Council Code Review Skill

Comprehensive code review with both Codex (GPT-5.2) and Gemini for quality, security, and best practices.

When to Use

• •Before committing or creating PRs
• •Reviewing new code implementations
• •Checking for security vulnerabilities
• •Getting quality feedback
• •When user asks for code review from the council

Reasoning Level

high (default for code review)

Execution

1. •

   Identify the code to review:

   • •Specific files mentioned by user
   • •Staged git changes (git diff --staged)
   • •Recent modifications
2. •

   Gather the code content and context

3. •

   Formulate a review prompt:

   code

   Review this code for quality, security, and best practices:
   
   File: <filename>
   

   <code> ```

   Please analyze:

   1. •Potential bugs or logic errors
   2. •Security vulnerabilities
   3. •Performance issues
   4. •Code style and readability
   5. •Suggestions for improvement
   code

4. •

   Run BOTH commands in parallel:

   Codex:

   bash

   codex exec --sandbox read-only -c model_reasoning_effort="high" "<prompt>"
   

   Gemini:

   bash

   gemini -s -y -o json "<prompt>"
   

5. •

   Synthesize review findings

Response Format

## AI Council Code Review

### Codex (GPT-5.2) Review:
**Issues Found:**
- [Severity: High/Medium/Low] [Issue description]

**Security Concerns:**
- [Any security issues]

**Suggestions:**
- [Improvement suggestions]

---

### Gemini Review:
**Issues Found:**
- [Severity: High/Medium/Low] [Issue description]

**Security Concerns:**
- [Any security issues]

**Suggestions:**
- [Improvement suggestions]

---

### Council Synthesis:
**Critical Issues (Both Agree):**
- [Issues identified by both - highest priority]

**Additional Concerns:**
- [Issues only one model caught]

**Agreed Best Practices:**
- [Suggestions both models recommend]

**Final Verdict:** [LGTM / Needs Changes / Blocking Issues]

---
*Session IDs: Codex=[id], Gemini=[id]*