Council Consensus Skill
Multi-perspective analysis with both Codex and Gemini, each exploring for/against/neutral viewpoints for comprehensive evaluation.
When to Use
- •Evaluating technology choices
- •Architecture decisions
- •Trade-off analysis
- •When user needs pros and cons
- •Comparing different approaches
- •Decision-making support
Reasoning Level
high (default for balanced analysis)
Execution
- •
Identify the topic/question for consensus
- •
Gather relevant context
- •
For each model, request stance-based analysis:
codeAnalyze this topic from multiple perspectives: Topic: <topic or decision> Please provide: 1. **FOR** arguments - Best case for this approach 2. **AGAINST** arguments - Concerns and risks 3. **NEUTRAL** assessment - Objective analysis 4. **Recommendation** - Your balanced conclusion
- •
Run BOTH commands in parallel:
Codex:
bashcodex exec --sandbox read-only -c model_reasoning_effort="high" "<prompt>"
Gemini:
bashgemini -s -y -o json "<prompt>"
- •
Synthesize multi-model, multi-perspective analysis
Response Format
markdown
## AI Council Consensus Analysis ### Codex (GPT-5.2) Perspectives: **FOR:** - [Pro arguments] **AGAINST:** - [Con arguments] **NEUTRAL:** - [Objective observations] **Recommendation:** [Codex's conclusion] --- ### Gemini Perspectives: **FOR:** - [Pro arguments] **AGAINST:** - [Con arguments] **NEUTRAL:** - [Objective observations] **Recommendation:** [Gemini's conclusion] --- ### Council Consensus: **Unanimous FOR:** [Points both models agree are advantages] **Unanimous AGAINST:** [Concerns both models share] **Divergent Views:** [Where the models disagree] **Cross-Model Insights:** - [Unique insights from combining perspectives] **Council Recommendation:** [Synthesized recommendation based on all perspectives from both models] **Confidence Level:** [High if both agree, Medium if partial agreement, Low if divergent] --- *Session IDs: Codex=[id], Gemini=[id]*