Spec Executor

Executes implementation specs (typically created by the spec-writer skill). Follows specs exactly with batched execution, checkpoints for user feedback, and parallelization support.

Arguments

•spec-file (required): Path to the spec file to execute
•--batch-size=<n>: Steps per checkpoint (overrides config)
•--no-checkpoint: Run without pausing for checkpoints
•--dry-run: Show what would be done without making changes
•--resume: Resume from last checkpoint
•--parallel=<true|false>: Enable/disable parallelization

Configuration

Check for .claude/spec-workflow/config.yaml:

yaml

paths:
  worktrees: "./worktrees"

services:
  backend:
    path: "./backend"
    build: "npm run build"
    test: "npm test"
    lint: "npm run lint"
  frontend:
    path: "./frontend"
    build: "npm run build"
    test: "npm test"

execution:
  batchSize: 5
  checkpoint:
    behavior: "smart"           # "pause" | "continue" | "smart"
  parallel:
    enabled: true
    maxAgents: 3

If no config, auto-detect services and use defaults.

Core Philosophy

Follow the spec. Stop on blockers. Never guess.

This skill prioritizes:

•Spec-driven execution - Follow spec instructions exactly, don't improvise
•Stop on blockers - Pause and ask rather than guess when something is unclear
•Parallelization-aware - Use sub-agents for concurrent work when spec indicates
•Leveraging git worktrees - Isolate spec work in dedicated worktrees

Phase 1: Environment Setup

Before executing, verify the environment is ready:

Check for worktree (if specified in spec)

If spec frontmatter contains worktree:

•Verify worktree exists at configured path (default: ./worktrees/[name])
•Ensure we're working in that worktree
•Verify branch matches frontmatter

If worktree doesn't exist:

•Notify user: "Spec references worktree that doesn't exist. Create it?"
•If yes, invoke /create-worktree [name] --spec=[spec-path]
•Continue once created

If no worktree specified

Proceed in current directory, but warn user that changes won't be isolated.

Phase 2: Load & Review

•
Read the full spec file
•
Parse the spec
- •Extract Implementation Steps table
- •Identify parallelization groups (if present)
- •Note any Open Questions or unresolved items
- •Check spec status

•

Review critically before starting

Present a summary:

code

**Spec Review: [Feature Name]**

**Tasks:** [N] implementation steps
**Parallelization:** [Yes/No - describe groups if present]
**Dependencies:** [List any external dependencies]
**Estimated scope:** [Small/Medium/Large based on task count]

**Concerns before starting:**
- [Any unclear instructions]
- [Any unresolved Open Questions from spec]
- [Any missing information]

**Parallelization Plan:**
[Describe how tasks will be parallelized if applicable]

Ready to proceed?

If --dry-run, stop here after showing the plan.

Phase 3: Execute Batch

Task Execution

For each task in the current batch:

•Mark task in_progress in todo list
•Read related files mentioned in spec's Appendix
•Execute the task following spec instructions exactly
•Run verification if specified (tests, lint, build)
•Mark task completed

Parallelization

If spec includes a Sub-agent Parallelization Plan:

•Identify independent tasks in current group
•Launch sub-agents using Task tool for parallel execution
•Wait for all agents to complete before proceeding
•Collect results and verify all succeeded

code

Launching parallel execution for Group 1:

Agent 1: Task 1.1 - [Description]
Agent 2: Task 1.2 - [Description]

Waiting for completion...

Respect execution.parallel.maxAgents from config.

Following the Spec

DO:

•Follow Implementation Steps in order (respecting dependencies)
•Use patterns described in Architecture & Design section
•Implement exactly what's specified in Requirements
•Run verifications specified in Validation & Testing Plan

DON'T:

•Add features not in the spec
•Skip steps or combine tasks arbitrarily
•Ignore the spec's design decisions
•Proceed past blockers without asking

Phase 4: Report & Checkpoint

After each batch (based on batchSize):

code

**Checkpoint: Batch [N] Complete**

**Completed tasks:**
- [x] Task 1: [Brief description of what was done]
- [x] Task 2: [Brief description of what was done]

**Verification results:**
- Tests: [Pass/Fail - details]
- Lint: [Pass/Fail]
- Build: [Pass/Fail]

**Files modified:**
- `path/to/file1` - [What changed]
- `path/to/file2` - [What changed]

**Next batch:** Tasks [N+1] through [N+3]

Checkpoint behavior (from config or argument):

•pause: Always pause for user review
•continue: Auto-continue if no issues
•smart: Pause on warnings/errors, continue otherwise

Phase 5: Continue

•Apply feedback from previous checkpoint
•Execute next batch following Phase 3 process
•Report progress following Phase 4 process
•Repeat until all tasks complete

Phase 6: Finalize

After all tasks complete:

•
Run full validation

For each service in spec's services frontmatter (or all configured services if not specified):
code
```
# Use commands from config, or auto-detect
[service.build command]
[service.lint command]
[service.test command]
```
•
Update spec status
- •Edit spec file frontmatter to change status to "Implemented"
- •Add completion date

•

Final summary

code

**Spec Execution Complete: [Feature Name]**

**Tasks completed:** [N] of [N]
**Files modified:** [Count]
**Tests:** [Pass/Fail]
**Build:** [Pass/Fail]

**Summary of changes:**
- [High-level description of what was implemented]

**Next steps:**
- [ ] Manual testing per spec's Validation Plan
- [ ] Code review
- [ ] Commit and PR

Critical Stop Points

STOP and ask the user when:

•
Blockers encountered
- •Missing dependency or file
- •Failed test that can't be fixed after several attempts
- •Unclear instruction in spec
•
Spec gaps
- •Implementation step references non-existent file
- •Missing information needed to proceed
- •Conflicting instructions
•
Scope questions
- •Discovering additional work not in spec
- •Edge cases not covered by spec

Stop Format

code

**Execution Paused: [Reason]**

**Context:** [What I was trying to do]
**Issue:** [What went wrong or is unclear]
**Question:** [Specific question for user]

Options:
A) [Suggested resolution 1]
B) [Suggested resolution 2]
C) Skip this task and continue
D) Stop execution entirely

How should I proceed?

Progress Tracking

Managing TODOs

Mirror spec's Implementation Steps in todo list:

code

Todos:
- [x] Step 1: [Task from spec]
- [x] Step 2: [Task from spec]
- [ ] Step 3: [Task from spec] (in_progress)
- [ ] Step 4: [Task from spec] (pending)

Spec File Updates

Update checkboxes in spec's Validation & Testing Plan as tests are written/pass.

Workflow Summary

code

spec-file
     │
     ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 1: ENVIRONMENT SETUP      │
│ • Check/create worktree         │
│ • Verify environment ready      │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
     │
     ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 2: LOAD & REVIEW          │
│ • Parse spec                    │
│ • Flag concerns                 │
│ • Confirm ready to proceed      │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
     │
     ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 3: EXECUTE BATCH          │
│ • Follow spec exactly           │
│ • Use sub-agents if parallel    │
│ • Track tasks                   │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
     │
     ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 4: CHECKPOINT             │
│ • Report progress               │
│ • Show verification results     │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
     │
     ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 5: CONTINUE               │
│ • Next batch → Phase 3          │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
     │
     ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────┐
│ PHASE 6: FINALIZE               │
│ • Full validation               │
│ • Update spec status            │
│ • Summary & next steps          │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
     │
     ▼
   Feature Implemented

Upon Implementation Completion

•Ask the user if they would like to commit the changes now.
•If yes, create a commit with a summary of changes made.
•If committed, ask if they would like to open a PR for review.
•If yes, create a PR with appropriate title and description.