product Review (AUTO-EXECUTE)

**Triggered after Phase 10 >= 80**

1. Determine active personas based on product type
2. Launch all reviewers in parallel (background)
3. Aggregate scores with weights
4. Generate comprehensive report
5. Decision:
   - Score >= 75: Proceed to launch
   - Score < 75: Fix issues, re-review

## Phase 11 Product Review Complete

### ADHD CBT App Evaluation

**Overall Product Score: 78/100** ✅ (Launch Ready)

### Persona Breakdown

| Persona | Score | Weight | Weighted | Status |
|---------|-------|--------|----------|--------|
| User | 82/100 | 25% | 20.5 | ✅ |
| Designer | 75/100 | 20% | 15.0 | ✅ |
| Entrepreneur | 80/100 | 25% | 20.0 | ✅ |
| Marketer | 68/100 | 18% | 12.2 | ⚠️ |
| Developer | 88/100 | 12% | 10.6 | ✅ |

### Red Flags (Score < 70)
⚠️ **Marketer (68/100)**:
- Weak hook - "CBT for ADHD" not compelling
- No viral mechanics
- No social proof yet

### Strengths (Score > 85)
✅ **Developer (88/100)**:
- Excellent code quality
- Comprehensive tests
- Well-documented

### Critical Issues (Must Fix Before Launch)
1. **Improve marketing hook**
   - Current: "ADHD CBT App"
   - Suggested: "Rewire Your ADHD Brain in 5 Minutes a Day"

### Recommendations
1. Add testimonial section (even if just quotes)
2. Implement share feature for completed exercises
3. Add streak/gamification for retention

### Quick Wins
1. Update headline (10 min)
2. Add "as seen on" placeholder (5 min)
3. Add social share buttons (1 hr)

### Launch Readiness Checklist
- [x] Product Score >= 75
- [x] No User Score < 60
- [x] No Legal Score < 60
- [x] No DevOps Score < 50
- [ ] All Critical Issues resolved ← PENDING

**Recommendation**: Fix marketing hook, then launch to beta.

# Healthcare SaaS
additional_personas:
  - product-reviewer-clinician
  - product-reviewer-patient
  - product-reviewer-hipaa

# Fintech
additional_personas:
  - product-reviewer-compliance
  - product-reviewer-risk
  - product-reviewer-trader

# Early Stage (focus on PMF)
weights:
  user: 30%
  entrepreneur: 30%
  designer: 15%
  marketer: 15%
  developer: 10%

# Growth Stage (focus on scale)
weights:
  user: 20%
  marketer: 25%
  devops: 20%
  analyst: 15%
  developer: 10%
  designer: 10%