Deep Research
Purpose
Conduct comprehensive research using multiple sources, cross-verification, and systematic analysis to provide accurate, well-sourced information.
Activation Keywords
- •deep research, comprehensive research
- •fact check, verify, validate
- •multi-source, cross-reference
- •investigate, analyze thoroughly
- •research report, findings
Core Capabilities
1. Multi-Source Research
- •Web search aggregation
- •Academic sources
- •Official documentation
- •Expert opinions
- •Primary sources
2. Verification
- •Cross-reference facts
- •Source credibility assessment
- •Bias detection
- •Recency validation
- •Citation tracking
3. Analysis
- •Pattern identification
- •Trend analysis
- •Gap detection
- •Contradiction resolution
- •Synthesis
4. Documentation
- •Structured findings
- •Source attribution
- •Confidence levels
- •Limitations noted
- •Actionable insights
5. Quality Assurance
- •Fact accuracy check
- •Source diversity
- •Completeness assessment
- •Objectivity review
Research Methodology
code
1. Define Scope → Clear research questions → Success criteria → Time/depth constraints 2. Gather Sources → Primary sources (official docs, APIs) → Secondary sources (articles, reports) → Tertiary sources (summaries, reviews) → Minimum 5+ independent sources 3. Verify & Cross-Reference → Fact triangulation → Date verification → Author credibility → Source independence 4. Analyze & Synthesize → Pattern extraction → Contradiction resolution → Gap identification → Insight generation 5. Document Findings → Executive summary → Detailed findings → Source citations → Confidence ratings → Limitations
Source Credibility Matrix
| Source Type | Credibility | Use Case |
|---|---|---|
| Official docs | High | Technical facts |
| Peer-reviewed | High | Scientific claims |
| Industry reports | Medium-High | Market data |
| News outlets | Medium | Current events |
| Blogs/Forums | Low-Medium | Community sentiment |
| Social media | Low | Trend indicators |
Research Report Template
markdown
# Research Report: [Topic] ## Executive Summary [2-3 sentence overview] ## Key Findings 1. [Finding with source] 2. [Finding with source] 3. [Finding with source] ## Detailed Analysis ### [Subtopic 1] [Analysis with citations] ### [Subtopic 2] [Analysis with citations] ## Sources - [Source 1] - [Credibility: High/Medium/Low] - [Source 2] - [Credibility: High/Medium/Low] ## Confidence Assessment - Overall: [High/Medium/Low] - Areas of uncertainty: [List] ## Limitations - [Limitation 1] - [Limitation 2] ## Recommendations 1. [Actionable recommendation] 2. [Actionable recommendation]
Example Usage
code
User: "Research the current state of WebAssembly adoption" Deep Research Response: 1. Define scope - Adoption metrics - Use cases - Browser support - Performance benchmarks 2. Sources gathered (7) - WebAssembly.org (official) - MDN Web Docs - State of JS 2024 survey - GitHub usage statistics - Browser release notes - Industry case studies - Performance benchmarks 3. Key findings - 95%+ browser support - Growing in serverless - Primary use: performance-critical - Major adopters: Figma, Google Earth 4. Confidence: High - Multiple corroborating sources - Recent data (2024) - Official documentation verified